Fishers and First Responders: Oil Spill Safety Workshop Design and Evaluation.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of Agromedicine Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1080/1059924X.2025.2452301
Frances Sentilles, Louise O R Machado, Mercy Neal, Luiza Monteiro Barros, Tiala Santana Santos, Mariana Nascimento Carvalho, José Erivaldo Gonçalves, Marciane Nunes Cardoso, Verônica Moitinho Sena, Jaquayla Devon Hodges, Rita Franco Rêgo
{"title":"Fishers and First Responders: Oil Spill Safety Workshop Design and Evaluation.","authors":"Frances Sentilles, Louise O R Machado, Mercy Neal, Luiza Monteiro Barros, Tiala Santana Santos, Mariana Nascimento Carvalho, José Erivaldo Gonçalves, Marciane Nunes Cardoso, Verônica Moitinho Sena, Jaquayla Devon Hodges, Rita Franco Rêgo","doi":"10.1080/1059924X.2025.2452301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This paper describes the design and evaluation of a workshop created to develop safer disaster response strategies for fishing communities, using the 2019 Northeast Brazil Oil Spill as a starting point for community-engaged education.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The 3-day pilot workshop included presentations, structured discussions, and interactive activities with small-scale fishers (SSFs), university researchers, and representatives of local government agencies. The workshop was evaluated through a mixed-method approach that considered qualitative data from discussion groups, collectively built products, and content retention. Evaluation methods were designed to contribute to participant learning while collecting information to improve the workshop's design.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The workshop succeeded in identifying harm reduction strategies for SSFs in the face of chemical spills, as well as in connecting them with government agencies that can provide support. Feedback from facilitators and participants was largely positive, emphasizing the accessibility of the event, participant enthusiasm, and the importance of the content for SSFs' safety. In evaluating content retention, nearly all content was understood and could be explained effectively by the SSF participants. Products of the workshop that the community can refer to in the future include community-produced videos about safety in encounters with petrochemicals and two flowcharts that outline disaster response strategies.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Community education and participatory frameworks support rich learning experiences around community health, with benefits for researchers and SSF participants. This workshop built on experiences from the 2019 oil spill to develop safer chemical spill response strategies that consider resource availability in the target community. Future events could build from this base to prepare for other kinds of disasters, like floods and storms. This event aims to reduce harm to SSFs, but government and professional first responder support remains essential to ensure safe disaster response due to a lack of safe, accessible protocols for such events.</p>","PeriodicalId":49172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agromedicine","volume":" ","pages":"330-340"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agromedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1059924X.2025.2452301","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This paper describes the design and evaluation of a workshop created to develop safer disaster response strategies for fishing communities, using the 2019 Northeast Brazil Oil Spill as a starting point for community-engaged education.

Methods: The 3-day pilot workshop included presentations, structured discussions, and interactive activities with small-scale fishers (SSFs), university researchers, and representatives of local government agencies. The workshop was evaluated through a mixed-method approach that considered qualitative data from discussion groups, collectively built products, and content retention. Evaluation methods were designed to contribute to participant learning while collecting information to improve the workshop's design.

Results: The workshop succeeded in identifying harm reduction strategies for SSFs in the face of chemical spills, as well as in connecting them with government agencies that can provide support. Feedback from facilitators and participants was largely positive, emphasizing the accessibility of the event, participant enthusiasm, and the importance of the content for SSFs' safety. In evaluating content retention, nearly all content was understood and could be explained effectively by the SSF participants. Products of the workshop that the community can refer to in the future include community-produced videos about safety in encounters with petrochemicals and two flowcharts that outline disaster response strategies.

Conclusion: Community education and participatory frameworks support rich learning experiences around community health, with benefits for researchers and SSF participants. This workshop built on experiences from the 2019 oil spill to develop safer chemical spill response strategies that consider resource availability in the target community. Future events could build from this base to prepare for other kinds of disasters, like floods and storms. This event aims to reduce harm to SSFs, but government and professional first responder support remains essential to ensure safe disaster response due to a lack of safe, accessible protocols for such events.

渔民和第一响应者:溢油安全车间设计与评估。
目的:本文描述了一个研讨会的设计和评估,该研讨会旨在为渔业社区制定更安全的灾害应对战略,以2019年巴西东北部漏油事件为起点,开展社区参与教育。方法:为期3天的试点研讨会包括演讲、结构化讨论以及与小规模渔民、大学研究人员和地方政府机构代表的互动活动。研讨会通过混合方法进行评估,该方法考虑了来自讨论组、集体构建的产品和内容保留的定性数据。评估方法旨在帮助参与者学习,同时收集信息以改进工作坊的设计。结果:讲习班成功地确定了ssf在面对化学品泄漏时的减少危害战略,并将它们与能够提供支持的政府机构联系起来。主持人和参与者的反馈大多是积极的,强调了活动的可及性、参与者的热情以及内容对ssf安全的重要性。在评估内容保留时,几乎所有的内容都被SSF参与者理解并能有效地解释。社区今后可以参考的讲习班产品包括社区制作的关于与石化产品接触时的安全问题的视频和两个概述灾害应对战略的流程图。结论:社区教育和参与性框架支持丰富的社区卫生学习经验,对研究人员和SSF参与者有利。本次研讨会以2019年溢油事故的经验为基础,制定了更安全的化学品溢油应对策略,并考虑了目标社区的资源可用性。未来的事件可以建立在这个基础上,为其他类型的灾难做准备,比如洪水和风暴。该事件旨在减少对ssf的伤害,但由于缺乏针对此类事件的安全、可访问的协议,政府和专业第一响应者的支持对于确保安全的灾害响应仍然至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Agromedicine
Journal of Agromedicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
20.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agromedicine: Practice, Policy, and Research publishes translational research, reports and editorials related to agricultural health, safety and medicine. The Journal of Agromedicine seeks to engage the global agricultural health and safety community including rural health care providers, agricultural health and safety practitioners, academic researchers, government agencies, policy makers, and others. The Journal of Agromedicine is committed to providing its readers with relevant, rigorously peer-reviewed, original articles. The journal welcomes high quality submissions as they relate to agricultural health and safety in the areas of: • Behavioral and Mental Health • Climate Change • Education/Training • Emerging Practices • Environmental Public Health • Epidemiology • Ergonomics • Injury Prevention • Occupational and Industrial Health • Pesticides • Policy • Safety Interventions and Evaluation • Technology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信