#natural, #vegan, #healing: A Content Analysis of Health Content Among Instagram Posts Focused on Cannabis Edibles.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Kathryn Heley, Linnea Laestadius, Emma E McGinty, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Johannes Thrul, Danielle M Edwards, Colleen L Barry, Katherine Clegg Smith
{"title":"#natural, #vegan, #healing: A Content Analysis of Health Content Among Instagram Posts Focused on Cannabis Edibles.","authors":"Kathryn Heley, Linnea Laestadius, Emma E McGinty, Meghan Bridgid Moran, Johannes Thrul, Danielle M Edwards, Colleen L Barry, Katherine Clegg Smith","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2024.2422987","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite limited scientific evidence, public perceptions of cannabis as health enhancing are significant. As food products, cannabis edibles (edibles), may also leverage food-related associations that convey health. Social media is a prominent and influential source of largely unregulated cannabis information and a potential place to correct misinformation. Given its potential to shape product appeal and perceptions of health benefits and risks, understanding the social media landscape around edibles and health is a priority.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a quantitative content analysis of a random sample of #edibles Instagram posts (N = 702) published in January 2020. A structured coding instrument analyzed posts for: (1) non-food related health, medicine, and wellness content (2) food-related characteristics/associations suggesting edibles are healthy foods or appropriate for particular diets.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of posts (61%) featured non-food related health, medicine, or wellness content. 35% of posts noted a general health or wellness issue or benefit, while 9% highlighted a medical condition, clinical diagnosis or attendant benefit; a wide range of wellness, health, and clinical issues were cited. Nearly half of all posts (45%) alluded to medicine or being medicated, while 22% referenced medical marijuana specifically. Connections to health were also made through food-related associations, with 13% of posts citing a dietary need or nutrient claim and 10% highlighting food-related characteristics that imply product healthfulness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Health-related content is widespread among #edibles Instagram posts. Communication approaches to counter unsubstantiated health claims and regulatory strategies limiting commercial promotion should be considered. Explicit connections between edibles and health and more implicit associations via hashtags and images warrant particular attention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2024.2422987","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite limited scientific evidence, public perceptions of cannabis as health enhancing are significant. As food products, cannabis edibles (edibles), may also leverage food-related associations that convey health. Social media is a prominent and influential source of largely unregulated cannabis information and a potential place to correct misinformation. Given its potential to shape product appeal and perceptions of health benefits and risks, understanding the social media landscape around edibles and health is a priority.

Methods: We conducted a quantitative content analysis of a random sample of #edibles Instagram posts (N = 702) published in January 2020. A structured coding instrument analyzed posts for: (1) non-food related health, medicine, and wellness content (2) food-related characteristics/associations suggesting edibles are healthy foods or appropriate for particular diets.

Results: The majority of posts (61%) featured non-food related health, medicine, or wellness content. 35% of posts noted a general health or wellness issue or benefit, while 9% highlighted a medical condition, clinical diagnosis or attendant benefit; a wide range of wellness, health, and clinical issues were cited. Nearly half of all posts (45%) alluded to medicine or being medicated, while 22% referenced medical marijuana specifically. Connections to health were also made through food-related associations, with 13% of posts citing a dietary need or nutrient claim and 10% highlighting food-related characteristics that imply product healthfulness.

Conclusions: Health-related content is widespread among #edibles Instagram posts. Communication approaches to counter unsubstantiated health claims and regulatory strategies limiting commercial promotion should be considered. Explicit connections between edibles and health and more implicit associations via hashtags and images warrant particular attention.

#天然,#素食,#愈合:对Instagram上关于大麻食品的健康内容的内容分析。
背景:尽管科学证据有限,但公众对大麻增进健康的看法是重要的。作为食品,大麻可食用物(可食用物)也可以利用与食物有关的、传达健康的联想。社交媒体是主要不受管制的大麻信息的重要和有影响力的来源,也是纠正错误信息的潜在场所。鉴于它有可能塑造产品吸引力和对健康益处和风险的看法,了解围绕食品和健康的社交媒体格局是一个优先事项。方法:我们对2020年1月发布的#edibles Instagram帖子(N = 702)随机抽样进行了定量内容分析。结构化编码工具分析了以下方面的帖子:(1)与食品无关的健康、医药和保健内容(2)与食品相关的特征/关联,表明食品是健康食品或适合特定饮食。结果:大多数帖子(61%)都是非食品相关的健康、医药或保健内容。35%的帖子提到了一般的健康或保健问题或福利,9%的帖子强调了医疗状况、临床诊断或随之而来的福利;广泛的健康、健康和临床问题被引用。近一半(45%)的帖子提到了药物或正在接受药物治疗,而22%的帖子特别提到了医用大麻。还通过与食品相关的联系将健康联系起来,13%的帖子提到了饮食需求或营养声明,10%的帖子强调了暗示产品健康的与食品相关的特征。结论:与健康相关的内容在#edibles Instagram帖子中很普遍。应对未经证实的健康声明采取沟通方法,并考虑限制商业宣传的管制战略。食物与健康之间的明确联系以及通过标签和图像产生的更隐含的联系值得特别关注。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信