{"title":"Assessment of shock index in healthy cats and in cats presenting to an emergency room with shock","authors":"Leandro Fadel DVM, MSc, Rodrigo Cardoso Rabelo DVM, MSc, PhD, Denise Tabacchi Fantoni DVM, MSc, PhD, Gustavo Machado DMV, MSc, PhD, Marina Candido Duarte DVM, Gabriela da Cruz Schaefer DVM, MScv, Mariana Pires Oliveira DVM, MSc, Jessica de Oliveira Lara Castanheira Fadel DVM, MSc, Kamila dos Santos Morais DVM, Glaucia Bueno Pereira-Neto DVM, MSc, PhD, Fernanda Vieira Amorim da Costa DVM, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/vec.13446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To prospectively compare the shock index (SI) in a population of healthy cats with a population of cats presenting to the emergency room (ER) deemed to be in a state of shock.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective cohort study of cats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University teaching hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-seven healthy control cats were enrolled to establish a reference interval, and 27 cats were enrolled that were presented to the ER with clinical signs of shock. Shock was defined as abnormalities in at least 2 of the following inclusion criteria: plasma lactate concentration > 2.5 mmol/L; peripheral vasoconstriction (at least 2 of the following parameters: capillary refill time >3 s, rectal-interdigital temperature gradient [RITG] >8°C, femoral pulse not palpable, pale mucous membranes); or systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mm Hg.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>Upon presentation, SI (SI = heart rate [HR]/SBP), HR, SBP, and RITG were recorded in both groups, along with peripheral venous blood sampling for lactate measurement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean SI in the control group was 1.47 ± 0.2 and was 1.87 ± 0.47 in the shock group (<i>P </i>= 0.001). Using equality in sensitivity and specificity of 0.7, an SI cutoff point of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.86) was determined with an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.90). HR, plasma lactate concentration, and RITG did not differ between the groups. Systolic arterial blood pressure (<i>P</i> = 0.01), rectal temperature (<i>P</i> = 0.02), and interdigital temperature (<i>P</i> = 0.04) differed significantly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The SI is a noninvasive, easy, and reliable parameter for distinguishing cats in shock from normal cats.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"35 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To prospectively compare the shock index (SI) in a population of healthy cats with a population of cats presenting to the emergency room (ER) deemed to be in a state of shock.
Design
Prospective cohort study of cats.
Setting
University teaching hospital.
Animals
Twenty-seven healthy control cats were enrolled to establish a reference interval, and 27 cats were enrolled that were presented to the ER with clinical signs of shock. Shock was defined as abnormalities in at least 2 of the following inclusion criteria: plasma lactate concentration > 2.5 mmol/L; peripheral vasoconstriction (at least 2 of the following parameters: capillary refill time >3 s, rectal-interdigital temperature gradient [RITG] >8°C, femoral pulse not palpable, pale mucous membranes); or systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mm Hg.
Interventions
Upon presentation, SI (SI = heart rate [HR]/SBP), HR, SBP, and RITG were recorded in both groups, along with peripheral venous blood sampling for lactate measurement.
Measurements and Main Results
The mean SI in the control group was 1.47 ± 0.2 and was 1.87 ± 0.47 in the shock group (P = 0.001). Using equality in sensitivity and specificity of 0.7, an SI cutoff point of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.86) was determined with an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.90). HR, plasma lactate concentration, and RITG did not differ between the groups. Systolic arterial blood pressure (P = 0.01), rectal temperature (P = 0.02), and interdigital temperature (P = 0.04) differed significantly.
Conclusions
The SI is a noninvasive, easy, and reliable parameter for distinguishing cats in shock from normal cats.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues.
The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.