Exploratory Analysis of Unstable Surface Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Chronic Ankle Instability

IF 1.9 Q2 REHABILITATION
Shuang Liu MS , Bo Gou PhD , Zhiguang Zhao PhD , Qirong Wang PhD
{"title":"Exploratory Analysis of Unstable Surface Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Chronic Ankle Instability","authors":"Shuang Liu MS ,&nbsp;Bo Gou PhD ,&nbsp;Zhiguang Zhao PhD ,&nbsp;Qirong Wang PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.arrct.2024.100365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To conduct an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of unstable surface training on balance and hop function in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).</div></div><div><h3>Data Sources</h3><div>Four major electronic databases were searched, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, from January 1, 2000 to June 20, 2024.</div></div><div><h3>Study Selection</h3><div>Randomized controlled trials that compare unstable surface training with either general intervention or no intervention in individuals with CAI were included.</div></div><div><h3>Data Extraction</h3><div>The physical therapy evidence database scale was used to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality of included studies. The mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Review Manager 5.4 software.</div></div><div><h3>Data Synthesis</h3><div>The review ultimately included 9 studies involving 308 participants. Compared with the other exercises or no exercise, unstable surface training could improve the significant effects of the star excursion balance test (SEBT) in the direction of posterolateral (MD=5.80; 95% CI, 1.60-9.99; P=.007), posteromedial (MD=6.24; 95% CI, 2.32-10.16; P=.002), medial (MD=9.11; 95% CI, 6.42-11.80; P&lt;.00001), anteromedial (MD=7.25; 95% CI, 2.33-12.17; P=.004), the time-in-balance test (MD=8.45; 95% CI, 1.50-15.40; P=.02), the foot-lift test (MD=-1.39; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.28; P=.01). However, there was no significant difference in the anterior direction of the SEBT (MD=3.22; 95% CI, -0.66 to 7.10; P=.10), the side-hop test (MD=-1.94; 95% CI, -4.82 to 0.95; P=.19), and the figure-of-8 hop test (MD=-0.97; 95% CI, -2.39 to 0.46; P=.18) between groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Compared with the other exercises or no exercise, unstable surface training has potential benefits in improving balance in people with CAI but has no significant effect on hop function. However, the exploratory nature of this study highlights the need for further research to confirm these findings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72291,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","volume":"6 4","pages":"Article 100365"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11734016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590109524000636","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To conduct an exploratory systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of unstable surface training on balance and hop function in individuals with chronic ankle instability (CAI).

Data Sources

Four major electronic databases were searched, including Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science, from January 1, 2000 to June 20, 2024.

Study Selection

Randomized controlled trials that compare unstable surface training with either general intervention or no intervention in individuals with CAI were included.

Data Extraction

The physical therapy evidence database scale was used to assess the risk of bias and methodological quality of included studies. The mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Review Manager 5.4 software.

Data Synthesis

The review ultimately included 9 studies involving 308 participants. Compared with the other exercises or no exercise, unstable surface training could improve the significant effects of the star excursion balance test (SEBT) in the direction of posterolateral (MD=5.80; 95% CI, 1.60-9.99; P=.007), posteromedial (MD=6.24; 95% CI, 2.32-10.16; P=.002), medial (MD=9.11; 95% CI, 6.42-11.80; P<.00001), anteromedial (MD=7.25; 95% CI, 2.33-12.17; P=.004), the time-in-balance test (MD=8.45; 95% CI, 1.50-15.40; P=.02), the foot-lift test (MD=-1.39; 95% CI, -2.49 to -0.28; P=.01). However, there was no significant difference in the anterior direction of the SEBT (MD=3.22; 95% CI, -0.66 to 7.10; P=.10), the side-hop test (MD=-1.94; 95% CI, -4.82 to 0.95; P=.19), and the figure-of-8 hop test (MD=-0.97; 95% CI, -2.39 to 0.46; P=.18) between groups.

Conclusions

Compared with the other exercises or no exercise, unstable surface training has potential benefits in improving balance in people with CAI but has no significant effect on hop function. However, the exploratory nature of this study highlights the need for further research to confirm these findings.
不稳定地面训练的探索性分析:慢性踝关节不稳定的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:通过探索性系统综述和荟萃分析,评价不稳定表面训练对慢性踝关节不稳定(CAI)患者平衡和跳跃功能的影响。数据来源:检索了四个主要的电子数据库,包括Cochrane Library、PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,检索时间为2000年1月1日至2024年6月20日。研究选择:随机对照试验比较不稳定表面训练与一般干预或不干预的个体CAI纳入。数据提取:采用物理治疗证据数据库量表评估纳入研究的偏倚风险和方法学质量。使用Review Manager 5.4软件计算95%置信区间(ci)的平均差值(MDs)。数据综合:该综述最终纳入了9项研究,涉及308名参与者。与其他运动或不运动相比,不稳定表面训练能显著提高后外侧星移平衡测试(SEBT)的效果(MD=5.80;95% ci, 1.60-9.99;P=.007),后内侧(MD=6.24;95% ci, 2.32-10.16;P=.002),内侧(MD=9.11;95% ci, 6.42-11.80;结论:与其他运动或不运动相比,不稳定地面训练对改善CAI患者的平衡有潜在的好处,但对hop功能没有显著影响。然而,本研究的探索性强调了进一步研究以证实这些发现的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信