Motivation, accountability, and outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of internet weight-loss programs in primary care.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Caitlin E Martinez, Brooke T Nezami, Amy A Gorin, Elizabeth Mayer-Davis, Erik A Willis, Christopher N Sciamanna, Deborah F Tate
{"title":"Motivation, accountability, and outcomes in a randomized controlled trial of internet weight-loss programs in primary care.","authors":"Caitlin E Martinez, Brooke T Nezami, Amy A Gorin, Elizabeth Mayer-Davis, Erik A Willis, Christopher N Sciamanna, Deborah F Tate","doi":"10.1177/13591053241309178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study explored whether baseline autonomous motivation (AM), controlled motivation (CM), and relative autonomy index (RAI) scores predicted 12-month weight in a three-arm randomized controlled trial of internet weight loss programs in primary care. It also evaluated perceived accountability to a primary care provider for weight loss as a moderator and study engagement (operationalized as weeks logged into the study website) as a mediator of these relationships. Participants with complete data for all model variables (<i>n</i> = 428) were included. Multiple linear regression models controlling for baseline weight and covariates showed that one-unit increases in baseline CM and RAI scores predicted a 0.57 kg increase (<i>p</i> = 0.015; Cohen's <i>f</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.02) and 0.52 kg decrease (<i>p</i> = 0.019; Cohen's <i>f</i><sup>2</sup> = 0.02) in weight, respectively. AM was not associated with 12-month weight. No moderating or mediating effects were found. Findings suggest the need for greater attention to baseline CM in weight loss programs in primary care.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"13591053241309178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241309178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored whether baseline autonomous motivation (AM), controlled motivation (CM), and relative autonomy index (RAI) scores predicted 12-month weight in a three-arm randomized controlled trial of internet weight loss programs in primary care. It also evaluated perceived accountability to a primary care provider for weight loss as a moderator and study engagement (operationalized as weeks logged into the study website) as a mediator of these relationships. Participants with complete data for all model variables (n = 428) were included. Multiple linear regression models controlling for baseline weight and covariates showed that one-unit increases in baseline CM and RAI scores predicted a 0.57 kg increase (p = 0.015; Cohen's f2 = 0.02) and 0.52 kg decrease (p = 0.019; Cohen's f2 = 0.02) in weight, respectively. AM was not associated with 12-month weight. No moderating or mediating effects were found. Findings suggest the need for greater attention to baseline CM in weight loss programs in primary care.

初级保健网络减肥项目随机对照试验的动机、责任和结果。
本研究探讨了基线自主动机(AM)、控制动机(CM)和相对自主指数(RAI)评分是否能预测初级保健网络减肥计划的三组随机对照试验中的12个月体重。它还评估了作为调节因素的对初级保健提供者的感知责任,以及作为这些关系的中介的学习参与(以登录研究网站的周数为单位进行操作)。纳入所有模型变量数据完整的参与者(n = 428)。控制基线体重和协变量的多元线性回归模型显示,基线CM和RAI评分增加1个单位预测0.57 kg增加(p = 0.015;Cohen’s f2 = 0.02),减少0.52 kg (p = 0.019;Cohen’s f2 = 0.02)。AM与12个月体重无关。没有发现调节或中介效应。研究结果表明,在初级保健减肥项目中,需要更多地关注基线CM。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信