{"title":"Measuring working memory span with WAIS-IV: Digit sequence is the superior span test.","authors":"Jens Egeland, Olaf Lund, Rune Raudeberg","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2024.2330998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Digit Span test has been part of the Wechsler tests from the first version. In the WAIS-IV the Digit Span Sequencing subtest (DSS) was introduced and in the forthcoming WAIS-5 working memory span will also be measured in the visual modality. The present study analyzes WAIS-IV Digit Span, Letter- Number Span (LNS) and WMS-III Spatial Span (SS) performance in a mixed clinical sample, expecting to find that Digit Span Forwards (DSF) lacks sensitivity to the Working Memory impairment evident in D-KEFS Trail Making Test-4 (TMT-4) scores ≤1 SD below normative means in the sample. The results showed DSF score above normative means, Digit Span Backwards (DSB) around mean, while SS and LNS was slightly impaired and DSS impaired at the same level as TMT- 4. A double dissociation was observed in DSF and SS performance between subjects with Language- and Non-verbal learning disorders. Most subjects scored in the average range on the LNS-span and high kurtosis reduced sensitivity. Taking LNS and TMT-4 as criterion measures of WM, regression analyses showed no unique contribution of DSF to the variance in these tests. The study supports prior critiques regarding the composite Digit Span measure and demonstrates that the DSS are more effective than the current version of LNS in identifying reduced Working Memory capacity.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2024.2330998","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Digit Span test has been part of the Wechsler tests from the first version. In the WAIS-IV the Digit Span Sequencing subtest (DSS) was introduced and in the forthcoming WAIS-5 working memory span will also be measured in the visual modality. The present study analyzes WAIS-IV Digit Span, Letter- Number Span (LNS) and WMS-III Spatial Span (SS) performance in a mixed clinical sample, expecting to find that Digit Span Forwards (DSF) lacks sensitivity to the Working Memory impairment evident in D-KEFS Trail Making Test-4 (TMT-4) scores ≤1 SD below normative means in the sample. The results showed DSF score above normative means, Digit Span Backwards (DSB) around mean, while SS and LNS was slightly impaired and DSS impaired at the same level as TMT- 4. A double dissociation was observed in DSF and SS performance between subjects with Language- and Non-verbal learning disorders. Most subjects scored in the average range on the LNS-span and high kurtosis reduced sensitivity. Taking LNS and TMT-4 as criterion measures of WM, regression analyses showed no unique contribution of DSF to the variance in these tests. The study supports prior critiques regarding the composite Digit Span measure and demonstrates that the DSS are more effective than the current version of LNS in identifying reduced Working Memory capacity.
期刊介绍:
pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.