Matteo Tamburlani, Rossana Cuscito, Alessio D'Angelo, Giovanni Galeoto, Leonardo Papi, Ilaria Ruotolo, Francesca Santini, Annamaria Servadio, Edoardo Tirelli, Giovanni Sellitto
{"title":"Downhill: a new rehabilitation frontier. A systematic review of the literature.","authors":"Matteo Tamburlani, Rossana Cuscito, Alessio D'Angelo, Giovanni Galeoto, Leonardo Papi, Ilaria Ruotolo, Francesca Santini, Annamaria Servadio, Edoardo Tirelli, Giovanni Sellitto","doi":"10.4081/monaldi.2025.3071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In the last few years, we have seen the gradual spread of a new treadmill training modality, which involves walking not on the flat but downhill, also known as \"downhill\". This review aims to qualitatively assess the efficacy of downhill treatment on different patient populations and outline treatment routes for future efficacy studies. We searched five different databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PEDro, and LILACS for studies to include. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were considered. PEDro scales and Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) assessment were used to evaluate the risk of bias. Forty-one RCTs were included, and three articles remained to be analyzed; the included studies showed 110 participants for three RCTs; of these, two were performed on patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while one was for treating people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The outcome measures used in the studies were the pulmonary function test, the cardiopulmonary exercise test, the 6-Minute Walking Test, and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. In patients diagnosed with COPD, downhill training appears effective on functional capacity and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue, while in people with MS, it increases strength and activity performance when compared to other walking training modalities. RoB 2 tool shows good methodological quality for all studies included in the review; when evaluated with the PEDro scale, all presented a score of 8. Downhill could be such an effective, safe, and feasible eccentric training modality that it can be considered a new rehabilitation strategy that could be implemented for patients with low exercise tolerance.</p>","PeriodicalId":51593,"journal":{"name":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monaldi Archives for Chest Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/monaldi.2025.3071","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In the last few years, we have seen the gradual spread of a new treadmill training modality, which involves walking not on the flat but downhill, also known as "downhill". This review aims to qualitatively assess the efficacy of downhill treatment on different patient populations and outline treatment routes for future efficacy studies. We searched five different databases: MEDLINE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, PEDro, and LILACS for studies to include. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English were considered. PEDro scales and Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) assessment were used to evaluate the risk of bias. Forty-one RCTs were included, and three articles remained to be analyzed; the included studies showed 110 participants for three RCTs; of these, two were performed on patients diagnosed with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), while one was for treating people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The outcome measures used in the studies were the pulmonary function test, the cardiopulmonary exercise test, the 6-Minute Walking Test, and the St. George Respiratory Questionnaire. In patients diagnosed with COPD, downhill training appears effective on functional capacity and symptoms of dyspnea and fatigue, while in people with MS, it increases strength and activity performance when compared to other walking training modalities. RoB 2 tool shows good methodological quality for all studies included in the review; when evaluated with the PEDro scale, all presented a score of 8. Downhill could be such an effective, safe, and feasible eccentric training modality that it can be considered a new rehabilitation strategy that could be implemented for patients with low exercise tolerance.
在过去的几年里,我们看到了一种新的跑步机训练方式的逐渐传播,这种训练方式不是在平地上走,而是在下坡上走,也被称为“下坡”。本综述旨在定性评估下坡治疗对不同患者群体的疗效,并为未来的疗效研究概述治疗路线。我们检索了5个不同的数据库:MEDLINE、SCOPUS、Web of Science、PEDro和LILACS。只考虑用英文发表的随机对照试验(RCTs)。采用PEDro量表和2级偏倚风险(RoB 2)评价偏倚风险。纳入41项随机对照试验,还有3篇文章有待分析;纳入的研究为3项随机对照试验,共110名受试者;其中,两项用于诊断为慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的患者,一项用于治疗多发性硬化症(MS)患者。研究中使用的结果测量是肺功能测试、心肺运动测试、6分钟步行测试和圣乔治呼吸问卷。在诊断为COPD的患者中,下坡训练似乎对功能能力和呼吸困难和疲劳症状有效,而在MS患者中,与其他步行训练方式相比,下坡训练可以增加力量和活动表现。RoB 2工具显示纳入综述的所有研究的方法学质量良好;当用PEDro量表进行评估时,所有人的得分都是8分。下坡是一种有效、安全、可行的偏心训练方式,可以被认为是一种新的康复策略,可以用于低运动耐受性的患者。