Transfusion efficacy of leucoreduced packed red blood cells prepared by two different methods: A randomized controlled trial in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients (FUEL trial).

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Vox Sanguinis Pub Date : 2025-01-16 DOI:10.1111/vox.13797
Adhikarimayum Arunkumari, Ashish Jain, Sheetal Malhotra, Hari Krishan Dhawan, Srinivasan Peyam, Sangeeta Kumari, Ratti Ram Sharma
{"title":"Transfusion efficacy of leucoreduced packed red blood cells prepared by two different methods: A randomized controlled trial in transfusion-dependent thalassaemia patients (FUEL trial).","authors":"Adhikarimayum Arunkumari, Ashish Jain, Sheetal Malhotra, Hari Krishan Dhawan, Srinivasan Peyam, Sangeeta Kumari, Ratti Ram Sharma","doi":"10.1111/vox.13797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Great variations may be observed in the haemoglobin (Hb) content of packed red blood cell (PRBC) units prepared by different methods. This study aimed to assess the Hb increment in thalassaemia major patients transfused with leucoreduced PRBCs (LPRBCs) prepared by two different methods: (i) standard leucoreduced PRBCs (SLPRBCs) and (ii) leucoreduced PRBCs prepared by a new method where leucoreduction of whole blood is done first (NLPRBCs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 80 adult thalassaemia major patients who were randomized into two groups of 40 each. Group I patients received SLPRBC and those of Group II received NLPRBC transfusions for 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SLPRBCs had a mean (±SD) volume of 275.50 ± 17.07 mL, while it was 316.46 ± 1.42 mL for NLPRBCs (p < 0.001). The mean Hb content of SLPRBCs was 50.60 ± 5.12 g, while that of NLPRBCs was 56.98 ± 5.92 g (p < 0.001). The mean Hb increment in Group I patients was 2.11 ± 0.89 g/dL, while that of Group II patients was 2.48 ± 0.88 g/dL (p < 0.001). The mean transfusion interval for Group I patients was 20.30 ± 3.75 days, while it was 21.34 ± 5.13 days for Group II patients (p < 0.045). A significant positive correlation was observed between the Hb dose transfused and the Hb increment with both SLPRBC (ρ = 0.4, p < 0.001) and NLPRBC (ρ = 0.19, p = 0.011) transfusions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>NLPRBCs had significantly higher Hb content than the SLPRBCs, leading to a better Hb increment post transfusion, which may potentially prolong the transfusion interval in thalassaemia major patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23631,"journal":{"name":"Vox Sanguinis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox Sanguinis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.13797","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Great variations may be observed in the haemoglobin (Hb) content of packed red blood cell (PRBC) units prepared by different methods. This study aimed to assess the Hb increment in thalassaemia major patients transfused with leucoreduced PRBCs (LPRBCs) prepared by two different methods: (i) standard leucoreduced PRBCs (SLPRBCs) and (ii) leucoreduced PRBCs prepared by a new method where leucoreduction of whole blood is done first (NLPRBCs).

Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 80 adult thalassaemia major patients who were randomized into two groups of 40 each. Group I patients received SLPRBC and those of Group II received NLPRBC transfusions for 3 months.

Results: SLPRBCs had a mean (±SD) volume of 275.50 ± 17.07 mL, while it was 316.46 ± 1.42 mL for NLPRBCs (p < 0.001). The mean Hb content of SLPRBCs was 50.60 ± 5.12 g, while that of NLPRBCs was 56.98 ± 5.92 g (p < 0.001). The mean Hb increment in Group I patients was 2.11 ± 0.89 g/dL, while that of Group II patients was 2.48 ± 0.88 g/dL (p < 0.001). The mean transfusion interval for Group I patients was 20.30 ± 3.75 days, while it was 21.34 ± 5.13 days for Group II patients (p < 0.045). A significant positive correlation was observed between the Hb dose transfused and the Hb increment with both SLPRBC (ρ = 0.4, p < 0.001) and NLPRBC (ρ = 0.19, p = 0.011) transfusions.

Conclusion: NLPRBCs had significantly higher Hb content than the SLPRBCs, leading to a better Hb increment post transfusion, which may potentially prolong the transfusion interval in thalassaemia major patients.

两种不同方法制备的低白细胞填充红细胞的输血疗效:一项输血依赖性地中海贫血患者的随机对照试验(FUEL试验)。
背景和目的:不同方法制备的填充红细胞(PRBC)单位的血红蛋白(Hb)含量可能存在很大差异。本研究旨在评估地中海贫血重症患者输注经两种不同方法制备的降白细胞(lprbc)后的Hb增加情况:(i)标准降白细胞(slprbc)和(ii)先进行全血降白细胞的新方法制备的降白细胞(nlprbc)。材料与方法:本前瞻性、随机、对照试验纳入80例成年地中海贫血重症患者,随机分为两组,每组40例。第一组患者接受SLPRBC输注,第二组患者接受NLPRBC输注,输注时间为3个月。结果:slprbc的平均(±SD)体积为275.50±17.07 mL, nlprbc的平均(±SD)体积为316.46±1.42 mL (p)结论:nlprbc的Hb含量明显高于slprbc,导致输血后Hb增量更好,可能延长地中海贫血重症患者的输血间隔时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vox Sanguinis
Vox Sanguinis 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.10%
发文量
156
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Vox Sanguinis reports on important, novel developments in transfusion medicine. Original papers, reviews and international fora are published on all aspects of blood transfusion and tissue transplantation, comprising five main sections: 1) Transfusion - Transmitted Disease and its Prevention: Identification and epidemiology of infectious agents transmissible by blood; Bacterial contamination of blood components; Donor recruitment and selection methods; Pathogen inactivation. 2) Blood Component Collection and Production: Blood collection methods and devices (including apheresis); Plasma fractionation techniques and plasma derivatives; Preparation of labile blood components; Inventory management; Hematopoietic progenitor cell collection and storage; Collection and storage of tissues; Quality management and good manufacturing practice; Automation and information technology. 3) Transfusion Medicine and New Therapies: Transfusion thresholds and audits; Haemovigilance; Clinical trials regarding appropriate haemotherapy; Non-infectious adverse affects of transfusion; Therapeutic apheresis; Support of transplant patients; Gene therapy and immunotherapy. 4) Immunohaematology and Immunogenetics: Autoimmunity in haematology; Alloimmunity of blood; Pre-transfusion testing; Immunodiagnostics; Immunobiology; Complement in immunohaematology; Blood typing reagents; Genetic markers of blood cells and serum proteins: polymorphisms and function; Genetic markers and disease; Parentage testing and forensic immunohaematology. 5) Cellular Therapy: Cell-based therapies; Stem cell sources; Stem cell processing and storage; Stem cell products; Stem cell plasticity; Regenerative medicine with cells; Cellular immunotherapy; Molecular therapy; Gene therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信