Measuring psychological well-being in a danish pregnancy cohort using the self-reported WHO-5 index.

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Cecilie Holm Christiansen, Karl Bang Christensen, Stinne Høgh, Kristina M Renault, Marie Stampe Emborg, Vibe G Frokjaer, Hanne Hegaard
{"title":"Measuring psychological well-being in a danish pregnancy cohort using the self-reported WHO-5 index.","authors":"Cecilie Holm Christiansen, Karl Bang Christensen, Stinne Høgh, Kristina M Renault, Marie Stampe Emborg, Vibe G Frokjaer, Hanne Hegaard","doi":"10.1186/s40359-025-02343-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reduced well-being and depressive episodes frequently complicate pregnancy and can result in serious adverse outcomes for both mother and infant if left untreated. This study aimed to assess the psychometric validity of the 5-item World Health Organization index (WHO-5), and to evaluate if the WHO-5 index can serve as a proxy for two items of core depressive symptoms from the Major Depression Inventory (MDI), identified as MDI-2. Additionally, the paper aimed to assess well-being and detect risk factors of reduced well-being using the WHO-5 index.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using the WHO-5 index, this study analyzed the psychological well-being of a population of 37,129 women in their first trimester of pregnancy. The psychometric validity of the WHO-5 index was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Furthermore, cut-off scores of the WHO-5 index previously associated with mental distress, ≤ 50 and ≤ 28, were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative predictive values compared to the MDI-2 in a subsample of n = 1001 women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Lower mean score on the WHO-5 index was seen among pregnant women ≤ 25 years old, with lower educational level, who were unemployed, nulliparous, did not understand Danish language, were not cohabitating, were smokers, and women who did not exercise prior to pregnancy. The WHO-5 index was found to be a valid psychometric instrument, however, scores could not be pooled or compared across women who understood Danish and women who did not understand Danish. The sensitivity and specificity of cut-off score of ≤ 50 on the WHO-5 index with a for predicting the presence of one core symptom from the MDI-2 was 0.81 and 0.82, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity using a cut-off of ≤ 28 was 0.32 and 0.98, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The WHO-5 index had high degree of acceptability and identified well-known risk factors of mental distress in a pregnant population. The WHO-5 index was found to be a valid psychometric instrument in pregnancy, however, our analysis indicated low predictive value of the investigated cut-off scores on the WHO-5 index in identification of MDI-2 core symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"13 1","pages":"41"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737152/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-025-02343-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Reduced well-being and depressive episodes frequently complicate pregnancy and can result in serious adverse outcomes for both mother and infant if left untreated. This study aimed to assess the psychometric validity of the 5-item World Health Organization index (WHO-5), and to evaluate if the WHO-5 index can serve as a proxy for two items of core depressive symptoms from the Major Depression Inventory (MDI), identified as MDI-2. Additionally, the paper aimed to assess well-being and detect risk factors of reduced well-being using the WHO-5 index.

Methods: Using the WHO-5 index, this study analyzed the psychological well-being of a population of 37,129 women in their first trimester of pregnancy. The psychometric validity of the WHO-5 index was evaluated using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Furthermore, cut-off scores of the WHO-5 index previously associated with mental distress, ≤ 50 and ≤ 28, were evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive- and negative predictive values compared to the MDI-2 in a subsample of n = 1001 women.

Results: Lower mean score on the WHO-5 index was seen among pregnant women ≤ 25 years old, with lower educational level, who were unemployed, nulliparous, did not understand Danish language, were not cohabitating, were smokers, and women who did not exercise prior to pregnancy. The WHO-5 index was found to be a valid psychometric instrument, however, scores could not be pooled or compared across women who understood Danish and women who did not understand Danish. The sensitivity and specificity of cut-off score of ≤ 50 on the WHO-5 index with a for predicting the presence of one core symptom from the MDI-2 was 0.81 and 0.82, respectively, while the sensitivity and specificity using a cut-off of ≤ 28 was 0.32 and 0.98, respectively.

Conclusions: The WHO-5 index had high degree of acceptability and identified well-known risk factors of mental distress in a pregnant population. The WHO-5 index was found to be a valid psychometric instrument in pregnancy, however, our analysis indicated low predictive value of the investigated cut-off scores on the WHO-5 index in identification of MDI-2 core symptoms.

使用自我报告的WHO-5指数测量丹麦怀孕队列的心理健康状况。
背景:幸福感下降和抑郁发作经常使妊娠复杂化,如果不及时治疗,可能导致母亲和婴儿的严重不良后果。本研究旨在评估5项世界卫生组织指数(WHO-5)的心理测量效度,并评估WHO-5指数是否可以作为重度抑郁量表(MDI)中两项核心抑郁症状(MDI -2)的代理。此外,本文旨在利用世卫组织5指数评估幸福感并检测幸福感降低的风险因素。方法:使用WHO-5指数,本研究分析了37129名怀孕前三个月妇女的心理健康状况。采用验证性因子分析和项目反应理论评估WHO-5指数的心理测量效度。此外,在n = 1001名妇女的子样本中,对先前与精神痛苦相关的WHO-5指数的临界值≤50和≤28进行了敏感性、特异性以及与MDI-2相比的阳性和阴性预测值的评估。结果:年龄≤25岁、受教育程度较低、无业、未生育、不懂丹麦语、未同居、吸烟和孕前未运动的孕妇的who -5指数平均得分较低。世卫组织5指数被发现是一种有效的心理测量工具,然而,分数不能汇总或比较懂丹麦语和不懂丹麦语的妇女。当截断值≤50时,WHO-5指数与a预测MDI-2是否存在一种核心症状的敏感性和特异性分别为0.81和0.82,而截断值≤28时,敏感性和特异性分别为0.32和0.98。结论:WHO-5指数具有较高的可接受度,并能识别出妊娠人群中已知的精神困扰危险因素。我们发现WHO-5指数是妊娠期有效的心理测量工具,然而,我们的分析表明,所调查的WHO-5指数的截止分数在识别MDI-2核心症状方面的预测价值较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信