Theory of mind in trichotillomania: A cross-sectional comparison with healthy controls.

IF 1.4 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Aslı Gönül Kaçar, Hasan Demirci, Efruz Pirdoğan Aydın
{"title":"Theory of mind in trichotillomania: A cross-sectional comparison with healthy controls.","authors":"Aslı Gönül Kaçar, Hasan Demirci, Efruz Pirdoğan Aydın","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2025.2453492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Theory of mind (ToM) is the ability to make correct inferences from one's own or another person's mental states, such as thoughts, beliefs, desires, and intentions. Although there are a limited number of studies in the literature examining the social cognitive functions of patients with trichotillomania (TTM), no studies have evaluated ToM. This study aimed to compare the ToM skills of patients with TTM and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included 40 patients who were diagnosed as having TTM according to DSM-5 criteria and 40 healthy controls matched for age, education, and sex. A Sociodemographic and Clinical Data Form, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and the Dokuz-Eylül Theory of Mind Scale (DEToMS) were administered to the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with TTM performed statistically significantly worse than healthy controls in terms of ToM, metaphor concept, empathic understanding, and faux pas scores. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of first-degree false belief, second-degree false belief, and irony concept scores. Depression, anxiety, and alexithymia scores of patients with TTM were statistically significantly higher than the control group. No significant correlation was found between ToM tests and anxiety, depression, alexithymia, disease severity, and disease duration in the TTM group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show that there is an impairment in ToM skills in patients with TTM and that this impairment is independent of clinical features. Studies with larger samples are needed on this subject.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2025.2453492","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Theory of mind (ToM) is the ability to make correct inferences from one's own or another person's mental states, such as thoughts, beliefs, desires, and intentions. Although there are a limited number of studies in the literature examining the social cognitive functions of patients with trichotillomania (TTM), no studies have evaluated ToM. This study aimed to compare the ToM skills of patients with TTM and healthy controls.

Method: The study included 40 patients who were diagnosed as having TTM according to DSM-5 criteria and 40 healthy controls matched for age, education, and sex. A Sociodemographic and Clinical Data Form, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Massachusetts General Hospital Hairpulling Scale (MGH-HPS), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET), and the Dokuz-Eylül Theory of Mind Scale (DEToMS) were administered to the participants.

Results: Patients with TTM performed statistically significantly worse than healthy controls in terms of ToM, metaphor concept, empathic understanding, and faux pas scores. No statistically significant difference was found between the groups in terms of first-degree false belief, second-degree false belief, and irony concept scores. Depression, anxiety, and alexithymia scores of patients with TTM were statistically significantly higher than the control group. No significant correlation was found between ToM tests and anxiety, depression, alexithymia, disease severity, and disease duration in the TTM group.

Conclusion: Our findings show that there is an impairment in ToM skills in patients with TTM and that this impairment is independent of clinical features. Studies with larger samples are needed on this subject.

拔毛癖的心理理论:与健康对照的横断面比较。
背景:心理理论(Theory of mind, ToM)是一种从自己或他人的心理状态(如思想、信仰、欲望和意图)中做出正确推论的能力。虽然文献中关于拔毛癖(TTM)患者社会认知功能的研究数量有限,但尚未有研究对其进行评估。本研究旨在比较TTM患者与健康对照者的ToM技能。方法:本研究包括40例根据DSM-5诊断为TTM的患者和40例年龄、教育程度和性别相匹配的健康对照。采用社会人口学和临床数据表、贝克抑郁量表(BDI)、贝克焦虑量表(BAI)、麻省总医院拔毛量表(MGH-HPS)、多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS-20)、眼读心术测试(RMET)和dokuz - eyl心理理论量表(DEToMS)。结果:TTM患者在ToM、隐喻概念、共情理解和失态得分方面的表现显著低于健康对照组。在一级错误信念、二级错误信念和反语概念得分方面,组间差异无统计学意义。TTM患者抑郁、焦虑、述情障碍评分均显著高于对照组。在TTM组中,ToM测试与焦虑、抑郁、述情障碍、疾病严重程度和疾病持续时间之间没有显著相关性。结论:我们的研究结果表明,TTM患者的ToM技能存在损害,并且这种损害与临床特征无关。在这个问题上需要更大样本的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信