Comparative effectiveness of the exact versus estimated angle of head position in the Epley maneuver: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Sanathorn Chowsilpa, Jakarin Chawachat, Nicha Hansudewechakul, Suwicha Kaewsiri Isaradisaikul, Charuk Hanprasertpong
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of the exact versus estimated angle of head position in the Epley maneuver: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Sanathorn Chowsilpa, Jakarin Chawachat, Nicha Hansudewechakul, Suwicha Kaewsiri Isaradisaikul, Charuk Hanprasertpong","doi":"10.1159/000543528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The Epley maneuver is the recommended treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (PC-BPPV). Traditionally, the angle of the patient's head in each position during the Epley maneuver is not monitored and subjectively estimated by physicians. As a result, deviations of head angles from the standard may affect the treatment result. This study aimed to compare the outcome of the Epley maneuver between the group of exact head angles and the group of subjectively estimated angles (traditional Epley maneuver). Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Chiang Mai University Hospital. PC-BPPV patients were attached with the head angle measuring device and randomized into 2 groups: Group I - the exact angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver with accurate head angle in each step; and Group II - the estimated angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver by estimating the head angle (traditional Epley maneuver). The treatment outcomes were measured at 1 week in the aspects of negative Dix Hallpike results and severity of dizziness. Results Thirty-one PC-BPPV patients were recruited and randomized into Group I (15 participants) and Group II (16 participants). Both groups showed clinical improvement. Although significant deviations of head angles were observed in group II, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness at the 1-week follow-up. Conclusion Although significant variations of head angles were observed during the traditional Epley maneuver by experienced physicians, these deviations were slight (less than 15°) and did not significantly affect the successful treatment outcome at 1 week, in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness, when compared to the group with accurate head angle during the Epley maneuver.</p>","PeriodicalId":55432,"journal":{"name":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","volume":" ","pages":"1-18"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology and Neuro-Otology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000543528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction The Epley maneuver is the recommended treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo of the posterior semicircular canal (PC-BPPV). Traditionally, the angle of the patient's head in each position during the Epley maneuver is not monitored and subjectively estimated by physicians. As a result, deviations of head angles from the standard may affect the treatment result. This study aimed to compare the outcome of the Epley maneuver between the group of exact head angles and the group of subjectively estimated angles (traditional Epley maneuver). Methods A single-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted at the Department of Otolaryngology, Chiang Mai University Hospital. PC-BPPV patients were attached with the head angle measuring device and randomized into 2 groups: Group I - the exact angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver with accurate head angle in each step; and Group II - the estimated angle group, physicians performed the Epley maneuver by estimating the head angle (traditional Epley maneuver). The treatment outcomes were measured at 1 week in the aspects of negative Dix Hallpike results and severity of dizziness. Results Thirty-one PC-BPPV patients were recruited and randomized into Group I (15 participants) and Group II (16 participants). Both groups showed clinical improvement. Although significant deviations of head angles were observed in group II, there was no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness at the 1-week follow-up. Conclusion Although significant variations of head angles were observed during the traditional Epley maneuver by experienced physicians, these deviations were slight (less than 15°) and did not significantly affect the successful treatment outcome at 1 week, in terms of negative Dix Hallpike and severity of dizziness, when compared to the group with accurate head angle during the Epley maneuver.

Epley动作中头部位置的准确角度与估计角度的比较效果:一项随机对照试验。
Epley手法是后半规管良性阵发性位置性眩晕的推荐治疗方法。传统上,在Epley手法中,患者在每个体位的头部角度不被医生监测和主观估计。因此,头部角度与标准的偏差可能会影响治疗结果。本研究旨在比较准确的头部角度组和主观估计的角度组(传统的Epley手法)的Epley手法的效果。方法在清迈大学附属医院耳鼻喉科进行单盲随机对照试验。PC-BPPV患者安装头部角度测量装置,随机分为2组:I组-精确角度组,医生在每步中均采用准确头部角度的Epley手法;第二组为预估角度组,医生通过预估头部角度进行Epley手法(传统的Epley手法)。治疗结果在1周时测量Dix Hallpike阴性结果和头晕严重程度。结果招募31例PC-BPPV患者,随机分为I组(15例)和II组(16例)。两组临床表现均有改善。虽然在II组中观察到明显的头部角度偏差,但在1周的随访中,两组在Dix Hallpike阴性和头晕严重程度方面的结果没有显著差异。结论虽然经验丰富的医生在传统的Epley手法中观察到头部角度的显著变化,但这些偏差是轻微的(小于15°),与在Epley手法中头部角度准确的组相比,在Dix Hallpike阴性和头晕的严重程度方面,这些偏差在1周时没有显著影响成功的治疗结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Audiology and Neuro-Otology
Audiology and Neuro-Otology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
35
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Audiology and Neurotology'' provides a forum for the publication of the most-advanced and rigorous scientific research related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear. This journal seeks submission of cutting edge research opening up new and innovative fields of study that may improve our understanding and treatment of patients with disorders of the auditory and vestibular systems, their central connections and their perception in the central nervous system. In addition to original papers the journal also offers invited review articles on current topics written by leading experts in the field. The journal is of primary importance for all scientists and practitioners interested in audiology, otology and neurotology, auditory neurosciences and related disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信