{"title":"Health Literacy, Label Comprehension, and Consumer Perceptions of Quasi-Drug Information Among Korean Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Youngill Ko, Heui Jae Kim, Seung-Mi Lee","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S502368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Health literacy (HL) is crucial in understanding labels of healthcare products. This study aimed to evaluate HL and its impact on comprehending quasi-drug labels, assess consumer perceptions of key label elements and their perceived importance, and provide actionable recommendations for improving label design and health communication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An online cross-sectional survey of 500 Korean adults (aged 20-69) was conducted in September 2023 using proportionate stratified sampling based on the 2020 Korean Census. HL was assessed using the Korean Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-K). The survey included demographic data, quasi-drug usage patterns, comprehension of 63 quasi-drug terms, and perceptions of label elements. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the importance, agreement, and need for improvement of label elements, and statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, <i>t</i>-tests, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most participants had inadequate HL (68.4%). Adequate HL is strongly associated with higher comprehension of quasi-drug terms (r = 0.783, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Older age (60-69 years, AOR = 5.97, 95% CI: 1.74-20.48) and adequate HL (AOR = 28.54, 95% CI: 9.68-84.15) positively influenced comprehension. Participants with adequate HL rated the importance of label elements, such as \"ingredient name\" (mean = 4.02, SD = 0.79, <i>p</i> = 0.015) and \"contraindications\" (mean = 4.68, SD = 0.57, <i>p</i> < 0.001), higher than those with inadequate HL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant disparities exist in the comprehension and perceived importance of quasi-drug label elements based on HL levels among Korean adults. Findings emphasize the need for targeted strategies, such as using simplified language and visual aids, to enhance label comprehension. These interventions could improve public health outcomes by increasing understanding of quasi-drug information across diverse HL levels. Future research should focus on developing and testing these targeted interventions to bridge the identified comprehension gap.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"173-183"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745137/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S502368","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: Health literacy (HL) is crucial in understanding labels of healthcare products. This study aimed to evaluate HL and its impact on comprehending quasi-drug labels, assess consumer perceptions of key label elements and their perceived importance, and provide actionable recommendations for improving label design and health communication.
Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of 500 Korean adults (aged 20-69) was conducted in September 2023 using proportionate stratified sampling based on the 2020 Korean Census. HL was assessed using the Korean Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine (REALM-K). The survey included demographic data, quasi-drug usage patterns, comprehension of 63 quasi-drug terms, and perceptions of label elements. A 5-point Likert scale was used to assess the importance, agreement, and need for improvement of label elements, and statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, t-tests, Pearson correlation, and logistic regression.
Results: Most participants had inadequate HL (68.4%). Adequate HL is strongly associated with higher comprehension of quasi-drug terms (r = 0.783, p < 0.001). Older age (60-69 years, AOR = 5.97, 95% CI: 1.74-20.48) and adequate HL (AOR = 28.54, 95% CI: 9.68-84.15) positively influenced comprehension. Participants with adequate HL rated the importance of label elements, such as "ingredient name" (mean = 4.02, SD = 0.79, p = 0.015) and "contraindications" (mean = 4.68, SD = 0.57, p < 0.001), higher than those with inadequate HL.
Conclusion: Significant disparities exist in the comprehension and perceived importance of quasi-drug label elements based on HL levels among Korean adults. Findings emphasize the need for targeted strategies, such as using simplified language and visual aids, to enhance label comprehension. These interventions could improve public health outcomes by increasing understanding of quasi-drug information across diverse HL levels. Future research should focus on developing and testing these targeted interventions to bridge the identified comprehension gap.
期刊介绍:
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include:
Public and community health
Policy and law
Preventative and predictive healthcare
Risk and hazard management
Epidemiology, detection and screening
Lifestyle and diet modification
Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs
Health and safety and occupational health
Healthcare services provision
Health literacy and education
Advertising and promotion of health issues
Health economic evaluations and resource management
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.