Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation Tool in College Students.

IF 2.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Psychology Research and Behavior Management Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PRBM.S491302
Ze Yu, Youyang Wang, Yiyun Li, Wei Feng
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation Tool in College Students.","authors":"Ze Yu, Youyang Wang, Yiyun Li, Wei Feng","doi":"10.2147/PRBM.S491302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognition is central to acquiring knowledge and learning new experiences, critical for social behavior and quality of life. Despite its importance, traditional cognitive assessment tools face limitations, including high labor costs and human error, underscoring an urgent need for cost-effective, precise tools to assess cognitive functions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation (ACE) tool among college students, thereby contributing to the advancement of cognitive research and disease management strategies in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected data from 150 participants (72 males, 78 females) with an average age of 20.97 ±3.36 years. A baseline assessment was conducted using the ACE Chinese version, Digit Span Memory Test (DSMT), and Line-trailing Test-A & B (LTT-A&B). After one week, the ACE tests were administered again to assess test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicated no significant correlations between age, sex, and the outcomes of the sub-tests. However, a significant association was found between educational level and the results of the sub-tests. The Cronbach's α for each sub-test exceeded 0.8, indicating high reliability. Both the I-CVI and S-CVI indexes were 1.00, demonstrating strong content validity. When DSMT, LTT-A, and LTT-B were used as criteria, most sub-tests showed satisfactory criterion validity. The factor-loading coefficient for each dimension of cognitive control was greater than 0.4, and the cumulative variance explanation rate was 64.84%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Chinese version of the ACE tool demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, making it an efficient tool for cognitive function assessment among college students.</p>","PeriodicalId":20954,"journal":{"name":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","volume":"18 ","pages":"105-118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11745064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology Research and Behavior Management","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S491302","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognition is central to acquiring knowledge and learning new experiences, critical for social behavior and quality of life. Despite its importance, traditional cognitive assessment tools face limitations, including high labor costs and human error, underscoring an urgent need for cost-effective, precise tools to assess cognitive functions.

Objective: This study aims to address this gap by evaluating the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Adaptive Cognitive Evaluation (ACE) tool among college students, thereby contributing to the advancement of cognitive research and disease management strategies in China.

Methods: We collected data from 150 participants (72 males, 78 females) with an average age of 20.97 ±3.36 years. A baseline assessment was conducted using the ACE Chinese version, Digit Span Memory Test (DSMT), and Line-trailing Test-A & B (LTT-A&B). After one week, the ACE tests were administered again to assess test-retest reliability.

Results: The results indicated no significant correlations between age, sex, and the outcomes of the sub-tests. However, a significant association was found between educational level and the results of the sub-tests. The Cronbach's α for each sub-test exceeded 0.8, indicating high reliability. Both the I-CVI and S-CVI indexes were 1.00, demonstrating strong content validity. When DSMT, LTT-A, and LTT-B were used as criteria, most sub-tests showed satisfactory criterion validity. The factor-loading coefficient for each dimension of cognitive control was greater than 0.4, and the cumulative variance explanation rate was 64.84%.

Conclusion: The Chinese version of the ACE tool demonstrated satisfactory reliability and validity, making it an efficient tool for cognitive function assessment among college students.

大学生自适应认知评价工具中文版的信效度。
背景:认知是获取知识和学习新经验的核心,对社会行为和生活质量至关重要。尽管其重要性,传统的认知评估工具面临局限性,包括高人工成本和人为错误,强调迫切需要具有成本效益的,精确的工具来评估认知功能。目的:本研究旨在通过对大学生适应性认知评估(ACE)工具中文版的信度和效度进行评估,以弥补这一空白,从而促进中国认知研究和疾病管理策略的发展。方法:研究对象150人,男72人,女78人,平均年龄20.97±3.36岁。采用ACE中文版、数字广度记忆测试(DSMT)和行尾测试(LTT-A&B)进行基线评估。一周后,再次进行ACE测试以评估重测信度。结果:结果显示年龄、性别与子测试结果之间无显著相关性。然而,在教育水平和子测试结果之间发现了显著的关联。各子检验的Cronbach’s α均大于0.8,信度较高。I-CVI和S-CVI指标均为1.00,内容效度较强。当以DSMT、LTT-A和LTT-B为标准时,大多数子测试的效度都令人满意。认知控制各维度的因子负荷系数均大于0.4,累积方差解释率为64.84%。结论:ACE量表具有良好的信度和效度,是一种有效的大学生认知功能评估工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.70%
发文量
341
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychology Research and Behavior Management is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on the science of psychology and its application in behavior management to develop improved outcomes in the clinical, educational, sports and business arenas. Specific topics covered in the journal include: -Neuroscience, memory and decision making -Behavior modification and management -Clinical applications -Business and sports performance management -Social and developmental studies -Animal studies The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical studies, surveys, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, case reports and extended reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信