Effects of clear aligners treatment in growing patients: a systematic review.

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2025-01-06 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2024.1512838
Vincenzo D'Antò, Vittoria De Simone, Silvia Caruso, Paolo Bucci, Rosa Valletta, Roberto Rongo, Rosaria Bucci
{"title":"Effects of clear aligners treatment in growing patients: a systematic review.","authors":"Vincenzo D'Antò, Vittoria De Simone, Silvia Caruso, Paolo Bucci, Rosa Valletta, Roberto Rongo, Rosaria Bucci","doi":"10.3389/froh.2024.1512838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In recent years, the use of Clear aligners (CA) has been diffused among children and adolescents. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature regarding the effects of CA therapy in growing patients, including dentoalveolar and skeletal effects, periodontal changes, and quality of life measurements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search on four databases was performed until September 2023, and studies including patients <18 years, treated with CA were selected. Studies with less than 10 patients and <i>in vitro</i>/laboratory studies were excluded. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The \"Risk of Bias 2\" (RoB 2) and the \"Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions\" (ROBINS-I) tools were applied to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Due to the heterogeneity in methodologies and outcomes encountered in the included studies, a qualitative synthesis of the results was provided.</p><p><strong>Results and conclusions: </strong>The search resulted in 32 papers (3 RCTs), with sample sizes ranging between 15 and 113. The overall risk of bias in the RCT was low, while the risk of bias in the non-RCT ranged between moderate and serious for most of the included studies. Dentoskeletal and periodontal effects were the most frequently reported outcomes. The most common comparison group was multibracket fixed therapy, while only 5 studies had an untreated control group. Significant changes in the transversal maxillary arch width after treatment with CA were reported in some studies. However, while dentoalveolar effects have been reported consistently, controversial findings were found regarding the changes in skeletal bases after treatment with CA. Concerning the results on the sagittal plane, the current literature does not support the effectiveness of CA with mandibular advancement features in correcting dentoskeletal Class II, compared to traditional functional orthopedic appliances. In the short-term evaluation, periodontal variables and bacterial levels seemed to be better controlled during CA therapy, compared to the fixed multibracket therapy. With regard to quality of life measurements, there are inconsistent findings to support differences between CA therapy and fixed multibracket appliances. Nevertheless, additional high-quality studies are required to formulate more reliable conclusions.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://osf.io/wmerq.</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1512838"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744020/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1512838","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In recent years, the use of Clear aligners (CA) has been diffused among children and adolescents. This systematic review aimed to summarize the literature regarding the effects of CA therapy in growing patients, including dentoalveolar and skeletal effects, periodontal changes, and quality of life measurements.

Methods: An electronic search on four databases was performed until September 2023, and studies including patients <18 years, treated with CA were selected. Studies with less than 10 patients and in vitro/laboratory studies were excluded. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. The "Risk of Bias 2" (RoB 2) and the "Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions" (ROBINS-I) tools were applied to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Due to the heterogeneity in methodologies and outcomes encountered in the included studies, a qualitative synthesis of the results was provided.

Results and conclusions: The search resulted in 32 papers (3 RCTs), with sample sizes ranging between 15 and 113. The overall risk of bias in the RCT was low, while the risk of bias in the non-RCT ranged between moderate and serious for most of the included studies. Dentoskeletal and periodontal effects were the most frequently reported outcomes. The most common comparison group was multibracket fixed therapy, while only 5 studies had an untreated control group. Significant changes in the transversal maxillary arch width after treatment with CA were reported in some studies. However, while dentoalveolar effects have been reported consistently, controversial findings were found regarding the changes in skeletal bases after treatment with CA. Concerning the results on the sagittal plane, the current literature does not support the effectiveness of CA with mandibular advancement features in correcting dentoskeletal Class II, compared to traditional functional orthopedic appliances. In the short-term evaluation, periodontal variables and bacterial levels seemed to be better controlled during CA therapy, compared to the fixed multibracket therapy. With regard to quality of life measurements, there are inconsistent findings to support differences between CA therapy and fixed multibracket appliances. Nevertheless, additional high-quality studies are required to formulate more reliable conclusions.

Systematic review registration: https://osf.io/wmerq.

清晰对准器治疗生长患者的效果:系统回顾。
简介:近年来,使用透明牙齿矫正器(CA)已经在儿童和青少年中扩散。本系统综述旨在总结有关CA治疗在生长患者中的作用的文献,包括牙槽骨和骨骼的影响,牙周变化和生活质量测量。方法:对四个数据库进行电子检索,直到2023年9月,排除了包括患者体外/实验室研究的研究。研究选择、数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两位审稿人独立完成。应用“偏倚风险2”(RoB 2)和“非随机干预研究的偏倚风险”(ROBINS-I)工具评估纳入研究的方法学质量。由于纳入研究的方法和结果存在异质性,因此对结果进行了定性综合。结果与结论:检索得到32篇论文(3项随机对照试验),样本量在15 ~ 113之间。RCT的总体偏倚风险较低,而大多数纳入研究的非RCT偏倚风险介于中度和严重之间。牙齿骨骼和牙周的影响是最常见的结果。最常见的对照组是多支架固定治疗,而只有5项研究有未经治疗的对照组。在一些研究中报道了CA治疗后上颌横弓宽度的显著变化。然而,尽管对牙槽骨的影响一直有报道,但对于CA治疗后骨基的变化,发现了有争议的发现。关于矢状面结果,目前的文献并不支持与传统功能矫形器相比,具有下颌前移特征的CA在矫正牙骨骼II类方面的有效性。在短期评估中,与固定多支架治疗相比,CA治疗似乎可以更好地控制牙周变量和细菌水平。关于生活质量测量,有不一致的发现支持CA治疗和固定多支架矫治器之间的差异。然而,需要更多的高质量研究来得出更可靠的结论。系统评审注册:https://osf.io/wmerq。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信