Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: State-of-the-science update and narrative review.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Breton M Asken, Benjamin L Brett, William B Barr, Sarah Banks, Jennifer V Wethe, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Robert A Stern, Michael L Alosco
{"title":"Chronic traumatic encephalopathy: State-of-the-science update and narrative review.","authors":"Breton M Asken, Benjamin L Brett, William B Barr, Sarah Banks, Jennifer V Wethe, Kristen Dams-O'Connor, Robert A Stern, Michael L Alosco","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2454047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The long-recognized association of brain injury with increased risk of dementia has undergone significant refinement and more detailed study in recent decades. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a specific neurodegenerative tauopathy related to prior exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHI). We aim to contextualize CTE within a historical perspective and among emerging data which highlights the scientific and conceptual evolution of CTE-related research in parallel with the broader field of neurodegenerative disease and dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We provide a narrative state-of-the-science update on CTE neuropathology, clinical manifestations, biomarkers, different types and patterns of head impact exposure relevant for CTE, and the complicated influence of neurodegenerative co-pathology on symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Now almost 20 years since the initial case report of CTE in a former American football player, the field of CTE continues evolving with increasing clarity but also several ongoing controversies. Our understanding of CTE neuropathology outpaces that of disease-specific clinical correlates or the development of in-vivo biomarkers. Diagnostic criteria for symptoms attributable to CTE are still being validated, but leveraging increasingly available biomarkers for other conditions like Alzheimer's disease may be helpful for informing the CTE differential diagnosis. As diagnostic refinement efforts advance, clinicians should provide care and/or referrals to providers best suited to treat an individual patient's clinical symptoms, many of which have evidence-based behavioral treatment options that are etiologically agnostic. Several ongoing research initiatives and the gradual accrual of gold standard clinico-pathological data will pay dividends for advancing the many existing gaps in the field of CTE.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2454047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The long-recognized association of brain injury with increased risk of dementia has undergone significant refinement and more detailed study in recent decades. Chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE) is a specific neurodegenerative tauopathy related to prior exposure to repetitive head impacts (RHI). We aim to contextualize CTE within a historical perspective and among emerging data which highlights the scientific and conceptual evolution of CTE-related research in parallel with the broader field of neurodegenerative disease and dementia.

Methods: We provide a narrative state-of-the-science update on CTE neuropathology, clinical manifestations, biomarkers, different types and patterns of head impact exposure relevant for CTE, and the complicated influence of neurodegenerative co-pathology on symptoms.

Conclusions: Now almost 20 years since the initial case report of CTE in a former American football player, the field of CTE continues evolving with increasing clarity but also several ongoing controversies. Our understanding of CTE neuropathology outpaces that of disease-specific clinical correlates or the development of in-vivo biomarkers. Diagnostic criteria for symptoms attributable to CTE are still being validated, but leveraging increasingly available biomarkers for other conditions like Alzheimer's disease may be helpful for informing the CTE differential diagnosis. As diagnostic refinement efforts advance, clinicians should provide care and/or referrals to providers best suited to treat an individual patient's clinical symptoms, many of which have evidence-based behavioral treatment options that are etiologically agnostic. Several ongoing research initiatives and the gradual accrual of gold standard clinico-pathological data will pay dividends for advancing the many existing gaps in the field of CTE.

慢性创伤性脑病:最新的科学进展和叙述回顾。
目的:近几十年来,脑损伤与痴呆风险增加的长期公认的关联经历了显著的完善和更详细的研究。慢性创伤性脑病(CTE)是一种特定的神经退行性脑病,与先前暴露于重复性头部撞击(RHI)有关。我们的目标是在历史视角和新兴数据中背景化CTE,这些数据突出了CTE相关研究的科学和概念演变,同时也突出了更广泛的神经退行性疾病和痴呆领域。方法:我们提供了关于CTE神经病理学、临床表现、生物标志物、与CTE相关的不同类型和类型的头部撞击暴露以及神经退行性共同病理对症状的复杂影响的最新科学叙述。结论:自一名前美国橄榄球运动员CTE的首次病例报道以来,近20年来,CTE领域不断发展,越来越清晰,但也存在一些持续的争议。我们对CTE神经病理学的理解超过了对疾病特异性临床相关性或体内生物标志物的发展。CTE症状的诊断标准仍在验证中,但利用越来越多的其他疾病(如阿尔茨海默病)的生物标志物可能有助于CTE的鉴别诊断。随着诊断改进工作的推进,临床医生应该提供护理和/或转诊给最适合治疗个体患者临床症状的提供者,其中许多有基于证据的行为治疗方案,是病因不可知论的。一些正在进行的研究计划和逐渐积累的黄金标准临床病理数据将为推进CTE领域的许多现有差距带来红利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信