Assessment of shock index in healthy cats and in cats presenting to an emergency room with shock

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Leandro Fadel DVM, MSc, Rodrigo Cardoso Rabelo DVM, MSc, PhD, Denise Tabacchi Fantoni DVM, MSc, PhD, Gustavo Machado DMV, MSc, PhD, Marina Candido Duarte DVM, Gabriela da Cruz Schaefer DVM, MScv, Mariana Pires Oliveira DVM, MSc, Jessica de Oliveira Lara Castanheira Fadel DVM, MSc, Kamila dos Santos Morais DVM, Glaucia Bueno Pereira-Neto DVM, MSc, PhD, Fernanda Vieira Amorim da Costa DVM, MSc, PhD
{"title":"Assessment of shock index in healthy cats and in cats presenting to an emergency room with shock","authors":"Leandro Fadel DVM, MSc,&nbsp;Rodrigo Cardoso Rabelo DVM, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Denise Tabacchi Fantoni DVM, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Gustavo Machado DMV, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Marina Candido Duarte DVM,&nbsp;Gabriela da Cruz Schaefer DVM, MScv,&nbsp;Mariana Pires Oliveira DVM, MSc,&nbsp;Jessica de Oliveira Lara Castanheira Fadel DVM, MSc,&nbsp;Kamila dos Santos Morais DVM,&nbsp;Glaucia Bueno Pereira-Neto DVM, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Fernanda Vieira Amorim da Costa DVM, MSc, PhD","doi":"10.1111/vec.13446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To prospectively compare the shock index (SI) in a population of healthy cats with a population of cats presenting to the emergency room (ER) deemed to be in a state of shock.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Prospective cohort study of cats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>University teaching hospital.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-seven healthy control cats were enrolled to establish a reference interval, and 27 cats were enrolled that were presented to the ER with clinical signs of shock. Shock was defined as abnormalities in at least 2 of the following inclusion criteria: plasma lactate concentration &gt; 2.5 mmol/L; peripheral vasoconstriction (at least 2 of the following parameters: capillary refill time &gt;3 s, rectal-interdigital temperature gradient [RITG] &gt;8°C, femoral pulse not palpable, pale mucous membranes); or systolic blood pressure (SBP) &lt; 100 mm Hg.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>Upon presentation, SI (SI = heart rate [HR]/SBP), HR, SBP, and RITG were recorded in both groups, along with peripheral venous blood sampling for lactate measurement.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>The mean SI in the control group was 1.47 ± 0.2 and was 1.87 ± 0.47 in the shock group (<i>P </i>= 0.001). Using equality in sensitivity and specificity of 0.7, an SI cutoff point of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.86) was determined with an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.90). HR, plasma lactate concentration, and RITG did not differ between the groups. Systolic arterial blood pressure (<i>P</i> = 0.01), rectal temperature (<i>P</i> = 0.02), and interdigital temperature (<i>P</i> = 0.04) differed significantly.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The SI is a noninvasive, easy, and reliable parameter for distinguishing cats in shock from normal cats.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"35 1","pages":"34-40"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13446","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To prospectively compare the shock index (SI) in a population of healthy cats with a population of cats presenting to the emergency room (ER) deemed to be in a state of shock.

Design

Prospective cohort study of cats.

Setting

University teaching hospital.

Animals

Twenty-seven healthy control cats were enrolled to establish a reference interval, and 27 cats were enrolled that were presented to the ER with clinical signs of shock. Shock was defined as abnormalities in at least 2 of the following inclusion criteria: plasma lactate concentration > 2.5 mmol/L; peripheral vasoconstriction (at least 2 of the following parameters: capillary refill time >3 s, rectal-interdigital temperature gradient [RITG] >8°C, femoral pulse not palpable, pale mucous membranes); or systolic blood pressure (SBP) < 100 mm Hg.

Interventions

Upon presentation, SI (SI = heart rate [HR]/SBP), HR, SBP, and RITG were recorded in both groups, along with peripheral venous blood sampling for lactate measurement.

Measurements and Main Results

The mean SI in the control group was 1.47 ± 0.2 and was 1.87 ± 0.47 in the shock group (= 0.001). Using equality in sensitivity and specificity of 0.7, an SI cutoff point of 1.54 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.86) was determined with an estimated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.65–0.90). HR, plasma lactate concentration, and RITG did not differ between the groups. Systolic arterial blood pressure (P = 0.01), rectal temperature (P = 0.02), and interdigital temperature (P = 0.04) differed significantly.

Conclusions

The SI is a noninvasive, easy, and reliable parameter for distinguishing cats in shock from normal cats.

评估健康猫和因休克而到急诊室的猫的休克指数。
目的:前瞻性地比较一群健康猫与一群被认为处于休克状态的猫的休克指数(SI)。设计:猫的前瞻性队列研究。单位:大学教学医院。动物:27只健康的对照猫被纳入研究以建立参考区间,另外27只猫被纳入有临床休克症状的猫被送到急诊室。休克定义为至少符合以下2项纳入标准的异常:血浆乳酸浓度> 2.5 mmol/L;外周血管收缩(以下参数中至少2项:毛细血管再充盈时间bbbb3 s,直肠-指间温度梯度[RITG] b> 8℃,股动脉脉搏未触及,粘膜苍白);干预措施:就诊后,记录两组患者的SI(心率[HR]/收缩压)、HR、SBP和RITG,同时采集外周静脉血测量乳酸含量。测量结果及主要结果:对照组平均SI为1.47±0.2,休克组平均SI为1.87±0.47 (P = 0.001)。灵敏度和特异性均为0.7,SI截止点为1.54(95%置信区间[CI]: 0.49-0.86),受试者工作特征曲线下估计面积为0.78 (95% CI: 0.65-0.90)。HR、血浆乳酸浓度、RITG组间无差异。收缩压(P = 0.01)、直肠温度(P = 0.02)、指间温度(P = 0.04)差异有统计学意义。结论:SI是一种无创、简便、可靠的区分猫与正常猫休克的参数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信