Investigating the Multidomain Impact of Palliative Care on End-of-Life Patients: A Comprehensive Evaluation.

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2025-01-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tswj/4203906
Mohammad O Abu Hasheesh
{"title":"Investigating the Multidomain Impact of Palliative Care on End-of-Life Patients: A Comprehensive Evaluation.","authors":"Mohammad O Abu Hasheesh","doi":"10.1155/tswj/4203906","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Palliative care is recognized for its holistic approach in improving the quality of life for patients and their families, focusing on pain relief, symptom management, and addressing emotional, social, and spiritual needs. However, the field is evolving due to increasing demand for these specialized services, emphasizing the need for the ongoing research into palliative care practices. <b>Research Purpose:</b> Is to investigate the multidomain impact of palliative care on end-of-life patients and evaluate their effectiveness on these domains. <b>Method:</b> A quantitative descriptive design was adopted for conducting the current study. Approval obtained from a designated hospital in Amman, Jordan, and official permission to carry out the study. The study's participants consisted primarily of physicians and nurses who were involved in providing care to terminally ill patients. The research tool employed in this study is a standardized palliative care assessment that was used in Australia, with modifications based on the literature review. The validity and reliability of the adapted tool have been ensured through rigorous testing procedures. <b>Results:</b> Findings indicated that the implementation of standardized practical palliative care exhibited an average level across all domains, specifically, the spiritual domain received the highest mean score (1.80), while the structural domain had the lowest (1.69). There were significant differences in palliative care provision across specialized work sites, with radiotherapy and blood disease sites scoring higher (<i>M</i> = 2.04 and <i>M</i> = 1.87, respectively). Educational levels significantly influenced care perceptions, favoring BSc holders. Age did not significantly affect palliative care provision, probably because of standardized care protocols and sample size. In addition, nurses rated palliative care higher than physicians, likely due to their more direct patient involvement. <b>Conclusion:</b> In light of the results, it is evident that there is a pressing need to consistently evaluate the healthcare services offered to meet the needs of the increasing population of terminally ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"4203906"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745550/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/4203906","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Palliative care is recognized for its holistic approach in improving the quality of life for patients and their families, focusing on pain relief, symptom management, and addressing emotional, social, and spiritual needs. However, the field is evolving due to increasing demand for these specialized services, emphasizing the need for the ongoing research into palliative care practices. Research Purpose: Is to investigate the multidomain impact of palliative care on end-of-life patients and evaluate their effectiveness on these domains. Method: A quantitative descriptive design was adopted for conducting the current study. Approval obtained from a designated hospital in Amman, Jordan, and official permission to carry out the study. The study's participants consisted primarily of physicians and nurses who were involved in providing care to terminally ill patients. The research tool employed in this study is a standardized palliative care assessment that was used in Australia, with modifications based on the literature review. The validity and reliability of the adapted tool have been ensured through rigorous testing procedures. Results: Findings indicated that the implementation of standardized practical palliative care exhibited an average level across all domains, specifically, the spiritual domain received the highest mean score (1.80), while the structural domain had the lowest (1.69). There were significant differences in palliative care provision across specialized work sites, with radiotherapy and blood disease sites scoring higher (M = 2.04 and M = 1.87, respectively). Educational levels significantly influenced care perceptions, favoring BSc holders. Age did not significantly affect palliative care provision, probably because of standardized care protocols and sample size. In addition, nurses rated palliative care higher than physicians, likely due to their more direct patient involvement. Conclusion: In light of the results, it is evident that there is a pressing need to consistently evaluate the healthcare services offered to meet the needs of the increasing population of terminally ill patients.

调查临终病人姑息治疗的多领域影响:一项综合评估。
背景:姑息治疗因其改善患者及其家属生活质量的整体方法而得到认可,其重点是缓解疼痛,症状管理,并解决情感,社会和精神需求。然而,由于对这些专业服务的需求不断增加,该领域正在发展,强调需要对姑息治疗实践进行持续研究。研究目的:探讨姑息治疗对临终病人多领域的影响,并评估其在这些领域的有效性。方法:采用定量描述设计进行本研究。获得约旦安曼一家指定医院的批准,并获得开展这项研究的正式许可。这项研究的参与者主要是为临终病人提供护理的医生和护士。本研究使用的研究工具是澳大利亚使用的标准化姑息治疗评估,并根据文献综述进行了修改。通过严格的测试程序,确保了适应工具的有效性和可靠性。结果:调查结果表明,各领域标准化实践姑息治疗的实施水平均为平均水平,其中精神领域的平均得分最高(1.80分),而结构领域的平均得分最低(1.69分)。不同专业工作场所在姑息治疗方面存在显著差异,放疗和血液病工作场所得分较高(M = 2.04和M = 1.87)。教育程度显著影响护理观念,有利于理学士。年龄对姑息治疗的提供没有显著影响,可能是因为标准化的治疗方案和样本量。此外,护士对姑息治疗的评价高于医生,可能是因为他们更直接地参与病人。结论:根据结果,显然迫切需要对所提供的医疗保健服务进行持续评估,以满足日益增长的临终病人群体的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信