Responsiveness to transcutaneous spinal stimulation for upper extremity recovery following spinal cord injury: A case series exploration of midsagittal tissue bridges.
Andrew C Smith, Clare Morey, Wesley A Thornton, Jordan R Connor, Dario Pfyffer, Kenneth A Weber Ii, Kristin Will, Candace Tefertiller
{"title":"Responsiveness to transcutaneous spinal stimulation for upper extremity recovery following spinal cord injury: A case series exploration of midsagittal tissue bridges.","authors":"Andrew C Smith, Clare Morey, Wesley A Thornton, Jordan R Connor, Dario Pfyffer, Kenneth A Weber Ii, Kristin Will, Candace Tefertiller","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2448046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS), applied to the cervical spine, is able to improve voluntary upper extremity strength and function in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). While most respond and improve in the presence of TSS, others do not respond as favorably. Midsagittal tissue bridges, adjacent to the lesion, can be observed and measured using T<sub>2</sub>-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and both ventral and dorsal tissue bridges are associated with recovery following SCI. Tissue bridges may also be important for responding to neuromodulation such as TSS. The purpose of this case series was to explore potential relationships between the presence of tissue bridges and responsiveness to TSS for recovery of upper extremity strength and function in research participants with cervical-level SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved six research participants who completed a clinical trial of rehabilitation paired with TSS to improve upper extremity strength and function. Ventral and dorsal midsagittal tissue bridges were quantified using T<sub>2</sub>-weighted MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three participants classified as both strength and function responders showed presence of ventral tissue bridges, while the three strength-only responders did not. The same was found for dorsal tissue bridges, except for one strength-only responder that had a dorsal tissue bridge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this case series shed light onto the potential importance of midsagittal tissue bridges - a proxy for spared sensorimotor tracts - for responsiveness to TSS for upper extremity recovery following SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2448046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Context: Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS), applied to the cervical spine, is able to improve voluntary upper extremity strength and function in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). While most respond and improve in the presence of TSS, others do not respond as favorably. Midsagittal tissue bridges, adjacent to the lesion, can be observed and measured using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and both ventral and dorsal tissue bridges are associated with recovery following SCI. Tissue bridges may also be important for responding to neuromodulation such as TSS. The purpose of this case series was to explore potential relationships between the presence of tissue bridges and responsiveness to TSS for recovery of upper extremity strength and function in research participants with cervical-level SCI.
Methods: This study involved six research participants who completed a clinical trial of rehabilitation paired with TSS to improve upper extremity strength and function. Ventral and dorsal midsagittal tissue bridges were quantified using T2-weighted MRI.
Results: Three participants classified as both strength and function responders showed presence of ventral tissue bridges, while the three strength-only responders did not. The same was found for dorsal tissue bridges, except for one strength-only responder that had a dorsal tissue bridge.
Conclusions: The findings of this case series shed light onto the potential importance of midsagittal tissue bridges - a proxy for spared sensorimotor tracts - for responsiveness to TSS for upper extremity recovery following SCI.
期刊介绍:
For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.