Prescription opioid dispensing rates in the 12-months post-discharge after acute spinal cord injury: An observational study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Samantha J Borg, David N Borg, Amanda Wheeler, Sridhar Atresh, Timothy Geraghty
{"title":"Prescription opioid dispensing rates in the 12-months post-discharge after acute spinal cord injury: An observational study.","authors":"Samantha J Borg, David N Borg, Amanda Wheeler, Sridhar Atresh, Timothy Geraghty","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2448043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine rates of opioid and concomitant antidepressant, anticonvulsant and benzodiazepine dispensing in the post-discharge period, after acute spinal cord injury (SCI).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Single-center prospective cohort study with 12-month linked pharmaceutical data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Community pharmaceutical dispensing.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Patients ≥18 who were diagnosed with a SCI between March 2017 and March 2018.</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Rates of dispensing of opioid and concomitant antidepressant, anticonvulsant and benzodiazepine medications in the 12-month post-discharge from a specialist inpatient Spinal Injuries Unit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-eight participants volunteered for the study. Of the medications dispensed in the 12-months after discharge, 16% were opioids, which were supplied to 56% of participants. Forty-six percent of participants had concurrent dispensing of at least one other medication class of interest (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or benzodiazepines). Participants with opioids prescribed at discharge were 6.5 times more likely to have been dispensed opioids in the 12-months following discharge compared to those who did not have opioids listed at discharge (OR = 6.5, 95% CI = 2.2, 19.0, P<i> </i>< .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Longer-term opioid prescribing plus concomitant analgesia and sleep medications in the post-acute period after SCI were common. Chronic opioid use and the polypharmacy observed is concerning, given the potential for dependence, tolerance and increased drug interactions and associated adverse effects. Both issues point to the need for clear discharge instructions for primary care prescribers and regular monitoring to manage pharmacotherapy therapeutic benefits and risks alongside non-medication therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2448043","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine rates of opioid and concomitant antidepressant, anticonvulsant and benzodiazepine dispensing in the post-discharge period, after acute spinal cord injury (SCI).

Design: Single-center prospective cohort study with 12-month linked pharmaceutical data.

Setting: Community pharmaceutical dispensing.

Participants: Patients ≥18 who were diagnosed with a SCI between March 2017 and March 2018.

Outcome measures: Rates of dispensing of opioid and concomitant antidepressant, anticonvulsant and benzodiazepine medications in the 12-month post-discharge from a specialist inpatient Spinal Injuries Unit.

Results: Sixty-eight participants volunteered for the study. Of the medications dispensed in the 12-months after discharge, 16% were opioids, which were supplied to 56% of participants. Forty-six percent of participants had concurrent dispensing of at least one other medication class of interest (antidepressants, anticonvulsants, or benzodiazepines). Participants with opioids prescribed at discharge were 6.5 times more likely to have been dispensed opioids in the 12-months following discharge compared to those who did not have opioids listed at discharge (OR = 6.5, 95% CI = 2.2, 19.0, P< .001).

Conclusions: Longer-term opioid prescribing plus concomitant analgesia and sleep medications in the post-acute period after SCI were common. Chronic opioid use and the polypharmacy observed is concerning, given the potential for dependence, tolerance and increased drug interactions and associated adverse effects. Both issues point to the need for clear discharge instructions for primary care prescribers and regular monitoring to manage pharmacotherapy therapeutic benefits and risks alongside non-medication therapies.

急性脊髓损伤出院后12个月处方阿片类药物配药率:一项观察性研究。
目的:了解急性脊髓损伤(SCI)患者出院后阿片类药物及同时使用抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药和苯二氮卓类药物的比例。设计:采用12个月相关药物数据的单中心前瞻性队列研究。工作地点:社区药品调剂。参与者:2017年3月至2018年3月期间诊断为SCI的≥18例患者。结果测量:从脊柱损伤专科住院病房出院后12个月内阿片类药物和伴随抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药和苯二氮卓类药物的配药率。结果:68名参与者自愿参加了这项研究。在出院后12个月内分配的药物中,16%是阿片类药物,56%的参与者使用了阿片类药物。46%的参与者同时配药至少一种其他感兴趣的药物(抗抑郁药、抗惊厥药或苯二氮卓类药物)。出院时开具阿片类药物处方的参与者在出院后12个月内配发阿片类药物的可能性是未开具阿片类药物的参与者的6.5倍(OR = 6.5, 95% CI = 2.2, 19.0, P)。结论:长期开具阿片类药物处方并同时服用镇痛药和睡眠药物在脊髓损伤后急性期是常见的。鉴于潜在的依赖性、耐受性和药物相互作用增加以及相关的不良反应,慢性阿片类药物使用和观察到的多种用药令人担忧。这两个问题都表明,需要为初级保健开处方者提供明确的出院说明,并定期监测,以管理药物治疗的益处和风险,同时进行非药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信