{"title":"2024 Scholars' Research Symposium Abstract: Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) to Master Airway Intubation.","authors":"Kirsten R Kim Sawtelle","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Simulation has become an integral part of health care education curricula that is used to teach a variety of topics, from emergency situations to physical diagnoses. Without further reinforcement, the skills learned through the simulation are subject to deterioration over time. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) is a teaching method that was developed to resist this deterioration and achieve mastery of skills. In RCDP, learners cycle through a series of high-intensity and fast-paced scenarios until performance mastery was achieved. The individualized feedback is optimized with a 2:1 learner: instructor ratio. The goal of RCDP is to ensure 100% competency and time-efficiency of learners' performances. This study examined two sub-types of RCDP-style teaching to determine retention after 6-months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-day airway management course was conducted using RCDP to teach endotracheal intubation to second-year medical students using Medical Students as Simulations Educators (MSASE) as instructors. On Day 1, learners participated in 40-minute training sessions using a 2:1 ratio of learners to educators to practice intravenous induction into anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Half the groups used an immediate-feedback (IF) RCDP approach while the other half used a delayed-feedback (DF) RCDP approach. Day 2 was completed 1 week later using similar methods. Learners participated in a 1-day simulation course in 6 months to assess retention (Day 3).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On Day 1, the IF group achieved mastery in fewer trials compared to the DF group (p = 0.004). The DF group required an average of 1.14 (CI = 0.845 - 1.433) trials until mastery, while the IF group required 0.516 (CI = 0.226 - 0.806) trials. The IF and DF groups demonstrated 98% knowledge and skills proficiency on Day 3, which is a significant increase from Day 1 and Day 2 scores of 92% and 88%, respectively. There was no significant difference in retention between the IF and DF groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RCDP is an effective teaching method to achieve mastery with performing endotracheal intubation to second-year medical students. There was no significant difference between immediate-feedback and delayed-feedback when retention of this clinical skill was reassessed at 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":39219,"journal":{"name":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","volume":"77 9","pages":"408"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South Dakota medicine : the journal of the South Dakota State Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Simulation has become an integral part of health care education curricula that is used to teach a variety of topics, from emergency situations to physical diagnoses. Without further reinforcement, the skills learned through the simulation are subject to deterioration over time. Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice (RCDP) is a teaching method that was developed to resist this deterioration and achieve mastery of skills. In RCDP, learners cycle through a series of high-intensity and fast-paced scenarios until performance mastery was achieved. The individualized feedback is optimized with a 2:1 learner: instructor ratio. The goal of RCDP is to ensure 100% competency and time-efficiency of learners' performances. This study examined two sub-types of RCDP-style teaching to determine retention after 6-months.
Methods: A two-day airway management course was conducted using RCDP to teach endotracheal intubation to second-year medical students using Medical Students as Simulations Educators (MSASE) as instructors. On Day 1, learners participated in 40-minute training sessions using a 2:1 ratio of learners to educators to practice intravenous induction into anesthesia and endotracheal intubation. Half the groups used an immediate-feedback (IF) RCDP approach while the other half used a delayed-feedback (DF) RCDP approach. Day 2 was completed 1 week later using similar methods. Learners participated in a 1-day simulation course in 6 months to assess retention (Day 3).
Results: On Day 1, the IF group achieved mastery in fewer trials compared to the DF group (p = 0.004). The DF group required an average of 1.14 (CI = 0.845 - 1.433) trials until mastery, while the IF group required 0.516 (CI = 0.226 - 0.806) trials. The IF and DF groups demonstrated 98% knowledge and skills proficiency on Day 3, which is a significant increase from Day 1 and Day 2 scores of 92% and 88%, respectively. There was no significant difference in retention between the IF and DF groups.
Conclusions: RCDP is an effective teaching method to achieve mastery with performing endotracheal intubation to second-year medical students. There was no significant difference between immediate-feedback and delayed-feedback when retention of this clinical skill was reassessed at 6 months.