'It's about collaboration': a whole-systems approach to understanding and promoting movement in Suffolk.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
A J Brinkley, K M Cusimano, P Freeman, R Southall-Edwards, V F Gladwell
{"title":"'It's about collaboration': a whole-systems approach to understanding and promoting movement in Suffolk.","authors":"A J Brinkley, K M Cusimano, P Freeman, R Southall-Edwards, V F Gladwell","doi":"10.1186/s12966-024-01688-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population-levels of physical activity have remained stagnant for years. Previous approaches to modify behaviour have broadly neglected the importance of whole-systems approaches. Our research aimed to (i) understand, (ii) map, (iii) identify the leverage points, and (iv) develop solutions surrounding participation in physical activity across an English rural county.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systems-consortium of partners from regional and local government, charities, providers, deliverers, advocacy groups, and health and social care, and public health engaged in our research, which consisted of two-phases. Within Phase 1, we used secondary data, insight-work, a narrative review, participatory workshops, and interviews in a pluralistic style to map the system-representing physical activity. Phase 2 began with an initial analysis using markers from social network analysis and the Action Scales Model. This analysis informed a participatory workshop, to identify leverage points, and develop solutions for change within the county.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The systems-map is constructed from biological, financial, and psychological individual factors, interpersonal factors, systems partners, built, natural and social environmental factors, and policy and structural factors. Our initial analysis found 13 leverage points to review within our participatory workshop. When appraised by the group, (i) local governing policies, (ii) shared policies, strategies, vision, and working relationships, (iii) shared facilities (school, sport, community, recreation), and (iv) funding were deemed most important to change. Within group discussions, participants stressed the importance and challenges associated with shared working relationships, a collective vision, and strategy, the role of funding, and management of resources. Actions to leverage change included raising awareness with partners beyond the system, sharing policies, resources, insight, evidence, and capacity, and collaborating to co-produce a collective vision and strategy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the importance and provide insight into the early phase of a whole-systems approach to promoting physical activity. Our whole-systems approach within Suffolk needs to consider methods to (i) grow and maintain the systems-consortium, (ii) create a sustainable means to map the system and identify leverage points within it, and (iii) monitor and evaluate change.</p>","PeriodicalId":50336,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","volume":"22 1","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11740498/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-024-01688-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population-levels of physical activity have remained stagnant for years. Previous approaches to modify behaviour have broadly neglected the importance of whole-systems approaches. Our research aimed to (i) understand, (ii) map, (iii) identify the leverage points, and (iv) develop solutions surrounding participation in physical activity across an English rural county.

Methods: A systems-consortium of partners from regional and local government, charities, providers, deliverers, advocacy groups, and health and social care, and public health engaged in our research, which consisted of two-phases. Within Phase 1, we used secondary data, insight-work, a narrative review, participatory workshops, and interviews in a pluralistic style to map the system-representing physical activity. Phase 2 began with an initial analysis using markers from social network analysis and the Action Scales Model. This analysis informed a participatory workshop, to identify leverage points, and develop solutions for change within the county.

Results: The systems-map is constructed from biological, financial, and psychological individual factors, interpersonal factors, systems partners, built, natural and social environmental factors, and policy and structural factors. Our initial analysis found 13 leverage points to review within our participatory workshop. When appraised by the group, (i) local governing policies, (ii) shared policies, strategies, vision, and working relationships, (iii) shared facilities (school, sport, community, recreation), and (iv) funding were deemed most important to change. Within group discussions, participants stressed the importance and challenges associated with shared working relationships, a collective vision, and strategy, the role of funding, and management of resources. Actions to leverage change included raising awareness with partners beyond the system, sharing policies, resources, insight, evidence, and capacity, and collaborating to co-produce a collective vision and strategy.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance and provide insight into the early phase of a whole-systems approach to promoting physical activity. Our whole-systems approach within Suffolk needs to consider methods to (i) grow and maintain the systems-consortium, (ii) create a sustainable means to map the system and identify leverage points within it, and (iii) monitor and evaluate change.

“这是关于合作”:一个整体系统的方法来理解和促进运动在萨福克。
背景:人口身体活动水平多年来一直停滞不前。以前改变行为的方法普遍忽视了整个系统方法的重要性。我们的研究旨在(i)理解,(ii)绘制地图,(iii)确定杠杆点,以及(iv)制定英国农村地区参与体育活动的解决方案。方法:我们的研究由来自地区和地方政府、慈善机构、提供者、交付者、倡导团体、卫生和社会保健以及公共卫生的合作伙伴组成的系统联盟参与,研究分为两个阶段。在第一阶段,我们使用二手数据、洞察工作、叙述性回顾、参与式研讨会和多元风格的访谈来绘制系统-代表身体活动。第二阶段开始使用社会网络分析和行动量表模型中的标记进行初步分析。这一分析为参与性研讨会提供了信息,以确定杠杆点,并为县内的变革制定解决方案。结果:系统图谱由生物、金融、心理个体因素、人际因素、系统伙伴因素、建筑、自然和社会环境因素以及政策和结构因素构成。我们的初步分析发现,在我们的参与式研讨会中,需要审查13个杠杆点。当小组评估时,(i)地方管理政策,(ii)共享政策、战略、愿景和工作关系,(iii)共享设施(学校、体育、社区、娱乐),以及(iv)资金被认为是最重要的改变。在小组讨论中,与会者强调了与共享工作关系、集体愿景和战略、供资的作用和资源管理相关的重要性和挑战。利用变革的行动包括提高与系统之外的合作伙伴的认识,分享政策、资源、见解、证据和能力,并合作共同制定集体愿景和战略。结论:我们的研究结果强调了促进身体活动的全系统方法的重要性,并为早期阶段提供了见解。我们在Suffolk的整体系统方法需要考虑以下方法:(i)发展和维护系统联盟,(ii)创建一个可持续的方法来绘制系统并确定其中的杠杆点,以及(iii)监测和评估变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (IJBNPA) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal offering high quality articles, rapid publication and wide diffusion in the public domain. IJBNPA is devoted to furthering the understanding of the behavioral aspects of diet and physical activity and is unique in its inclusion of multiple levels of analysis, including populations, groups and individuals and its inclusion of epidemiology, and behavioral, theoretical and measurement research areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信