Effect of dry needling, ischemic compression and cross-taping of the masseter in patients with orofacial myofascial pain: a randomized comparative study.

IF 3 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Frontiers in oral health Pub Date : 2025-01-07 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/froh.2024.1524496
B Macedo de Sousa, N López-Valverde, A López-Valverde, D Neves, M Santos, J A Blanco Rueda
{"title":"Effect of dry needling, ischemic compression and cross-taping of the masseter in patients with orofacial myofascial pain: a randomized comparative study.","authors":"B Macedo de Sousa, N López-Valverde, A López-Valverde, D Neves, M Santos, J A Blanco Rueda","doi":"10.3389/froh.2024.1524496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Temporomandibular disorders, of multifactorial etiology, refer to a series of pathologies that affect the temporomandibular joint and the associated musculature of the orofacial region and are the result of alterations in the physiological relationships of the stomatognathic system, responsible for functions such as chewing, phonation and swallowing. They produce, among other symptoms, mainly pain, which affects the quality of life of the patients who suffer from them. To alleviate the discomfort of neuromuscular pathology in the orofacial region, various therapeutic strategies are employed, ranging from non-invasive to more invasive methods. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of three therapeutic methods (dry needling, ischemic compression and cross-taping) in reducing or relieving masseter pain in individuals with orofacial myofascial pain.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A multicenter randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted in 60 subjects over 18 years of age, divided into three groups: dry needling, ischemic compression and cross-taping. Pain intensity was assessed, randomly, by a single blinded evaluator, according to the Numerical Pain Rating Scale in the pre-treatment period, immediately after, 1-2 weeks and one month later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Immediately after applying the therapies, there was a greater decrease in pain intensity in dry needling, followed by ischemic compression and a smaller decrease in the cross-taping technique (<i>p</i> < 0.0001; <i>p</i> = 0.0001; <i>p</i> = 0.0014, respectively). After 1-2 weeks, there was a noticeable increase in the dry needling technique, however, there was a decrease in pain in the cross-taping technique. After 1 month of application, both dry needling and ischemic compression showed a slight reduction in pain intensity, in contrast to the cross-taping group, which showed an increase in pain intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Dry needling and ischemic compression were more effective than cross-taping for immediate reduction of orofacial myofascial pain. Further short- and long-term research is needed to confirm these findings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT0660604).</p>","PeriodicalId":94016,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in oral health","volume":"5 ","pages":"1524496"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11747114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in oral health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/froh.2024.1524496","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Temporomandibular disorders, of multifactorial etiology, refer to a series of pathologies that affect the temporomandibular joint and the associated musculature of the orofacial region and are the result of alterations in the physiological relationships of the stomatognathic system, responsible for functions such as chewing, phonation and swallowing. They produce, among other symptoms, mainly pain, which affects the quality of life of the patients who suffer from them. To alleviate the discomfort of neuromuscular pathology in the orofacial region, various therapeutic strategies are employed, ranging from non-invasive to more invasive methods. The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of three therapeutic methods (dry needling, ischemic compression and cross-taping) in reducing or relieving masseter pain in individuals with orofacial myofascial pain.

Materials and methods: A multicenter randomized comparative clinical trial was conducted in 60 subjects over 18 years of age, divided into three groups: dry needling, ischemic compression and cross-taping. Pain intensity was assessed, randomly, by a single blinded evaluator, according to the Numerical Pain Rating Scale in the pre-treatment period, immediately after, 1-2 weeks and one month later.

Results: Immediately after applying the therapies, there was a greater decrease in pain intensity in dry needling, followed by ischemic compression and a smaller decrease in the cross-taping technique (p < 0.0001; p = 0.0001; p = 0.0014, respectively). After 1-2 weeks, there was a noticeable increase in the dry needling technique, however, there was a decrease in pain in the cross-taping technique. After 1 month of application, both dry needling and ischemic compression showed a slight reduction in pain intensity, in contrast to the cross-taping group, which showed an increase in pain intensity.

Conclusions: Dry needling and ischemic compression were more effective than cross-taping for immediate reduction of orofacial myofascial pain. Further short- and long-term research is needed to confirm these findings.

Clinical trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov, identifier (NCT0660604).

干针刺、缺血压迫和交叉贴敷咬肌治疗口面肌筋膜疼痛的疗效:一项随机对照研究。
背景与目的:颞下颌关节疾病是指影响颞下颌关节及其相关的口面部肌肉组织的一系列疾病,是负责咀嚼、发声和吞咽等功能的口颌系统生理关系改变的结果。除其他症状外,它们产生的主要症状是疼痛,这影响了患者的生活质量。为了减轻口面部神经肌肉病理的不适,采用了各种治疗策略,从非侵入性到侵入性方法。本研究的目的是比较三种治疗方法(干针、缺血压迫和交叉贴布)在减轻或缓解口面肌筋膜疼痛患者咬肌疼痛方面的疗效。材料与方法:采用多中心随机对照临床试验方法,将60名年龄在18岁以上的受试者分为干针组、缺血压迫组和交叉贴敷组。在治疗前、治疗后、1-2周和1个月后,采用单盲评估法随机评估疼痛强度。结果:应用该疗法后,干针刺的疼痛强度下降幅度较大,其次是缺血压迫,交叉贴带技术的疼痛强度下降幅度较小(p p = 0.0001;P = 0.0014)。1-2周后,干针技术的疼痛明显增加,然而,交叉贴带技术的疼痛减轻。应用1个月后,与交叉贴敷组相比,干针和缺血压迫组的疼痛强度均略有降低,而交叉贴敷组的疼痛强度则有所增加。结论:干针和缺血压迫比交叉贴带更能有效地立即减轻口面部肌筋膜疼痛。需要进一步的短期和长期研究来证实这些发现。临床试验注册:clinicaltrials.gov,标识符(NCT0660604)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信