Preoperative intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for elective surgery: evidence based on 12 randomized trials.

Lei Yue, Jianming Zhang, Chao Li, Ziqi Wang, Longtao Qi, Yao Zhao, Shijun Wang, Meixia Shang, Chunde Li, Haolin Sun
{"title":"Preoperative intravenous versus oral iron supplementation for elective surgery: evidence based on 12 randomized trials.","authors":"Lei Yue, Jianming Zhang, Chao Li, Ziqi Wang, Longtao Qi, Yao Zhao, Shijun Wang, Meixia Shang, Chunde Li, Haolin Sun","doi":"10.1080/00325481.2025.2454218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aims to clarify hematological parameters, transfusion requirements, and adverse events of preoperative intravenous (IVIS) versus oral iron supplementation (OIS) in elective surgery patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases up to 10 December 2023. Twelve RCTs involving 930 participants met our eligibility criteria. Our analysis focused on post-treatment hemoglobin levels, changes in hemoglobin from baseline, ferritin levels, hemoglobin attainment rates, transfusion requirements, and adverse events. We employed the random-effects model for data synthesis, calculating pooled standard mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2 tool. The GRADE approach evaluated the confidence in effect estimates.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>IVIS significantly improved post-treatment hemoglobin levels (MD = 0.77 g/dL, 95% CI [0.30 to 1.23]), hemoglobin increments (MD = 0.69 g/dL, 95% CI [0.01 to 1.37]), and ferritin levels (MD = 260.03 ng/mL, 95% CI [119.65 to 400.42]) compared to OIS. IVIS also led to a higher hemoglobin attainment rate (RR = 1.88, 95% CI [1.24 to 2.86]). No significant differences were noted in transfusion rates or volumes. IVIS was associated with fewer digestive (RR = 0.10, 95% CI [0.05 to 0.22]; I2 = 0%) but more pain-related adverse events (RR = 7.79, 95% CI [1.78 to 34.07]; I2 = 0%). Hospital stay durations and mortality rates were similar between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>IVIS offers a superior improvement in hematological parameters for elective surgery patients but not reducing transfusion needs compared to OIS. While IVIS has fewer digestive adverse events, it increases pain-related complications. These findings highlight the importance of personalized approaches in selecting iron supplementation methods, carefully balancing time, efficacy, and adverse event profiles.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD42023483284.</p>","PeriodicalId":94176,"journal":{"name":"Postgraduate medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Postgraduate medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00325481.2025.2454218","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to clarify hematological parameters, transfusion requirements, and adverse events of preoperative intravenous (IVIS) versus oral iron supplementation (OIS) in elective surgery patients.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search across multiple databases up to 10 December 2023. Twelve RCTs involving 930 participants met our eligibility criteria. Our analysis focused on post-treatment hemoglobin levels, changes in hemoglobin from baseline, ferritin levels, hemoglobin attainment rates, transfusion requirements, and adverse events. We employed the random-effects model for data synthesis, calculating pooled standard mean differences (SMD) or mean differences (MD) or risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane ROB 2 tool. The GRADE approach evaluated the confidence in effect estimates.

Findings: IVIS significantly improved post-treatment hemoglobin levels (MD = 0.77 g/dL, 95% CI [0.30 to 1.23]), hemoglobin increments (MD = 0.69 g/dL, 95% CI [0.01 to 1.37]), and ferritin levels (MD = 260.03 ng/mL, 95% CI [119.65 to 400.42]) compared to OIS. IVIS also led to a higher hemoglobin attainment rate (RR = 1.88, 95% CI [1.24 to 2.86]). No significant differences were noted in transfusion rates or volumes. IVIS was associated with fewer digestive (RR = 0.10, 95% CI [0.05 to 0.22]; I2 = 0%) but more pain-related adverse events (RR = 7.79, 95% CI [1.78 to 34.07]; I2 = 0%). Hospital stay durations and mortality rates were similar between the two groups.

Interpretation: IVIS offers a superior improvement in hematological parameters for elective surgery patients but not reducing transfusion needs compared to OIS. While IVIS has fewer digestive adverse events, it increases pain-related complications. These findings highlight the importance of personalized approaches in selecting iron supplementation methods, carefully balancing time, efficacy, and adverse event profiles.

Registration: PROSPERO CRD42023483284.

择期手术术前静脉与口服补铁:基于12个随机试验的证据
目的:本研究旨在阐明择期手术患者术前静脉补铁(IVIS)与口服补铁(OIS)的血液学参数、输血要求和不良事件。方法:截至2023年12月10日,我们在多个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。12项随机对照试验涉及930名受试者符合我们的资格标准。我们的分析集中在治疗后血红蛋白水平、血红蛋白基线变化、铁蛋白水平、血红蛋白达成率、输血需求和不良事件。我们采用随机效应模型进行数据合成,以95%置信区间(CI)计算合并标准平均差(SMD)或平均差(MD)或风险比(RR)。采用Cochrane ROB 2工具和Jadad评分评估方法学质量。GRADE方法评估效果估计的置信度。结果:与OIS相比,IVIS显著改善了治疗后血红蛋白水平(MD = 0.77 g/dL, 95% CI[0.30 ~ 1.23])、血红蛋白增量(MD = 0.69 g/dL, 95% CI[0.01 ~ 1.37])和铁蛋白水平(MD = 260.03 ng/mL, 95% CI[119.65 ~ 400.42])。IVIS也导致较高的血红蛋白达成率(RR = 1.88, 95% CI[1.24 ~ 2.86])。输血率和输血量没有显著差异。IVIS与消化不良相关(RR = 0.10, 95% CI [0.05 ~ 0.22];I2 = 0%),但更多的疼痛相关不良事件(RR = 7.79, 95% CI [1.78 ~ 34.07];i2 = 0%)。两组患者的住院时间和死亡率相似。解释:与OIS相比,IVIS为择期手术患者提供了更好的血液学参数改善,但不能减少输血需求。虽然IVIS的消化不良事件较少,但它会增加与疼痛相关的并发症。这些发现强调了在选择补铁方法、仔细平衡时间、疗效和不良事件概况方面个性化方法的重要性。注册:PROSPERO CRD42023483284。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信