Evaluating self-efficacy as a treatment mechanism during an intensive treatment program for posttraumatic stress disorder.

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Jonathan W Murphy, Chelsea Shotwell-Tabke, Dale L Smith, Zerbrina Valdespino-Hayden, Emily Patton, Sarah Pridgen, Philip Held
{"title":"Evaluating self-efficacy as a treatment mechanism during an intensive treatment program for posttraumatic stress disorder.","authors":"Jonathan W Murphy, Chelsea Shotwell-Tabke, Dale L Smith, Zerbrina Valdespino-Hayden, Emily Patton, Sarah Pridgen, Philip Held","doi":"10.1037/tra0001836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although traumatic exposures are common, only a small percentage of people exposed to trauma go on to develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This phenomenon suggests that there may be psychological factors that influence posttraumatic recovery trajectories. Beliefs about one's ability to cope with traumatic events have been proposed as a mechanism of posttraumatic recovery. The present study evaluated coping self-efficacy (CSE) as a treatment mechanism.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data were collected from 423 military service members and veterans who completed a 2-week cognitive processing therapy-based intensive treatment program for PTSD. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the associations between CSE and clinical symptoms over time. CSE and clinical symptoms were assessed at baseline, every other day during treatment, and at posttreatment. In addition, general self-efficacy (GSE) was assessed at baseline and included in the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants reported that increases in CSE began early and steadily increased across all domains during treatment. In addition, decreases in PTSD and depression severity also began early and steadily decreased during treatment. Although improvements in CSE predicted decreases in clinical symptoms, changes in CSE did not precede clinical improvement. Baseline GSE was a significant predictor of clinical outcomes, but changes in clinical symptoms during treatment did not differ based on one's baseline GSE.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The present study demonstrated that although changes in CSE do not temporarily precede changes in clinical symptoms, changes in CSE predicted changes in clinical symptoms, suggesting that CSE may serve as an indicator of treatment response. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"1192-1201"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001836","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although traumatic exposures are common, only a small percentage of people exposed to trauma go on to develop posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This phenomenon suggests that there may be psychological factors that influence posttraumatic recovery trajectories. Beliefs about one's ability to cope with traumatic events have been proposed as a mechanism of posttraumatic recovery. The present study evaluated coping self-efficacy (CSE) as a treatment mechanism.

Method: Data were collected from 423 military service members and veterans who completed a 2-week cognitive processing therapy-based intensive treatment program for PTSD. Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the associations between CSE and clinical symptoms over time. CSE and clinical symptoms were assessed at baseline, every other day during treatment, and at posttreatment. In addition, general self-efficacy (GSE) was assessed at baseline and included in the analyses.

Results: Participants reported that increases in CSE began early and steadily increased across all domains during treatment. In addition, decreases in PTSD and depression severity also began early and steadily decreased during treatment. Although improvements in CSE predicted decreases in clinical symptoms, changes in CSE did not precede clinical improvement. Baseline GSE was a significant predictor of clinical outcomes, but changes in clinical symptoms during treatment did not differ based on one's baseline GSE.

Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that although changes in CSE do not temporarily precede changes in clinical symptoms, changes in CSE predicted changes in clinical symptoms, suggesting that CSE may serve as an indicator of treatment response. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

评估自我效能感在创伤后应激障碍强化治疗计划中的治疗机制。
目的:虽然创伤性暴露很常见,但只有一小部分暴露于创伤的人会发展为创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)。这一现象表明,可能存在影响创伤后恢复轨迹的心理因素。关于一个人处理创伤事件的能力的信念被认为是创伤后恢复的一种机制。本研究评估了应对自我效能作为一种治疗机制。方法:收集423名军人和退伍军人的数据,这些军人和退伍军人完成了为期2周的创伤后应激障碍认知加工强化治疗项目。线性混合效应模型用于评估CSE与临床症状之间随时间的关系。在基线、治疗期间和治疗后每隔一天评估一次CSE和临床症状。此外,一般自我效能(GSE)在基线时进行评估并纳入分析。结果:参与者报告CSE的增加开始较早,并在治疗期间所有领域稳步增加。此外,创伤后应激障碍和抑郁严重程度的下降也开始得早,并在治疗期间稳步下降。虽然CSE的改善预示着临床症状的减少,但CSE的改变并不先于临床改善。基线GSE是临床结果的重要预测因子,但治疗期间临床症状的变化并没有基于一个人的基线GSE。结论:本研究表明,虽然CSE的变化不会暂时先于临床症状的变化,但CSE的变化预测了临床症状的变化,提示CSE可以作为治疗反应的指标。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信