Challenges of Contemporary Practice: Internists Maintaining Competency in Multiple Specialties.

IF 1.6 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jason J Weiner, Steven J Durning, Anne Wildermuth
{"title":"Challenges of Contemporary Practice: Internists Maintaining Competency in Multiple Specialties.","authors":"Jason J Weiner, Steven J Durning, Anne Wildermuth","doi":"10.1097/CEH.0000000000000592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Despite increasing physician specialization, high-quality continuing professional development is needed for continual mastery learning, especially focused on multiple specialties. Board certification is considered a surrogate for competency, and some stakeholders consider it suboptimally aligned with its primary purpose. We set to explore the motivation for continued education and competence in physicians who are board certified in multiple specialties.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a qualitative study using thematic analysis. Semistructured interviews were performed virtually. Landscapes of practice, an extension of communities of practice within sociocultural learning theory, was used as a theoretical framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen internists and their related subspecialties performing continual board certification completed the study. We identified six themes describing the underlying motivation for why physicians maintain competency in multiple medical specialties: Social responsibility, Promise of expertise, Enhanced job opportunities, Widened expertise, Professional requirements, and Personal fulfillment.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The landscape of medicine continues to evolve in how it is practiced. How a physician navigates this process, maintaining their competency, is a continuous lifelong learning process, and there are multiple ways. A portion of internal medicine physicians are motivated to practice in multiple specialties, recognizing the opportunities and challenges involved. The practical application of this study would include organizational-based education focused on hybrid learning (education explicitly focusing on overlapping or cross-discipline fields). Despite a plethora of educational opportunities, there is very little with the focus on cross-discipline education and training.</p>","PeriodicalId":50218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEH.0000000000000592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Despite increasing physician specialization, high-quality continuing professional development is needed for continual mastery learning, especially focused on multiple specialties. Board certification is considered a surrogate for competency, and some stakeholders consider it suboptimally aligned with its primary purpose. We set to explore the motivation for continued education and competence in physicians who are board certified in multiple specialties.

Methods: We performed a qualitative study using thematic analysis. Semistructured interviews were performed virtually. Landscapes of practice, an extension of communities of practice within sociocultural learning theory, was used as a theoretical framework.

Results: Fifteen internists and their related subspecialties performing continual board certification completed the study. We identified six themes describing the underlying motivation for why physicians maintain competency in multiple medical specialties: Social responsibility, Promise of expertise, Enhanced job opportunities, Widened expertise, Professional requirements, and Personal fulfillment.

Discussion: The landscape of medicine continues to evolve in how it is practiced. How a physician navigates this process, maintaining their competency, is a continuous lifelong learning process, and there are multiple ways. A portion of internal medicine physicians are motivated to practice in multiple specialties, recognizing the opportunities and challenges involved. The practical application of this study would include organizational-based education focused on hybrid learning (education explicitly focusing on overlapping or cross-discipline fields). Despite a plethora of educational opportunities, there is very little with the focus on cross-discipline education and training.

当代实践的挑战:内科医生在多个专业保持能力。
导言:尽管医生专业化程度不断提高,但高质量的持续专业发展是持续掌握学习的必要条件,特别是在多个专业方面。董事会认证被认为是能力的替代品,一些利益相关者认为它与其主要目的不太理想。我们开始探索在多个专业获得委员会认证的医生继续教育和能力的动机。方法:采用专题分析进行定性研究。半结构化访谈是虚拟的。实践景观是社会文化学习理论中实践社区的延伸,被用作理论框架。结果:15名内科医生及其相关专科医师完成了本研究。我们确定了六个主题,描述了为什么医生在多个医学专业保持能力的潜在动机:社会责任、专业知识的承诺、增加的工作机会、扩大的专业知识、专业要求和个人成就感。讨论:医学的景观在如何实践中继续发展。医生如何驾驭这个过程,保持他们的能力,是一个持续的终身学习过程,有多种方法。一部分内科医生有动力在多个专业执业,认识到其中的机遇和挑战。本研究的实际应用将包括以混合型学习为重点的组织教育(明确关注重叠或跨学科领域的教育)。尽管有大量的教育机会,但对跨学科教育和培训的关注却很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
85
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Continuing Education is a quarterly journal publishing articles relevant to theory, practice, and policy development for continuing education in the health sciences. The journal presents original research and essays on subjects involving the lifelong learning of professionals, with a focus on continuous quality improvement, competency assessment, and knowledge translation. It provides thoughtful advice to those who develop, conduct, and evaluate continuing education programs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信