Development and validation of the Information Literacy Measurement Scale (ILMS-34) in Chinese public health practitioners.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Hui Li, Ke-Ying Li, Xia-Rong Hu, Xuan Hong, Yan-Ting He, Hua-Wei Xiong, Yi-Li Zhang
{"title":"Development and validation of the Information Literacy Measurement Scale (ILMS-34) in Chinese public health practitioners.","authors":"Hui Li, Ke-Ying Li, Xia-Rong Hu, Xuan Hong, Yan-Ting He, Hua-Wei Xiong, Yi-Li Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12909-025-06693-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Public health professionals (PHPs) have increasing information needs to inform evidence-based public health decisions and practice, which requires good information literacy. A comprehensive and reliable assessment tool is necessary to assess PHPs' literacy and guide future promotion programs. However, there is a lack of measurement tools specifically for the information literacy of PHPs.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to develop an information literacy assessment tool for PHPs and test its psychometric properties among PHPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 34-item Information Literacy Measurement Scale (ILMS-34) for PHPs was developed based on an extensive literature review, the Delphi method, and pilot testing. The ILMS-34 was further validated among 526 PHPs recruited from four cities in Guangdong Province, China, using convenience sampling. The sample was randomly divided into two equal groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Other psychometric testing included item analysis, Cronbach's α coefficient, three-week test-retest reliability, and known-group validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>EFA yielded four dimensions for the ILMS-34: information consciousness, information knowledge, information ability, and information ethics. Subsequent CFA showed a good model fit of the four-factor structure (χ<sup>2</sup>/df = 1.485, RMSEA = 0.043, SRMR = 0.038, TLI = 0.977, CFI = 0.979). There were significant differences in each item between the high and low-scoring groups (p < 0.001), indicating good item discrimination. The ILMS-34 demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.97 for the total scale (four subscales: 0.92, 0.92, 0.98, and 0.91, respectively). It also showed good test-retest reliability after three weeks with an ICC coefficient of 0.67. The DSE-MS scores varied by various sample characteristics, verifying the known-group validity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The ILMS-34 is a multidimensional instrument with good psychometric properties and can be used as an effective tool to measure information literacy among PHPs. Further validation in other samples across various cultures is needed to test its broad application.</p>","PeriodicalId":51234,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Education","volume":"25 1","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-06693-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Public health professionals (PHPs) have increasing information needs to inform evidence-based public health decisions and practice, which requires good information literacy. A comprehensive and reliable assessment tool is necessary to assess PHPs' literacy and guide future promotion programs. However, there is a lack of measurement tools specifically for the information literacy of PHPs.

Objectives: This study aimed to develop an information literacy assessment tool for PHPs and test its psychometric properties among PHPs.

Methods: A 34-item Information Literacy Measurement Scale (ILMS-34) for PHPs was developed based on an extensive literature review, the Delphi method, and pilot testing. The ILMS-34 was further validated among 526 PHPs recruited from four cities in Guangdong Province, China, using convenience sampling. The sample was randomly divided into two equal groups for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), respectively. Other psychometric testing included item analysis, Cronbach's α coefficient, three-week test-retest reliability, and known-group validity.

Results: EFA yielded four dimensions for the ILMS-34: information consciousness, information knowledge, information ability, and information ethics. Subsequent CFA showed a good model fit of the four-factor structure (χ2/df = 1.485, RMSEA = 0.043, SRMR = 0.038, TLI = 0.977, CFI = 0.979). There were significant differences in each item between the high and low-scoring groups (p < 0.001), indicating good item discrimination. The ILMS-34 demonstrated good internal consistency with a Cronbach's α coefficient of 0.97 for the total scale (four subscales: 0.92, 0.92, 0.98, and 0.91, respectively). It also showed good test-retest reliability after three weeks with an ICC coefficient of 0.67. The DSE-MS scores varied by various sample characteristics, verifying the known-group validity.

Conclusion: The ILMS-34 is a multidimensional instrument with good psychometric properties and can be used as an effective tool to measure information literacy among PHPs. Further validation in other samples across various cultures is needed to test its broad application.

我国公共卫生从业人员信息素养测评量表(ILMS-34)的编制与验证
背景:公共卫生专业人员(PHPs)有越来越多的信息需求,为基于证据的公共卫生决策和实践提供信息,这需要良好的信息素养。需要一个全面可靠的评估工具来评估php的读写能力,并指导未来的推广计划。然而,缺乏专门针对php信息素养的测量工具。目的:本研究旨在开发一套面向大学生的信息素养测评工具,并对其心理测量特性进行测试。方法:在大量文献回顾、德尔菲法和中试测试的基础上,编制了34项信息素养量表(ILMS-34)。采用方便抽样的方法,从广东省4个城市招募526名PHPs对ILMS-34进行进一步验证。将样本随机分为两组,分别进行探索性因子分析(EFA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)。其他心理测试包括项目分析、Cronbach’s α系数、三周重测信度和已知组效度。结果:EFA得出了ILMS-34的四个维度:信息意识、信息知识、信息能力和信息伦理。随后的CFA显示四因素结构的模型拟合良好(χ2/df = 1.485, RMSEA = 0.043, SRMR = 0.038, TLI = 0.977, CFI = 0.979)。结论:ILMS-34量表是一种多维度的心理测量工具,具有良好的心理测量性能,可作为一种有效的信息素养测评工具。需要在不同文化背景的其他样本中进一步验证,以测试其广泛应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Education
BMC Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
795
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信