LGBTQ+ Adult Sexual Violence Critical Scoping Review: Victimization Risk Factors.

IF 5.4 1区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY
Jessica Ison, Sophie Hindes, Bianca Fileborn
{"title":"LGBTQ+ Adult Sexual Violence Critical Scoping Review: Victimization Risk Factors.","authors":"Jessica Ison, Sophie Hindes, Bianca Fileborn","doi":"10.1177/15248380241311930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Sexual violence experienced by LGBTQ+ adults is a rapidly expanding field of academic study. Therefore, there is a need for a synthesis and critical analysis of the research. The aim of this review was to conduct a critical review of the academic literature on adult LGBTQ+ sexual violence and to provide recommendations for future research. A total of 10,845 papers were identified through a comprehensive scoping review approach and 108 met the criteria for inclusion. The findings are reported across two papers. This second paper reports on the risk factors for victimization: alcohol and other drugs (AOD); homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, and minority stress; \"risky\" sexual behavior and HIV transmission; and child sexual abuse (CSA). AOD use was seen as a risk factor for sexual violence, yet the causal relationship was not always clear. Minority stress was conceived of as an individual issue with undertones of victim-blaming. \"Risky\" sexual behavior research, at times, framed LGBTQ+ sex as \"risky\" and failed to account for the specific needs of LGBTQ+ communities. Research on adult sexual violence risks had a focus on CSA that often neglected broader structural issues. In general, across the studies, there was a focus on individual-level research that analyzed survivor behavior, resulting in victim blaming. This paper advocates for expanding LGBTQ+ sexual violence research beyond just individual risk factors, shifting research away from constructing LGBTQ+ people as \"risky,\" and expanding research to include a more intersectional analysis that goes beyond heteronormative and cisnormative inquiry.</p>","PeriodicalId":54211,"journal":{"name":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","volume":" ","pages":"15248380241311930"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trauma Violence & Abuse","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380241311930","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sexual violence experienced by LGBTQ+ adults is a rapidly expanding field of academic study. Therefore, there is a need for a synthesis and critical analysis of the research. The aim of this review was to conduct a critical review of the academic literature on adult LGBTQ+ sexual violence and to provide recommendations for future research. A total of 10,845 papers were identified through a comprehensive scoping review approach and 108 met the criteria for inclusion. The findings are reported across two papers. This second paper reports on the risk factors for victimization: alcohol and other drugs (AOD); homophobia, biphobia, transphobia, and minority stress; "risky" sexual behavior and HIV transmission; and child sexual abuse (CSA). AOD use was seen as a risk factor for sexual violence, yet the causal relationship was not always clear. Minority stress was conceived of as an individual issue with undertones of victim-blaming. "Risky" sexual behavior research, at times, framed LGBTQ+ sex as "risky" and failed to account for the specific needs of LGBTQ+ communities. Research on adult sexual violence risks had a focus on CSA that often neglected broader structural issues. In general, across the studies, there was a focus on individual-level research that analyzed survivor behavior, resulting in victim blaming. This paper advocates for expanding LGBTQ+ sexual violence research beyond just individual risk factors, shifting research away from constructing LGBTQ+ people as "risky," and expanding research to include a more intersectional analysis that goes beyond heteronormative and cisnormative inquiry.

LGBTQ+成人性暴力关键范围审查:受害风险因素。
LGBTQ+成年人遭受的性暴力是一个迅速扩大的学术研究领域。因此,有必要对研究进行综合和批判性分析。本综述的目的是对成人LGBTQ+性暴力的学术文献进行批判性综述,并为未来的研究提供建议。通过全面的范围审查方法,共确定了10,845篇论文,其中108篇符合纳入标准。研究结果发表在两篇论文中。第二篇论文报告了受害的风险因素:酒精和其他药物(AOD);同性恋恐惧症、双性恋恐惧症、变性恐惧症和少数族裔压力;“危险”性行为和艾滋病毒传播;儿童性虐待(CSA)。AOD的使用被视为性暴力的一个风险因素,但其因果关系并不总是很清楚。少数族裔压力被认为是个人问题,带有责备受害者的意味。“危险的”性行为研究有时会将LGBTQ+的性行为定义为“危险的”,并没有考虑到LGBTQ+社区的具体需求。对成人性暴力风险的研究侧重于儿童性暴力,往往忽视了更广泛的结构性问题。总的来说,在所有的研究中,有一个重点是个人层面的研究,分析幸存者的行为,导致受害者责备。本文主张将LGBTQ+性暴力研究扩展到个体风险因素之外,将研究从将LGBTQ+人群构建为“有风险的”,并将研究扩展到包括更多交叉分析,超越异性恋规范和易规范的探究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is devoted to organizing, synthesizing, and expanding knowledge on all force of trauma, abuse, and violence. This peer-reviewed journal is practitioner oriented and will publish only reviews of research, conceptual or theoretical articles, and law review articles. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse is dedicated to professionals and advanced students in clinical training who work with any form of trauma, abuse, and violence. It is intended to compile knowledge that clearly affects practice, policy, and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信