Neurophysiological Markers of Regulation Success in Everyday Life in Depression.

Jonathan P Stange, Ellie P Xu, Sarah L Zapetis, Jiani Li, Lisanne Jenkins, Jagan Jimmy, Zihua Ye, Pia Sellery, Coralie S Phanord, Erika Forbes, Timothy J Trull, Robin J Mermelstein, Olusola Ajilore
{"title":"Neurophysiological Markers of Regulation Success in Everyday Life in Depression.","authors":"Jonathan P Stange, Ellie P Xu, Sarah L Zapetis, Jiani Li, Lisanne Jenkins, Jagan Jimmy, Zihua Ye, Pia Sellery, Coralie S Phanord, Erika Forbes, Timothy J Trull, Robin J Mermelstein, Olusola Ajilore","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Self-regulation often is disrupted in depression and is characterized by negative affect and inflexible parasympathetic responses. Yet, our understanding of brain mechanisms of self-regulatory processes largely has been limited to laboratory contexts. Measuring individual differences in self-regulatory processes in everyday life - and their neural correlates - could inform our understanding of depression phenotypes and reveal novel intervention targets that impact everyday functioning.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In individuals with remitted major depressive disorder (rMDD) and healthy comparison participants (N=74), we measured two dimensions of regulation success in everyday life - perceived success with regulating affect, and physiological success (parasympathetic augmentation following regulation attempts) - and their neural correlates using an fMRI emotion regulation task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Perceptions of success were weakly associated with physiological success and had partially distinct neural correlates. Perceived success and physiological success in everyday life predicted reduced activity in brain regions involved in emotional salience while reacting to aversive stimuli in the scanner. During reappraisal in the scanner, greater perceived success in everyday life was dimensionally associated with more reappraisal-related activity in regions involved in cognitive control (including dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex); in contrast, physiological success predicted enhanced downregulation of salience network activity (amygdala, insula).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results suggest linking psychophysiology with behavior in everyday life can provide a window into dissociable dimensions of self-regulatory functioning. Integrating ambulatory and brain-based metrics may elucidate self-regulatory phenotypes with distinct neurophysiological mechanisms and targets for intervention to impact functioning in daily life.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.01.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Self-regulation often is disrupted in depression and is characterized by negative affect and inflexible parasympathetic responses. Yet, our understanding of brain mechanisms of self-regulatory processes largely has been limited to laboratory contexts. Measuring individual differences in self-regulatory processes in everyday life - and their neural correlates - could inform our understanding of depression phenotypes and reveal novel intervention targets that impact everyday functioning.

Methods: In individuals with remitted major depressive disorder (rMDD) and healthy comparison participants (N=74), we measured two dimensions of regulation success in everyday life - perceived success with regulating affect, and physiological success (parasympathetic augmentation following regulation attempts) - and their neural correlates using an fMRI emotion regulation task.

Results: Perceptions of success were weakly associated with physiological success and had partially distinct neural correlates. Perceived success and physiological success in everyday life predicted reduced activity in brain regions involved in emotional salience while reacting to aversive stimuli in the scanner. During reappraisal in the scanner, greater perceived success in everyday life was dimensionally associated with more reappraisal-related activity in regions involved in cognitive control (including dorsolateral and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex); in contrast, physiological success predicted enhanced downregulation of salience network activity (amygdala, insula).

Conclusions: Results suggest linking psychophysiology with behavior in everyday life can provide a window into dissociable dimensions of self-regulatory functioning. Integrating ambulatory and brain-based metrics may elucidate self-regulatory phenotypes with distinct neurophysiological mechanisms and targets for intervention to impact functioning in daily life.

抑郁症患者日常生活调节成功的神经生理标志。
背景:自我调节在抑郁症中经常被破坏,其特征是负面情绪和不灵活的副交感神经反应。然而,我们对自我调节过程的大脑机制的理解很大程度上局限于实验室环境。测量日常生活中自我调节过程的个体差异及其神经相关性,可以帮助我们了解抑郁症的表型,并揭示影响日常功能的新干预目标。方法:在重度抑郁症(rMDD)缓解的个体和健康的对照参与者(N=74)中,我们使用fMRI情绪调节任务测量了日常生活中调节成功的两个维度-调节情感的感知成功和生理成功(调节尝试后的副交感神经增强)-以及它们的神经相关性。结果:成功的感知与生理上的成功有微弱的联系,并有部分明显的神经相关。在日常生活中,感知到的成功和生理上的成功预示着在扫描仪上对厌恶刺激做出反应时,大脑中涉及情绪突出的区域的活动减少。在扫描仪中进行重新评估时,在认知控制区域(包括背外侧和背内侧前额皮质)中,日常生活中更大的感知成功与更多的重新评估相关活动在维度上相关;相反,生理上的成功预示着显著性网络活动(杏仁核、脑岛)的下调。结论:结果表明,将心理生理学与日常生活中的行为联系起来可以为自我调节功能的可分离维度提供一个窗口。整合动态和基于大脑的指标可以阐明具有不同神经生理机制的自我调节表型和干预目标,以影响日常生活功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信