Current practice of using the airway pressure release ventilation mode in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients among respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia.

IF 2.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
SAGE Open Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/20503121241312941
Abdullah A Alqarni, Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Rayan A Siraj, Ahmed H Alasimi, Jaber S Alqahtani, Hassan Alwafi, Mohammed A Almeshari, Nowaf Y Alobaidi, Mansour S Majrshi, Saeed M Alghamdi, Mohammed M Alyami
{"title":"Current practice of using the airway pressure release ventilation mode in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients among respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Abdullah A Alqarni, Abdulelah M Aldhahir, Rayan A Siraj, Ahmed H Alasimi, Jaber S Alqahtani, Hassan Alwafi, Mohammed A Almeshari, Nowaf Y Alobaidi, Mansour S Majrshi, Saeed M Alghamdi, Mohammed M Alyami","doi":"10.1177/20503121241312941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a limited data examining the practice of using the airway pressure release ventilation mode for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome among respiratory therapists.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the current practice and barriers when using airway pressure release ventilation mode in the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional online survey was disseminated between November 2022 and April 2023 to respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the respondents' characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 802 respiratory therapists (male: 59.60%) completed the survey. Five hundred nineteen (64.71%) did not receive training on airway pressure release ventilation mode. Moreover, 325 (40.52%) and 391 (48.75%) did not know if airway pressure release ventilation was used at their hospitals and if the mode was managed via protocol with acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Of the participants, 276 (34.41%) reported that plateau pressure should be used as a target when setting P-high initially, while 427 (53.24%) believed that the initial P-low should be equal to 0 cmH<sub>2</sub>O. Moreover, 468 (58.36%) believed that the initial T-high should be between 4 and 6 s, while 548 (68.33%) believed the initial T-low should be a set time (between 0.4 and 0.8) seconds. The most appropriate intervention to improve ventilation and oxygenation was to increase the P-high, which was reported by 370 (46.14%) and 326 (40.65%) respiratory therapists, respectively. Inadequate training was the most common barrier (678, 84.54%) to airway pressure release ventilation implementation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Airway pressure release ventilation management varies between respiratory therapists which may be due to inadequate training and the absence of protocols.</p>","PeriodicalId":21398,"journal":{"name":"SAGE Open Medicine","volume":"13 ","pages":"20503121241312941"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SAGE Open Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121241312941","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a limited data examining the practice of using the airway pressure release ventilation mode for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome among respiratory therapists.

Objectives: To evaluate the current practice and barriers when using airway pressure release ventilation mode in the management of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Methods: A cross-sectional online survey was disseminated between November 2022 and April 2023 to respiratory therapists in Saudi Arabia. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the respondents' characteristics.

Results: Overall, 802 respiratory therapists (male: 59.60%) completed the survey. Five hundred nineteen (64.71%) did not receive training on airway pressure release ventilation mode. Moreover, 325 (40.52%) and 391 (48.75%) did not know if airway pressure release ventilation was used at their hospitals and if the mode was managed via protocol with acute respiratory distress syndrome patients. Of the participants, 276 (34.41%) reported that plateau pressure should be used as a target when setting P-high initially, while 427 (53.24%) believed that the initial P-low should be equal to 0 cmH2O. Moreover, 468 (58.36%) believed that the initial T-high should be between 4 and 6 s, while 548 (68.33%) believed the initial T-low should be a set time (between 0.4 and 0.8) seconds. The most appropriate intervention to improve ventilation and oxygenation was to increase the P-high, which was reported by 370 (46.14%) and 326 (40.65%) respiratory therapists, respectively. Inadequate training was the most common barrier (678, 84.54%) to airway pressure release ventilation implementation.

Conclusion: Airway pressure release ventilation management varies between respiratory therapists which may be due to inadequate training and the absence of protocols.

沙特阿拉伯呼吸治疗师在急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中使用气道压力释放通气模式的当前实践。
背景:在呼吸治疗师中,对急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者使用气道压力释放通气模式的实践进行了有限的研究。目的:评价急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者采用气道压力释放通气模式的现状及障碍。方法:在2022年11月至2023年4月期间,对沙特阿拉伯的呼吸治疗师进行横断面在线调查。采用描述性统计分析被调查者的特征。结果:共有802名呼吸治疗师(男性占59.60%)完成调查。519例(64.71%)未接受气道压力释放通气方式培训。此外,325人(40.52%)和391人(48.75%)不知道其所在医院是否使用气道压力释放通气,以及是否通过急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的方案管理该模式。276人(34.41%)认为初始P-high应以平台压力为目标,427人(53.24%)认为初始P-low应等于0 cmH2O。468人(58.36%)认为初始T-high应该在4 - 6秒之间,548人(68.33%)认为初始T-low应该是一个设定时间(0.4 - 0.8秒)。改善通气和氧合最合适的干预措施是增加P-high,分别有370名(46.14%)和326名(40.65%)呼吸治疗师报告了P-high。培训不足是实施气道压力释放通气最常见的障碍(678例,84.54%)。结论:不同呼吸治疗师的气道压力释放通气管理存在差异,这可能是由于培训不足和缺乏协议所致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SAGE Open Medicine
SAGE Open Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
289
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信