Sophia R Newcomer, Sarah Y Michels, Alexandria N Albers, Rain E Freeman, Christina L Clarke, Jason M Glanz, Matthew F Daley
{"title":"Early Childhood Vaccination Coverage and Patterns by Rural-Urban Commuting Area.","authors":"Sophia R Newcomer, Sarah Y Michels, Alexandria N Albers, Rain E Freeman, Christina L Clarke, Jason M Glanz, Matthew F Daley","doi":"10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>National surveillance efforts have reported rural-urban disparities in childhood vaccination coverage by metropolitan statistical area designations, measured at the county level. This study's objective was to quantify vaccination trends using more discrete measures of coverage and rurality than prior work.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Serial, cross-sectional analyses of National Immunization Survey-Child restricted-use data collected in 2015-2021 for U.S. children born 2014-2018 were conducted. ZIP code of residence was merged with rural-urban commuting area codes. Vaccination coverage and patterns, including on-time receipt of recommended vaccines, were assessed using vaccinations recorded from birth through age 23 months. To determine whether trends differed by rurality, an interaction between birth year and RUCA was tested in multivariable regression models. Analyses were conducted in November 2023-January 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In nationally representative analyses of N=59,361 children, 87.7%, 7.1%, and 5.3% lived in urban, large rural, or small town/rural areas, respectively. Among children born in 2018, coverage for the combined 7-vaccine series was 71.2% (95% CI=69.6%, 72.9%) in urban, 64.9% (95% CI=58.8%, 71.0%) in large rural, and 62.6% (95% CI=56.2%, 68.9%) in small town/rural areas. There was a positive trend in on-time vaccination in urban areas (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] for birth year=1.06; 95% CI=1.05, 1.08). While the trend did not significantly differ for large rural versus urban areas (interaction aPR=1.02; 95% CI=0.96, 1.08), there was less improvement in on-time vaccination in small town/rural areas (interaction aPR=0.93; 95% CI=0.88, 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Increased efforts are needed to eliminate disparities in routine and on-time vaccination for rural children.</p>","PeriodicalId":50805,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Preventive Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2025.01.006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: National surveillance efforts have reported rural-urban disparities in childhood vaccination coverage by metropolitan statistical area designations, measured at the county level. This study's objective was to quantify vaccination trends using more discrete measures of coverage and rurality than prior work.
Methods: Serial, cross-sectional analyses of National Immunization Survey-Child restricted-use data collected in 2015-2021 for U.S. children born 2014-2018 were conducted. ZIP code of residence was merged with rural-urban commuting area codes. Vaccination coverage and patterns, including on-time receipt of recommended vaccines, were assessed using vaccinations recorded from birth through age 23 months. To determine whether trends differed by rurality, an interaction between birth year and RUCA was tested in multivariable regression models. Analyses were conducted in November 2023-January 2024.
Results: In nationally representative analyses of N=59,361 children, 87.7%, 7.1%, and 5.3% lived in urban, large rural, or small town/rural areas, respectively. Among children born in 2018, coverage for the combined 7-vaccine series was 71.2% (95% CI=69.6%, 72.9%) in urban, 64.9% (95% CI=58.8%, 71.0%) in large rural, and 62.6% (95% CI=56.2%, 68.9%) in small town/rural areas. There was a positive trend in on-time vaccination in urban areas (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] for birth year=1.06; 95% CI=1.05, 1.08). While the trend did not significantly differ for large rural versus urban areas (interaction aPR=1.02; 95% CI=0.96, 1.08), there was less improvement in on-time vaccination in small town/rural areas (interaction aPR=0.93; 95% CI=0.88, 0.99).
Conclusions: Increased efforts are needed to eliminate disparities in routine and on-time vaccination for rural children.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Preventive Medicine is the official journal of the American College of Preventive Medicine and the Association for Prevention Teaching and Research. It publishes articles in the areas of prevention research, teaching, practice and policy. Original research is published on interventions aimed at the prevention of chronic and acute disease and the promotion of individual and community health.
Of particular emphasis are papers that address the primary and secondary prevention of important clinical, behavioral and public health issues such as injury and violence, infectious disease, women''s health, smoking, sedentary behaviors and physical activity, nutrition, diabetes, obesity, and substance use disorders. Papers also address educational initiatives aimed at improving the ability of health professionals to provide effective clinical prevention and public health services. Papers on health services research pertinent to prevention and public health are also published. The journal also publishes official policy statements from the two co-sponsoring organizations, review articles, media reviews, and editorials. Finally, the journal periodically publishes supplements and special theme issues devoted to areas of current interest to the prevention community.