Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality after Emergency Laparotomy Using Glasgow Coma Scale, ASA Physical Status Classification, and P-POSSUM Score.

Muhammad Asif, Saeed Bin Ayaz, Faran Hamid, Muhammad Nabeel Imran, Adnan Mehraj, Naheed Akhtar
{"title":"Prediction of In-Hospital Mortality after Emergency Laparotomy Using Glasgow Coma Scale, ASA Physical Status Classification, and P-POSSUM Score.","authors":"Muhammad Asif, Saeed Bin Ayaz, Faran Hamid, Muhammad Nabeel Imran, Adnan Mehraj, Naheed Akhtar","doi":"10.29271/jcpsp.2025.01.95","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the importance of the Glasgow Coma scale (GCS), ASA physical status classification system, and P-POSSUM score in predicting mortality among patients undergoing emergency laparotomies.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>An analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Hospital Muzaffarabad, Pakistan, from October 2020 to January 2022.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>All emergency laparotomies performed during the above-mentioned period were included consecutively, excluding trauma laparotomies, re-do laparotomies after elective surgery, appendectomies, cholecystectomies, pancreatectomies, organ transplantation surgeries, and laparotomies due to gynaecological or vascular causes such as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The GCS scores were broken down into mild (14-15), moderate (9-13), and severe (3-8) categories. The ASA scoring was classified into five classes, i.e., Classes I to V. The P-POSSUM scores were assessed for each of the following five groups: (≤10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, and ≥41).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 50 patients (mean age: 47 ± 19 years), there were 39 (78%) males and 11 (22%) females. The median values for GCS and P-POSSUM scores were 15 and 11.1, respectively. According to the ASA, most patients (21, 42%) fit into Class II. Twelve (24%) patients died, while 38 (76%) survived. The mortality rate increased with an increasing P-POSSUM score, a lowering GCS score, and a higher class of ASA (all p <0.001). The ROC curve analysis showed that P-POSSUM had the best performance at 0.987, followed by ASA (0.951) and GCS (0.411).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ASA Physical Status Classification System and P-POSSUM scoring were significantly predictive of mortality after an emergency laparotomy.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>ASA Physical Status Classification System, Emergency laparotomy, Glasgow coma scale, Mortality, Outcome, P-POSSUM.</p>","PeriodicalId":94116,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","volume":"35 1","pages":"95-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of Physicians and Surgeons--Pakistan : JCPSP","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2025.01.95","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the importance of the Glasgow Coma scale (GCS), ASA physical status classification system, and P-POSSUM score in predicting mortality among patients undergoing emergency laparotomies.

Study design: An analytical study. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of General Surgery, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan Hospital Muzaffarabad, Pakistan, from October 2020 to January 2022.

Methodology: All emergency laparotomies performed during the above-mentioned period were included consecutively, excluding trauma laparotomies, re-do laparotomies after elective surgery, appendectomies, cholecystectomies, pancreatectomies, organ transplantation surgeries, and laparotomies due to gynaecological or vascular causes such as ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm. The GCS scores were broken down into mild (14-15), moderate (9-13), and severe (3-8) categories. The ASA scoring was classified into five classes, i.e., Classes I to V. The P-POSSUM scores were assessed for each of the following five groups: (≤10, 11-20, 21-30, 31-40, and ≥41).

Results: Out of 50 patients (mean age: 47 ± 19 years), there were 39 (78%) males and 11 (22%) females. The median values for GCS and P-POSSUM scores were 15 and 11.1, respectively. According to the ASA, most patients (21, 42%) fit into Class II. Twelve (24%) patients died, while 38 (76%) survived. The mortality rate increased with an increasing P-POSSUM score, a lowering GCS score, and a higher class of ASA (all p <0.001). The ROC curve analysis showed that P-POSSUM had the best performance at 0.987, followed by ASA (0.951) and GCS (0.411).

Conclusion: The ASA Physical Status Classification System and P-POSSUM scoring were significantly predictive of mortality after an emergency laparotomy.

Key words: ASA Physical Status Classification System, Emergency laparotomy, Glasgow coma scale, Mortality, Outcome, P-POSSUM.

应用格拉斯哥昏迷评分、ASA身体状态分级和P-POSSUM评分预测急诊剖腹手术后住院死亡率
目的:探讨格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、ASA身体状态分类系统和P-POSSUM评分在预测急诊剖腹手术患者死亡率中的重要性。研究设计:分析性研究。研究地点和时间:2020年10月至2022年1月,巴基斯坦穆扎法拉巴德Sheikh Khalifa Bin Zayed Al-Nahyan医院普通外科。方法:连续纳入上述期间所有急诊剖腹手术,不包括创伤性剖腹手术、择期手术后再次剖腹手术、阑尾切除术、胆囊切除术、胰腺切除术、器官移植手术以及因妇科或血管原因(如腹主动脉瘤破裂)进行的剖腹手术。GCS评分分为轻度(14-15分)、中度(9-13分)和重度(3-8分)。ASA评分分为5级,即I至v级。P-POSSUM评分分为以下5组:(≤10、11-20、21-30、31-40和≥41)。结果:50例患者平均年龄47±19岁,男性39例(78%),女性11例(22%)。GCS和P-POSSUM评分的中位数分别为15分和11.1分。根据ASA,大多数患者(21.42%)属于II类。12例(24%)患者死亡,38例(76%)患者存活。死亡率随p - possum评分的升高、GCS评分的降低和ASA等级的升高而升高(均为p)。结论:ASA身体状态分类系统和p - possum评分可显著预测急诊剖腹手术后的死亡率。关键词:ASA身体状态分类系统,急诊剖腹手术,格拉斯哥昏迷量表,死亡率,结局,P-POSSUM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信