What does play have to do with it? A concrete and digital spatial intervention with 3-year-olds predicts spatial and math learning.

IF 3.1 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Developmental Psychology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1037/dev0001904
Corinne A Bower, Laura Zimmermann, Brian N Verdine, Tamara Spiewak Toub, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff
{"title":"What does play have to do with it? A concrete and digital spatial intervention with 3-year-olds predicts spatial and math learning.","authors":"Corinne A Bower, Laura Zimmermann, Brian N Verdine, Tamara Spiewak Toub, Kathy Hirsh-Pasek, Roberta Michnick Golinkoff","doi":"10.1037/dev0001904","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Spatial skills like block building and puzzle making are associated with later growth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning. How these early spatial experiences-both in concrete and digital platforms-boost children's spatial skills remains a mystery. This study examined how children with low- and high-parental education use corrective feedback in a series of spatial assembly tasks. We further ask whether this spatial learning increases near- and far-transfer spatial and math skills. U.S. preschoolers (<i>N</i> = 331) were randomly assigned to either a \"business-as-usual\" control or one of six spatial training groups (comprising concrete and digital training with modeling and feedback [MF], gesture feedback, or spatial language feedback). Children were trained for 5 weeks to construct 2D puzzles that match a model using a variety of geometric shapes. Pre- and posttests evaluated 2D and 3D spatial assembly, spatial language comprehension, shape identification, and math performance. Results indicate performance enhancement in trained 2D spatial assembly across all six trainings. Digital gesture feedback transferred, boosting 3D spatial assembly performance. Both concrete and digital spatial language feedback trainings increased shape identification performance. Concrete-MF significantly (and digital-MF marginally) increased word problem math performance for children with lower parental education. Finally, collapsing across conditions, both concrete and digital training increased overall spatial skills, especially for preschoolers with lower parental education. Transfer to overall mathematics performance was far less robust. Overall, early concrete and digital spatial assembly experiences seem to support preschoolers' spatial skill development but have a minor impact on mathematics skill development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":48464,"journal":{"name":"Developmental Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"461-481"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Developmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Spatial skills like block building and puzzle making are associated with later growth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning. How these early spatial experiences-both in concrete and digital platforms-boost children's spatial skills remains a mystery. This study examined how children with low- and high-parental education use corrective feedback in a series of spatial assembly tasks. We further ask whether this spatial learning increases near- and far-transfer spatial and math skills. U.S. preschoolers (N = 331) were randomly assigned to either a "business-as-usual" control or one of six spatial training groups (comprising concrete and digital training with modeling and feedback [MF], gesture feedback, or spatial language feedback). Children were trained for 5 weeks to construct 2D puzzles that match a model using a variety of geometric shapes. Pre- and posttests evaluated 2D and 3D spatial assembly, spatial language comprehension, shape identification, and math performance. Results indicate performance enhancement in trained 2D spatial assembly across all six trainings. Digital gesture feedback transferred, boosting 3D spatial assembly performance. Both concrete and digital spatial language feedback trainings increased shape identification performance. Concrete-MF significantly (and digital-MF marginally) increased word problem math performance for children with lower parental education. Finally, collapsing across conditions, both concrete and digital training increased overall spatial skills, especially for preschoolers with lower parental education. Transfer to overall mathematics performance was far less robust. Overall, early concrete and digital spatial assembly experiences seem to support preschoolers' spatial skill development but have a minor impact on mathematics skill development. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

这和玩耍有什么关系?对3岁儿童进行具体的数字空间干预可以预测他们的空间和数学学习。
空间技能,如积木和拼图,与科学、技术、工程和数学学习的后期发展有关。这些早期的空间体验——无论是在实体平台上还是在数字平台上——是如何提高孩子们的空间技能的,这仍然是一个谜。本研究考察了低父母教育和高父母教育的儿童在一系列空间组装任务中如何使用纠正反馈。我们进一步询问这种空间学习是否会提高近距离和远距离迁移的空间和数学技能。美国学龄前儿童(N = 331)被随机分配到“一切照旧”的对照组或六个空间训练组中的一个(包括具体和数字训练,建模和反馈[MF],手势反馈或空间语言反馈)。孩子们接受了5周的训练,用各种几何形状构建与模型匹配的2D拼图。前后测试评估了二维和三维空间装配、空间语言理解、形状识别和数学表现。结果表明,在所有六种训练中,训练后的二维空间装配性能都有所提高。数字手势反馈传递,提高三维空间装配性能。具体和数字空间语言反馈训练均能提高形状识别能力。对于父母受教育程度较低的儿童,Concrete-MF显著(而digital-MF略微)提高了他们的数学应用题成绩。最后,在不同的条件下,具体和数字训练都提高了整体的空间技能,特别是对于父母教育程度较低的学龄前儿童。整体数学表现的转移远没有那么强劲。总体而言,早期具体和数字空间组装经验似乎支持学龄前儿童的空间技能发展,但对数学技能发展的影响较小。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Developmental Psychology
Developmental Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.50%
发文量
329
期刊介绍: Developmental Psychology ® publishes articles that significantly advance knowledge and theory about development across the life span. The journal focuses on seminal empirical contributions. The journal occasionally publishes exceptionally strong scholarly reviews and theoretical or methodological articles. Studies of any aspect of psychological development are appropriate, as are studies of the biological, social, and cultural factors that affect development. The journal welcomes not only laboratory-based experimental studies but studies employing other rigorous methodologies, such as ethnographies, field research, and secondary analyses of large data sets. We especially seek submissions in new areas of inquiry and submissions that will address contradictory findings or controversies in the field as well as the generalizability of extant findings in new populations. Although most articles in this journal address human development, studies of other species are appropriate if they have important implications for human development. Submissions can consist of single manuscripts, proposed sections, or short reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信