Impacts of severity and region of gill tissue resection on regeneration in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)

IF 2.1 3区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ensiyeh Ghanizadeh-Kazerouni , Dean J. Yoo , Simon R.M. Jones , Colin J. Brauner
{"title":"Impacts of severity and region of gill tissue resection on regeneration in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)","authors":"Ensiyeh Ghanizadeh-Kazerouni ,&nbsp;Dean J. Yoo ,&nbsp;Simon R.M. Jones ,&nbsp;Colin J. Brauner","doi":"10.1016/j.cbpa.2025.111815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In a previous study, we demonstrated successful regeneration of Atlantic salmon gill tissue following up to 50 % filament resection. The present study explored 1) the capacity of gill tissue to regenerate following more severe trauma, 2) if regeneration potential varies across regions of the arch, and 3) how tissue loss impacts the physiology of neighboring unresected filaments. Fish were divided between two resected groups and a control non-resected one. In resection group-1, fish underwent 50 % and 75 % resection in the ventral and medial-dorsal regions of the first arch, while in resection group-2, the location of resection levels was reversed. The degree of filament regeneration and physiology of unresected filaments were measured at 4, 12 and 20 weeks-post-resection (WPR). Overall, the degree of regeneration was significantly higher in 50 % resected filaments relative to 75 % resected filaments. The degree of regeneration did not differ significantly between the resected groups for either of resection levels, suggesting negligible impact of filament location on arch on regeneration. The concentration of oxidized glutathione (GSSG), total glutathione (GSH), and citrate synthase activity (CSA) in intact filaments were comparable between resected and control fish at both 4 and 20 WPR. However, GSH concentration varied among resected fish with those exhibited higher GSH in intact filaments showed lower regeneration of 50 % resected filaments at 20 WPR. Our results indicate that gill tissue loss exceeding 50 % may significantly impair regeneration and that this level of tissue loss is not associated with a compensatory response (e.g. GSSG, GSH, CSA) of neighboring gill tissue.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55237,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology","volume":"302 ","pages":"Article 111815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology A-Molecular & Integrative Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1095643325000133","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a previous study, we demonstrated successful regeneration of Atlantic salmon gill tissue following up to 50 % filament resection. The present study explored 1) the capacity of gill tissue to regenerate following more severe trauma, 2) if regeneration potential varies across regions of the arch, and 3) how tissue loss impacts the physiology of neighboring unresected filaments. Fish were divided between two resected groups and a control non-resected one. In resection group-1, fish underwent 50 % and 75 % resection in the ventral and medial-dorsal regions of the first arch, while in resection group-2, the location of resection levels was reversed. The degree of filament regeneration and physiology of unresected filaments were measured at 4, 12 and 20 weeks-post-resection (WPR). Overall, the degree of regeneration was significantly higher in 50 % resected filaments relative to 75 % resected filaments. The degree of regeneration did not differ significantly between the resected groups for either of resection levels, suggesting negligible impact of filament location on arch on regeneration. The concentration of oxidized glutathione (GSSG), total glutathione (GSH), and citrate synthase activity (CSA) in intact filaments were comparable between resected and control fish at both 4 and 20 WPR. However, GSH concentration varied among resected fish with those exhibited higher GSH in intact filaments showed lower regeneration of 50 % resected filaments at 20 WPR. Our results indicate that gill tissue loss exceeding 50 % may significantly impair regeneration and that this level of tissue loss is not associated with a compensatory response (e.g. GSSG, GSH, CSA) of neighboring gill tissue.

Abstract Image

鳃组织切除的严重程度和区域对大西洋鲑鱼再生的影响。
在之前的研究中,我们成功地证明了大西洋鲑鱼鳃组织再生后高达50% %的纤维切除。本研究探讨了1)严重创伤后鳃组织的再生能力,2)不同弓区的再生潜力是否不同,以及3)组织损失如何影响邻近未切除细丝的生理。鱼被分为两个切除组和一个未切除的对照组。在切除组1中,鱼在第一弓的腹侧和中背区进行了50% %和75% %的切除,而在切除组2中,切除水平的位置相反。在术后4、12和20 周(WPR)测量未切除细丝的再生程度和生理状况。总的来说,50% %的断丝的再生程度明显高于75% %的断丝。两组间的再生程度无显著差异,表明纤维位置对弓的影响可以忽略不计。在4 WPR和20 WPR时,完整纤维中氧化谷胱甘肽(GSSG)、总谷胱甘肽(GSH)浓度和柠檬酸合成酶活性(CSA)在切除鱼和对照鱼之间相当。然而,GSH浓度在被切除的鱼中有所不同,在完整的细丝中表现出较高的GSH的鱼在20 WPR时,被切除的细丝的再生率低于50% %。我们的研究结果表明,鳃组织损失超过50% %可能会严重损害再生,并且这种水平的组织损失与邻近鳃组织的代偿反应(例如GSSG, GSH, CSA)无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology of Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. This journal covers molecular, cellular, integrative, and ecological physiology. Topics include bioenergetics, circulation, development, excretion, ion regulation, endocrinology, neurobiology, nutrition, respiration, and thermal biology. Study on regulatory mechanisms at any level of organization such as signal transduction and cellular interaction and control of behavior are also published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信