Responsiveness to transcutaneous spinal stimulation for upper extremity recovery following spinal cord injury: A case series exploration of midsagittal tissue bridges.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Andrew C Smith, Clare Morey, Wesley A Thornton, Jordan R Connor, Dario Pfyffer, Kenneth A Weber Ii, Kristin Will, Candace Tefertiller
{"title":"Responsiveness to transcutaneous spinal stimulation for upper extremity recovery following spinal cord injury: A case series exploration of midsagittal tissue bridges.","authors":"Andrew C Smith, Clare Morey, Wesley A Thornton, Jordan R Connor, Dario Pfyffer, Kenneth A Weber Ii, Kristin Will, Candace Tefertiller","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2448046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS), applied to the cervical spine, is able to improve voluntary upper extremity strength and function in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). While most respond and improve in the presence of TSS, others do not respond as favorably. Midsagittal tissue bridges, adjacent to the lesion, can be observed and measured using T<sub>2</sub>-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and both ventral and dorsal tissue bridges are associated with recovery following SCI. Tissue bridges may also be important for responding to neuromodulation such as TSS. The purpose of this case series was to explore potential relationships between the presence of tissue bridges and responsiveness to TSS for recovery of upper extremity strength and function in research participants with cervical-level SCI.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved six research participants who completed a clinical trial of rehabilitation paired with TSS to improve upper extremity strength and function. Ventral and dorsal midsagittal tissue bridges were quantified using T<sub>2</sub>-weighted MRI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three participants classified as both strength and function responders showed presence of ventral tissue bridges, while the three strength-only responders did not. The same was found for dorsal tissue bridges, except for one strength-only responder that had a dorsal tissue bridge.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings of this case series shed light onto the potential importance of midsagittal tissue bridges - a proxy for spared sensorimotor tracts - for responsiveness to TSS for upper extremity recovery following SCI.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2448046","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS), applied to the cervical spine, is able to improve voluntary upper extremity strength and function in individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). While most respond and improve in the presence of TSS, others do not respond as favorably. Midsagittal tissue bridges, adjacent to the lesion, can be observed and measured using T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and both ventral and dorsal tissue bridges are associated with recovery following SCI. Tissue bridges may also be important for responding to neuromodulation such as TSS. The purpose of this case series was to explore potential relationships between the presence of tissue bridges and responsiveness to TSS for recovery of upper extremity strength and function in research participants with cervical-level SCI.

Methods: This study involved six research participants who completed a clinical trial of rehabilitation paired with TSS to improve upper extremity strength and function. Ventral and dorsal midsagittal tissue bridges were quantified using T2-weighted MRI.

Results: Three participants classified as both strength and function responders showed presence of ventral tissue bridges, while the three strength-only responders did not. The same was found for dorsal tissue bridges, except for one strength-only responder that had a dorsal tissue bridge.

Conclusions: The findings of this case series shed light onto the potential importance of midsagittal tissue bridges - a proxy for spared sensorimotor tracts - for responsiveness to TSS for upper extremity recovery following SCI.

脊髓损伤后上肢恢复对经皮脊髓刺激的反应性:矢状中组织桥的病例系列研究。
背景:应用于颈椎的经皮脊髓刺激(TSS)能够改善颈脊髓损伤(SCI)患者的自愿上肢力量和功能。虽然大多数人对TSS有反应并有所改善,但其他人的反应并不积极。与病变相邻的正中矢状面组织桥可以通过t2加权磁共振成像(MRI)观察和测量,腹侧和背侧组织桥都与脊髓损伤后的恢复有关。组织桥可能对神经调节(如TSS)的反应也很重要。本病例系列的目的是探讨组织桥的存在与TSS对颈椎级脊髓损伤患者上肢力量和功能恢复的反应性之间的潜在关系。方法:本研究涉及6名研究参与者,他们完成了康复配合TSS改善上肢力量和功能的临床试验。采用t2加权MRI对腹侧和背侧正中矢状面组织桥进行量化。结果:三名同时被分类为力量和功能应答者的参与者显示出腹侧组织桥的存在,而三名仅力量应答者则没有。在背侧组织桥上也发现了同样的结果,除了一个只有力量的应答者有背侧组织桥。结论:本病例系列的研究结果揭示了正中矢状组织桥的潜在重要性——一种备用感觉运动束的代表——对于脊髓损伤后上肢恢复对TSS的反应性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信