Observation on the therapeutic effect of rolling the target muscle groups of lower limbs with foam rollers of different shore hardness on DOMS.

IF 1.4 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY
American journal of clinical and experimental immunology Pub Date : 2024-12-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62347/BUIX3741
Yutong Lu, Wenhui Xue, Renxin Ji
{"title":"Observation on the therapeutic effect of rolling the target muscle groups of lower limbs with foam rollers of different shore hardness on DOMS.","authors":"Yutong Lu, Wenhui Xue, Renxin Ji","doi":"10.62347/BUIX3741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This experiment aims to explore how foam rollers of different Shore hardness affect DOMS, providing insights for sports therapy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty participants from Shanghai Sanda University who have no habit of strength training, no lower limb injury, and meet the health standards were selected to conduct three experiments under the conditions of no intervention, using a 50 Shore hardness foam roller, and using a 60 Shore hardness foam roller, respectively. Data were recorded before and after modeling, as well as 24, 48, and 72 hours later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in various indicators among the three groups of subjects before and immediately after DOMS modeling (<i>P</i>>0.05). Following intervention, the 60 Shore hardness foam roller significantly reduced DOMS pain (NRS score) compared to the 50 Shore hardness roller, improved knee flexion range of motion, and increased standing long jump distance (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 60 Shore hardness foam roller is superior to the 50 Shore hardness foam roller in alleviating DOMS, improving joint range of motion, and enhancing athletic performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":72163,"journal":{"name":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","volume":"13 6","pages":"272-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744345/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of clinical and experimental immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/BUIX3741","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This experiment aims to explore how foam rollers of different Shore hardness affect DOMS, providing insights for sports therapy.

Methods: Forty participants from Shanghai Sanda University who have no habit of strength training, no lower limb injury, and meet the health standards were selected to conduct three experiments under the conditions of no intervention, using a 50 Shore hardness foam roller, and using a 60 Shore hardness foam roller, respectively. Data were recorded before and after modeling, as well as 24, 48, and 72 hours later.

Results: There were no significant differences in various indicators among the three groups of subjects before and immediately after DOMS modeling (P>0.05). Following intervention, the 60 Shore hardness foam roller significantly reduced DOMS pain (NRS score) compared to the 50 Shore hardness roller, improved knee flexion range of motion, and increased standing long jump distance (P<0.05).

Conclusions: The 60 Shore hardness foam roller is superior to the 50 Shore hardness foam roller in alleviating DOMS, improving joint range of motion, and enhancing athletic performance.

不同邵氏硬度泡沫滚子滚动下肢目标肌群治疗迟发性肌肉酸痛的疗效观察。
目的:本实验旨在探讨不同邵氏硬度泡沫滚子对迟发性迟发性肌肉酸痛的影响,为运动治疗提供参考。方法:选取上海散达大学40名无力量训练习惯、无下肢损伤、符合健康标准的受试者,分别在不干预、50邵氏硬度泡沫滚轮和60邵氏硬度泡沫滚轮的条件下进行3项实验。分别在建模前后以及24、48、72小时后记录数据。结果:三组受试者在迟发性肌肉酸痛建模前后各项指标比较,差异均无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。干预后,与50邵氏硬度滚轮相比,60邵氏硬度滚轮显著减轻了DOMS疼痛(NRS评分),改善了膝关节屈曲活动范围,增加了立定跳远距离(结论:60邵氏硬度滚轮在缓解DOMS、改善关节活动范围和提高运动成绩方面优于50邵氏硬度滚轮。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信