The ChatGPT Fact-Check: Exploiting the Limitations of Generative AI to Develop Evidenced-Based Reasoning Skills in College Science Courses.

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Ursula Holzmann, Sulekha Anand, Alexander Y Payumo
{"title":"The ChatGPT Fact-Check: Exploiting the Limitations of Generative AI to Develop Evidenced-Based Reasoning Skills in College Science Courses.","authors":"Ursula Holzmann, Sulekha Anand, Alexander Y Payumo","doi":"10.1152/advan.00142.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Generative large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT can quickly produce informative essays on various topics. However, the information generated cannot be fully trusted as artificial intelligence (AI) can make factual mistakes. This poses challenges for using such tools in college classrooms. To address this, an adaptable assignment called the ChatGPT Fact-Check was developed to teach students in college science courses the benefits of using LLMs for topic exploration while emphasizing the importance of validating its claims based on evidence. The assignment requires students to use ChatGPT to generate essays, evaluate AI-generated sources, and assess the validity of AI-generated scientific claims (based on experimental evidence in primary sources). The assignment reinforces student learning around responsible AI use for exploration while maintaining evidence-based skepticism. The assignment meets objectives around efficiently leveraging beneficial features of AI, distinguishing evidence types, and evidence-based claim evaluation. Its adaptable nature allows integration across diverse courses to teach students to responsibly use AI for learning while maintaining a critical stance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50852,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Physiology Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Physiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00142.2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative large language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT can quickly produce informative essays on various topics. However, the information generated cannot be fully trusted as artificial intelligence (AI) can make factual mistakes. This poses challenges for using such tools in college classrooms. To address this, an adaptable assignment called the ChatGPT Fact-Check was developed to teach students in college science courses the benefits of using LLMs for topic exploration while emphasizing the importance of validating its claims based on evidence. The assignment requires students to use ChatGPT to generate essays, evaluate AI-generated sources, and assess the validity of AI-generated scientific claims (based on experimental evidence in primary sources). The assignment reinforces student learning around responsible AI use for exploration while maintaining evidence-based skepticism. The assignment meets objectives around efficiently leveraging beneficial features of AI, distinguishing evidence types, and evidence-based claim evaluation. Its adaptable nature allows integration across diverse courses to teach students to responsibly use AI for learning while maintaining a critical stance.

ChatGPT事实核查:利用生成式人工智能的局限性,在大学科学课程中培养基于证据的推理技能。
像ChatGPT这样的生成式大型语言模型(llm)可以快速生成关于各种主题的信息丰富的文章。然而,人工智能(AI)可能会犯事实性错误,因此产生的信息不能完全可信。这给在大学课堂上使用这些工具带来了挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们开发了一项名为ChatGPT Fact-Check的适应性作业,向大学理科课程的学生传授使用法学硕士进行主题探索的好处,同时强调基于证据验证其主张的重要性。作业要求学生使用ChatGPT生成文章,评估人工智能生成的来源,并评估人工智能生成的科学主张的有效性(基于主要来源的实验证据)。该作业强化了学生对负责任的人工智能用于探索的学习,同时保持了基于证据的怀疑态度。该作业满足了围绕有效利用人工智能的有益特征、区分证据类型和基于证据的索赔评估的目标。它的适应性允许整合不同的课程,教会学生在保持批判立场的同时负责任地使用人工智能进行学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
19.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Physiology Education promotes and disseminates educational scholarship in order to enhance teaching and learning of physiology, neuroscience and pathophysiology. The journal publishes peer-reviewed descriptions of innovations that improve teaching in the classroom and laboratory, essays on education, and review articles based on our current understanding of physiological mechanisms. Submissions that evaluate new technologies for teaching and research, and educational pedagogy, are especially welcome. The audience for the journal includes educators at all levels: K–12, undergraduate, graduate, and professional programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信