Adjunctive Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Studies.

IF 1.3 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Kai-Si Wen, Xin-Hu Yang, Nan Zhang, Si-Yuan Lin, Xing-Bing Huang, Todd Jackson, Yu-Tao Xiang, Wei Zheng
{"title":"Adjunctive Intermittent Theta-Burst Stimulation for Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Studies.","authors":"Kai-Si Wen, Xin-Hu Yang, Nan Zhang, Si-Yuan Lin, Xing-Bing Huang, Todd Jackson, Yu-Tao Xiang, Wei Zheng","doi":"10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In order to determine whether intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a viable adjunct treatment for schizophrenia, a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four independent researchers extracted and synthesized data from RCTs on adjunctive iTBS for patients suffering from schizophrenia. RevMan 5.3 software was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs involving 671 patients with schizophrenia were included. Adjunctive iTBS was significantly superior to sham interventions for improvement in overall psychopathology (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.10, -0.41, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 64%, <i>P</i> < .0001), negative symptoms (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.35, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 78%, <i>P</i> = .0003), and general psychopathology (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.88, -0.14, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 71%, <i>P</i> = .007), though no significant group difference was found regarding positive symptoms. Adjunctive iTBS also demonstrated superiority over control treatments in improving cognitive functions as measured by the Spatial Span Test (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.49, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 73%, <i>P</i> = .02) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.88, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>P</i> = .01). Discontinuation rates (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.50, <i>I</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0%, <i>P</i> = .75) and adverse events were comparable between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of iTBS in patients with schizophrenia appears to be effective in improving psychiatric symptoms and cognitive function. To substantiate these preliminary findings, future research involving larger participant cohorts is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":72151,"journal":{"name":"Alpha psychiatry","volume":"25 6","pages":"676-684"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11744375/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alpha psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241799","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In order to determine whether intermittent theta-burst stimulation (iTBS) is a viable adjunct treatment for schizophrenia, a meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized clinical trials (RCTs) was performed.

Methods: Four independent researchers extracted and synthesized data from RCTs on adjunctive iTBS for patients suffering from schizophrenia. RevMan 5.3 software was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) and standardized mean differences (SMDs) along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results: Fifteen RCTs involving 671 patients with schizophrenia were included. Adjunctive iTBS was significantly superior to sham interventions for improvement in overall psychopathology (SMD = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.10, -0.41, I 2 = 64%, P < .0001), negative symptoms (SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.35, I 2 = 78%, P = .0003), and general psychopathology (SMD = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.88, -0.14, I 2 = 71%, P = .007), though no significant group difference was found regarding positive symptoms. Adjunctive iTBS also demonstrated superiority over control treatments in improving cognitive functions as measured by the Spatial Span Test (SMD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.49, I 2 = 73%, P = .02) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.88, I 2 = 0%, P = .01). Discontinuation rates (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.50, I 2 = 0%, P = .75) and adverse events were comparable between groups.

Conclusion: The use of iTBS in patients with schizophrenia appears to be effective in improving psychiatric symptoms and cognitive function. To substantiate these preliminary findings, future research involving larger participant cohorts is warranted.

辅助间歇性爆发刺激治疗精神分裂症:随机双盲对照研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:为了确定间歇性脑波爆发刺激(iTBS)是否是精神分裂症的一种可行的辅助治疗方法,进行了一项双盲随机临床试验(rct)的荟萃分析。方法:4名独立研究人员从精神分裂症患者辅助iTBS的随机对照试验中提取并综合数据。采用RevMan 5.3软件计算风险比(rr)、标准化平均差(SMDs)及其95%置信区间(ci)。结果:纳入15项随机对照试验,涉及671例精神分裂症患者。辅助iTBS在改善整体精神病理(SMD = -0.75, 95% CI: -1.10, -0.41, i2 = 64%, P < 0.0001)、阴性症状(SMD = -0.76, 95% CI: -1.18, -0.35, i2 = 78%, P = 0.0003)和一般精神病理(SMD = -0.51, 95% CI: -0.88, -0.14, i2 = 71%, P = .007)方面显著优于假干预,但在阳性症状方面没有发现显著的组间差异。通过空间跨度测试(SMD = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.16, 1.49, i2 = 73%, P = 0.02)和蒙特利尔认知评估(SMD = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.88, i2 = 0%, P = 0.01),辅助iTBS在改善认知功能方面也优于对照治疗。停药率(RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.57, 1.50, i2 = 0%, P = 0.75)和不良事件在两组间具有可比性。结论:精神分裂症患者使用iTBS可有效改善精神症状和认知功能。为了证实这些初步发现,未来的研究需要涉及更大的参与者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信