[Utilization of healthcare services by young adults with first psychotic episodes at the FRITZ am Urban in Berlin considering the migration background].

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Miriam Bernhardt, Stefan Siebert, Johanna Baumgardt, Olga Maria Domanska, Karolina Leopold, Andreas Bechdolf
{"title":"[Utilization of healthcare services by young adults with first psychotic episodes at the FRITZ am Urban in Berlin considering the migration background].","authors":"Miriam Bernhardt, Stefan Siebert, Johanna Baumgardt, Olga Maria Domanska, Karolina Leopold, Andreas Bechdolf","doi":"10.1007/s00115-024-01777-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In Germany, there are hardly any studies that investigated the care pathways in the early course of psychosis and the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and took the migration background into account.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study examined whether young adults with (PwM) and without a migration background (PoM) who had a first psychotic episode or first contact with the psychiatric care system within the last 5 years differ in their utilization of care services and DUP.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The data collection and post hoc analyses were carried out as a part of a cohort study (84 inpatients) at the Early Intervention and Therapy Center (FRITZ) in Berlin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The number of PwM (n = 38) who experienced a first psychotic episode did not significantly differ from the comparison group (PoM, n = 46) in the utilization of healthcare services (p = 0.22). Neither the time until seeking help from the first service nor the number of contacts with healthcare services and DUP significantly differed between PwM and Pom. The PwM were predominantly young adults with a good education background who grew up in Germany.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Users sought help at FRITZ relatively quickly, independent of their migration background, which supports further implementation of specialized early detection and intervention services in Germany. The results could be attributed to the selection of the study population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Further studies are needed that address people with lower education and low language skills. The early detection programs and awareness campaigns should be adapted to this target group.</p>","PeriodicalId":49770,"journal":{"name":"Nervenarzt","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nervenarzt","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00115-024-01777-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In Germany, there are hardly any studies that investigated the care pathways in the early course of psychosis and the duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and took the migration background into account.

Objective: The study examined whether young adults with (PwM) and without a migration background (PoM) who had a first psychotic episode or first contact with the psychiatric care system within the last 5 years differ in their utilization of care services and DUP.

Material and methods: The data collection and post hoc analyses were carried out as a part of a cohort study (84 inpatients) at the Early Intervention and Therapy Center (FRITZ) in Berlin.

Results: The number of PwM (n = 38) who experienced a first psychotic episode did not significantly differ from the comparison group (PoM, n = 46) in the utilization of healthcare services (p = 0.22). Neither the time until seeking help from the first service nor the number of contacts with healthcare services and DUP significantly differed between PwM and Pom. The PwM were predominantly young adults with a good education background who grew up in Germany.

Discussion: Users sought help at FRITZ relatively quickly, independent of their migration background, which supports further implementation of specialized early detection and intervention services in Germany. The results could be attributed to the selection of the study population.

Conclusion: Further studies are needed that address people with lower education and low language skills. The early detection programs and awareness campaigns should be adapted to this target group.

[考虑到移民背景,在柏林城市FRITZ首次精神病发作的年轻成年人的医疗保健服务的利用]。
背景:在德国,几乎没有研究调查精神病早期病程的护理途径和未治疗精神病(DUP)的持续时间,并考虑到移民背景。目的:本研究考察了在过去5年内首次精神病发作或首次接触精神科护理系统的年轻成年(PwM)和无移民背景(PoM)在护理服务和DUP的利用方面是否存在差异。材料和方法:数据收集和事后分析是柏林早期干预和治疗中心(FRITZ)一项队列研究(84名住院患者)的一部分。结果:首次精神病发作的PwM患者(n = 38)与对照组(n = 46)在医疗服务利用方面无显著差异(p = 0.22)。在向第一个服务机构寻求帮助之前的时间,以及与医疗保健服务机构和DUP接触的次数,在PwM和Pom之间都没有显著差异。PwM主要是在德国长大的受过良好教育的年轻人。讨论:用户在FRITZ寻求帮助相对较快,独立于他们的移民背景,这支持在德国进一步实施专门的早期检测和干预服务。结果可能归因于研究人群的选择。结论:针对受教育程度较低和语言技能较低的人群,需要进一步的研究。早期检测方案和宣传活动应适应这一目标群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nervenarzt
Nervenarzt 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
169
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Der Nervenarzt is an internationally recognized journal addressing neurologists and psychiatrists working in clinical or practical environments. Essential findings and current information from neurology, psychiatry as well as neuropathology, neurosurgery up to psychotherapy are presented. Review articles provide an overview on selected topics and offer the reader a summary of current findings from all fields of neurology and psychiatry. Freely submitted original papers allow the presentation of important clinical studies and serve the scientific exchange. Review articles under the rubric ''Continuing Medical Education'' present verified results of scientific research and their integration into daily practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信