What Kinds of Computations Can Young Children Perform Over Non-Symbolic Representations of Small Quantities?

Q1 Social Sciences
Open Mind Pub Date : 2025-01-04 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1162/opmi_a_00177
Chen Cheng, Melissa M Kibbe
{"title":"What Kinds of Computations Can Young Children Perform Over Non-Symbolic Representations of Small Quantities?","authors":"Chen Cheng, Melissa M Kibbe","doi":"10.1162/opmi_a_00177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children can manipulate non-symbolic representations of both small quantities of objects (about four or fewer, represented by the parallel individuation system) and large quantities of objects (represented by the analog magnitude system, or AMS). Previous work has shown that children can perform a variety of non-symbolic operations over AMS representations (like summing and solving for an unknown addend), but are not able to perform further operations on the derived solutions of such non-symbolic operations. However, while the computational capacity of AMS has been studied extensively in early childhood, less is known about the computational capacity of the parallel individuation system. In two experiments, we examined children's ability to perform two types of arithmetic-like operations over representations of small, exact quantities, and whether they could subsequently perform novel operations on derived quantity representations. Four-6-year-old US children (<i>n</i> = 99) solved two types of non-symbolic arithmetic-like problems with small quantities: summation and unknown addend problems. We then tested whether children could use the solutions to these problems as inputs to new operations. Results showed that children more readily solved non-symbolic small, exact addition problems compared to unknown addend problems. However, when children did successfully solve either kind of problem, they were able to use those derived solutions to solve a novel non-symbolic small, exact problem. These results suggest that the parallel individuation system is computationally flexible, contrasting with previous work showing that the AMS is more computationally limited, and shed light on the computational capacities and limitations of representing and operating over representations of small quantities of individual objects.</p>","PeriodicalId":32558,"journal":{"name":"Open Mind","volume":"9 ","pages":"25-46"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11729788/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Mind","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/opmi_a_00177","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children can manipulate non-symbolic representations of both small quantities of objects (about four or fewer, represented by the parallel individuation system) and large quantities of objects (represented by the analog magnitude system, or AMS). Previous work has shown that children can perform a variety of non-symbolic operations over AMS representations (like summing and solving for an unknown addend), but are not able to perform further operations on the derived solutions of such non-symbolic operations. However, while the computational capacity of AMS has been studied extensively in early childhood, less is known about the computational capacity of the parallel individuation system. In two experiments, we examined children's ability to perform two types of arithmetic-like operations over representations of small, exact quantities, and whether they could subsequently perform novel operations on derived quantity representations. Four-6-year-old US children (n = 99) solved two types of non-symbolic arithmetic-like problems with small quantities: summation and unknown addend problems. We then tested whether children could use the solutions to these problems as inputs to new operations. Results showed that children more readily solved non-symbolic small, exact addition problems compared to unknown addend problems. However, when children did successfully solve either kind of problem, they were able to use those derived solutions to solve a novel non-symbolic small, exact problem. These results suggest that the parallel individuation system is computationally flexible, contrasting with previous work showing that the AMS is more computationally limited, and shed light on the computational capacities and limitations of representing and operating over representations of small quantities of individual objects.

幼儿对小量的非符号表示能进行哪些计算?
儿童可以操作小数量对象(大约四个或更少,由并行个性化系统表示)和大量对象(由模拟数量级系统或AMS表示)的非符号表示。以前的工作表明,儿童可以对AMS表示执行各种非符号操作(如求和和求解未知加数),但不能对此类非符号操作的派生解执行进一步的操作。然而,虽然AMS的计算能力在儿童早期得到了广泛的研究,但对并行个性化系统的计算能力知之甚少。在两个实验中,我们考察了儿童对小而精确的数量表示进行两种类似算术运算的能力,以及他们随后是否能够对派生的数量表示进行新的运算。4 -6岁的美国儿童(n = 99)解决了两类小数量的非符号算术问题:求和和未知加数问题。然后,我们测试了孩子们是否可以将这些问题的解决方案作为新操作的输入。结果表明,与未知加法问题相比,儿童更容易解决非符号小的精确加法问题。然而,当孩子们成功地解决了任何一种问题时,他们能够使用这些推导出的解决方案来解决一个新的、非象征性的、小的、精确的问题。这些结果表明,并行个性化系统在计算上是灵活的,而之前的研究表明,AMS在计算上有更多的限制,并揭示了对少量单个对象的表示和操作的计算能力和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Mind
Open Mind Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信