David C. Hein MD , Ajay K. Srivastava MD , Seann E. Willson MD , Paul M. Telehowski MD , Patrick J. Atkinson PhD , Theresa S. Atkinson PhD
{"title":"Does a Provider Contact Wristband Reduce Emergency Department Visit Rates Following Hip or Knee Arthroplasty?","authors":"David C. Hein MD , Ajay K. Srivastava MD , Seann E. Willson MD , Paul M. Telehowski MD , Patrick J. Atkinson PhD , Theresa S. Atkinson PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.artd.2024.101599","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Reducing unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits following joint arthroplasty is an important goal. Literature suggests 30-day visit rates range between 4% and 15%, with only 20%-25% of these admitted for care. Low admissions suggest an opportunity to reduce unnecessary postarthroplasty ED visits. This study examined whether a wristband would encourage patients to call the care team with concerns prior to going to the ED.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A wristband displaying a contact phone number was placed on patients at discharge. ED visit rates (30 and 90 days) and readmissions (90 days) were tabulated for 2 years prior to and up to 3 years after the implementation of the wristband program. Residents who responded to calls and call logs were also reviewed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>At 2 years after implementation, a total of 1023 joint replacements produced 273 calls or 1 call per 3.75 patients. Nearly half (48.1%) of the calls were received during weekday work hours when the patients had been directed to call the office. While ED visits declined after the implementation of the wristband at both 2 and 3 years, these reductions were not statistically significant (30 days: 5.1% before, 4.1% after; 90 days: 8.1% before, 7.1% after). There was a significant reduction in 90-day readmissions (6.4% before, 4.0% after).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients utilized the wristband number, but this did not significantly reduce the number of ED visits within 3 years. Future studies should track ED visits and identify decision-making factors behind ED use in order to find ways to improve the intervention.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37940,"journal":{"name":"Arthroplasty Today","volume":"31 ","pages":"Article 101599"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11743857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroplasty Today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235234412400284X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Reducing unnecessary emergency department (ED) visits following joint arthroplasty is an important goal. Literature suggests 30-day visit rates range between 4% and 15%, with only 20%-25% of these admitted for care. Low admissions suggest an opportunity to reduce unnecessary postarthroplasty ED visits. This study examined whether a wristband would encourage patients to call the care team with concerns prior to going to the ED.
Methods
A wristband displaying a contact phone number was placed on patients at discharge. ED visit rates (30 and 90 days) and readmissions (90 days) were tabulated for 2 years prior to and up to 3 years after the implementation of the wristband program. Residents who responded to calls and call logs were also reviewed.
Results
At 2 years after implementation, a total of 1023 joint replacements produced 273 calls or 1 call per 3.75 patients. Nearly half (48.1%) of the calls were received during weekday work hours when the patients had been directed to call the office. While ED visits declined after the implementation of the wristband at both 2 and 3 years, these reductions were not statistically significant (30 days: 5.1% before, 4.1% after; 90 days: 8.1% before, 7.1% after). There was a significant reduction in 90-day readmissions (6.4% before, 4.0% after).
Conclusions
Patients utilized the wristband number, but this did not significantly reduce the number of ED visits within 3 years. Future studies should track ED visits and identify decision-making factors behind ED use in order to find ways to improve the intervention.
期刊介绍:
Arthroplasty Today is a companion journal to the Journal of Arthroplasty. The journal Arthroplasty Today brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement of the hip and knee in an open-access, online format. Arthroplasty Today solicits manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas of scientific endeavor that relate to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with patient outcomes, economic and policy issues, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, and biologic response to arthroplasty. The journal focuses on case reports. It is the purpose of Arthroplasty Today to present material to practicing orthopaedic surgeons that will keep them abreast of developments in the field, prove useful in the care of patients, and aid in understanding the scientific foundation of this subspecialty area of joint replacement. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal''s area of interest. Their participation ensures that each issue of Arthroplasty Today provides the reader with timely, peer-reviewed articles of the highest quality.