Machine Learning-based Cluster Analysis Identifies Three Unique Phenotypes of Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity With Distinct Clinical Profiles and Long-term Recovery Trajectory: A Development Study.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI:10.1097/BRS.0000000000005267
Peng Cui, Peng Wang, Shuaikang Wang, Di Han, Qingyang Huang, Wei Wang, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu
{"title":"Machine Learning-based Cluster Analysis Identifies Three Unique Phenotypes of Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity With Distinct Clinical Profiles and Long-term Recovery Trajectory: A Development Study.","authors":"Peng Cui, Peng Wang, Shuaikang Wang, Di Han, Qingyang Huang, Wei Wang, Xiaolong Chen, Shibao Lu","doi":"10.1097/BRS.0000000000005267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective review of a prospective adult spinal deformity data.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify distinct patient clinical profiles and recovery trajectories in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Patients with ASD exhibit a diverse array of symptoms and significant heterogeneity in clinical presentations, posing challenges to precise clinical decision-making. Accurate patient selection may provide further insight to personalized management strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to determine possible patient phenotype. Goodness-of-fit indices were used to determine the optimal cluster profiles. Outcome differences were evaluated using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and subsequent post hoc Tukey's test, while significant predictors of group membership were identified through multinomial logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 204 ASD patients (mean age of 60.3 ± 11.8 years, comprising 62.3% females) with complete 1-year and 2-year follow-up outcome were included. LPA identified three phenotypes: 51 patients in phenotype 1, 73 patients in phenotype 2 and 80 patients in phenotype 3, respectively. Each phenotype exhibited a unique symptom profile and distinct functional recovery trajectories. Patients in phenotype 3, although demonstrated the worst Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22r) domains at baseline, patients in this cluster exhibited the most substantial Δchange in SRS-22r domains except for self-image at both 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Remarkably, a relative large proportion of patients (58.8%) who were dissatisfied at 1-year follow-up transited to satisfied at 2-year follow-up. Advanced age, longer symptom duration, severe preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, higher preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), fusion extending to sacrum/pelvis and grade ≥ 3 osteotomy predicted membership in the phenotype 3.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LPA enabled the delineation of three distinct phenotypes among ASD patients, each characterized by unique clinical profiles and distinct long-term recovery trajectories. By pinpointing the crucial variables that uniquely distinguish and predict membership in different phenotypes, the study provides valuable guidance for patient stratification.</p>","PeriodicalId":22193,"journal":{"name":"Spine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: A retrospective review of a prospective adult spinal deformity data.

Objective: To identify distinct patient clinical profiles and recovery trajectories in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD).

Summary of background data: Patients with ASD exhibit a diverse array of symptoms and significant heterogeneity in clinical presentations, posing challenges to precise clinical decision-making. Accurate patient selection may provide further insight to personalized management strategies.

Methods: Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to determine possible patient phenotype. Goodness-of-fit indices were used to determine the optimal cluster profiles. Outcome differences were evaluated using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) and subsequent post hoc Tukey's test, while significant predictors of group membership were identified through multinomial logistic regression.

Results: A total of 204 ASD patients (mean age of 60.3 ± 11.8 years, comprising 62.3% females) with complete 1-year and 2-year follow-up outcome were included. LPA identified three phenotypes: 51 patients in phenotype 1, 73 patients in phenotype 2 and 80 patients in phenotype 3, respectively. Each phenotype exhibited a unique symptom profile and distinct functional recovery trajectories. Patients in phenotype 3, although demonstrated the worst Scoliosis Research Society-22 questionnaire (SRS-22r) domains at baseline, patients in this cluster exhibited the most substantial Δchange in SRS-22r domains except for self-image at both 1-year and 2-year follow-up. Remarkably, a relative large proportion of patients (58.8%) who were dissatisfied at 1-year follow-up transited to satisfied at 2-year follow-up. Advanced age, longer symptom duration, severe preoperative pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) mismatch, higher preoperative sagittal vertical axis (SVA), fusion extending to sacrum/pelvis and grade ≥ 3 osteotomy predicted membership in the phenotype 3.

Conclusions: LPA enabled the delineation of three distinct phenotypes among ASD patients, each characterized by unique clinical profiles and distinct long-term recovery trajectories. By pinpointing the crucial variables that uniquely distinguish and predict membership in different phenotypes, the study provides valuable guidance for patient stratification.

基于机器学习的聚类分析确定了具有不同临床特征和长期恢复轨迹的成人脊柱畸形患者的三种独特表型:一项发展研究。
研究设计:对前瞻性成人脊柱畸形资料进行回顾性分析。目的:明确成人脊柱畸形(ASD)患者的临床特征和康复轨迹。背景资料总结:ASD患者表现出多样化的症状和临床表现的显著异质性,对精确的临床决策提出了挑战。准确的患者选择可以为个性化管理策略提供进一步的见解。方法:采用潜在谱分析(LPA)确定可能的患者表型。采用拟合优度指标确定最优聚类曲线。使用方差分析(ANOVA)和随后的事后Tukey检验来评估结果差异,而通过多项逻辑回归来确定群体成员的显著预测因子。结果:共纳入204例ASD患者(平均年龄60.3±11.8岁,其中女性62.3%),随访1年和2年。LPA鉴定出三种表型:表型1 51例,表型2 73例,表型3 80例。每种表型都表现出独特的症状特征和不同的功能恢复轨迹。表型3的患者,虽然在基线时表现出最差的脊柱侧凸研究协会-22问卷(SRS-22r)域,但在1年和2年的随访中,除了自我形象外,该组患者在SRS-22r域中表现出最丰富的Δchange。值得注意的是,相对较大比例(58.8%)的患者在1年随访时不满意,在2年随访时转为满意。高龄、较长的症状持续时间、严重的术前骨盆发生率-腰椎前凸(PI-LL)不匹配、较高的术前矢状垂直轴(SVA)、融合延伸至骶骨/骨盆和≥3级截骨预测表型3的成员。结论:LPA能够在ASD患者中描述三种不同的表型,每种表型都具有独特的临床特征和不同的长期恢复轨迹。通过精确地指出区分和预测不同表型成员的关键变量,该研究为患者分层提供了有价值的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Spine
Spine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
361
审稿时长
6.0 months
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Recognized internationally as the leading journal in its field, Spine is an international, peer-reviewed, bi-weekly periodical that considers for publication original articles in the field of Spine. It is the leading subspecialty journal for the treatment of spinal disorders. Only original papers are considered for publication with the understanding that they are contributed solely to Spine. The Journal does not publish articles reporting material that has been reported at length elsewhere.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信