Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Shinogu Kusano, Kazuhiro Miyata, Kenichi Yoshikawa, Masafumi Mizukami
{"title":"Construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI).","authors":"Shinogu Kusano, Kazuhiro Miyata, Kenichi Yoshikawa, Masafumi Mizukami","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2448039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We investigated the construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI) to determine its usefulness in measuring the functional level of gait.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This was a prospective observational study following the checklist of the Consensus-Based Standards for Selecting Health Measurement Instruments. The SCI-FAI consists of three items: Gait Parameter, Assistive Devices, and Temporal. We recruited 55 patients diagnosed with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in the subacute or chronic phase from Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital. Construct validity was clarified by hypothesis testing and the rate of hypothesis verification. We divided responsiveness into subacute and chronic groups and determined the correlation between the changes in the two timepoints of the SCI-FAI and 6-minute walk test. Interpretability involved the calculation of cutoff values for indoor and outdoor walking.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Construct validity was confirmed for 12 of the 15 hypotheses, indicating high construct validity. In the subacute group, Gait Parameter and Assistive Devices showed moderate responsiveness. Interpretability showed that the Gait Parameter was perfect in 19 of the 20 subjects who did not need a walking aid when walking. The cutoff value for Gait Parameter for indoor walking was 17.5 points (AUC 0.91) and that for Assistive Devices was 9.5 points (AUC 0.88). The cutoff values for outdoor walking were Gait Parameter 18.5 points (AUC 0.96) and Assistive Devices 10.5 points (AUC 0.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results demonstrated that the SCI-FAI has adequate construct validity, moderate responsiveness in SCI patients in the subacute phase, and interpretability in the gait assessment of individuals with SCIs. Gait Parameter is likely to show a ceiling effect for people with SCIs who can walk without using an upper-limb walking aid.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2448039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We investigated the construct validity, responsiveness, and interpretability of the Spinal Cord Injury Functional Ambulation Inventory (SCI-FAI) to determine its usefulness in measuring the functional level of gait.

Patients and methods: This was a prospective observational study following the checklist of the Consensus-Based Standards for Selecting Health Measurement Instruments. The SCI-FAI consists of three items: Gait Parameter, Assistive Devices, and Temporal. We recruited 55 patients diagnosed with a spinal cord injury (SCI) in the subacute or chronic phase from Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences Hospital. Construct validity was clarified by hypothesis testing and the rate of hypothesis verification. We divided responsiveness into subacute and chronic groups and determined the correlation between the changes in the two timepoints of the SCI-FAI and 6-minute walk test. Interpretability involved the calculation of cutoff values for indoor and outdoor walking.

Results: Construct validity was confirmed for 12 of the 15 hypotheses, indicating high construct validity. In the subacute group, Gait Parameter and Assistive Devices showed moderate responsiveness. Interpretability showed that the Gait Parameter was perfect in 19 of the 20 subjects who did not need a walking aid when walking. The cutoff value for Gait Parameter for indoor walking was 17.5 points (AUC 0.91) and that for Assistive Devices was 9.5 points (AUC 0.88). The cutoff values for outdoor walking were Gait Parameter 18.5 points (AUC 0.96) and Assistive Devices 10.5 points (AUC 0.94).

Conclusion: Our results demonstrated that the SCI-FAI has adequate construct validity, moderate responsiveness in SCI patients in the subacute phase, and interpretability in the gait assessment of individuals with SCIs. Gait Parameter is likely to show a ceiling effect for people with SCIs who can walk without using an upper-limb walking aid.

构建脊髓损伤功能活动量表(SCI-FAI)的效度、反应性和可解释性。
目的:研究脊髓损伤功能行走量表(SCI-FAI)的结构效度、反应性和可解释性,以确定其在测量步态功能水平方面的有效性。患者和方法:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,遵循基于共识的健康测量工具选择标准清单。SCI-FAI包括三个项目:步态参数、辅助装置和颞叶。我们从茨城县卫生科学大学医院招募了55名诊断为亚急性或慢性期脊髓损伤(SCI)的患者。通过假设检验和假设验证率来澄清结构效度。我们将反应性分为亚急性组和慢性组,并确定SCI-FAI和6分钟步行测试两个时间点变化之间的相关性。可解释性涉及室内和室外步行截止值的计算。结果:15个假设中有12个的结构效度得到证实,表明结构效度较高。在亚急性组,步态参数和辅助装置表现出中度反应。可解释性表明,20名受试者中有19名在行走时不需要助行器,步态参数是完美的。室内步行的步态参数截断值为17.5分(AUC 0.91),辅助器具的步态参数截断值为9.5分(AUC 0.88)。户外步行的截断值为步态参数18.5分(AUC 0.96)和辅助器具10.5分(AUC 0.94)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,SCI- fai具有足够的结构效度,在脊髓损伤患者的亚急性期具有中等的反应性,并且在脊髓损伤患者的步态评估中具有可解释性。步态参数可能会显示出一个天花板效应,对于那些不使用上肢助行器就能行走的SCIs患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信