D1 dopamine / mu opioid receptor interactions in operant conditioning assays of pain-depressed responding and drug-induced rate suppression, and a conditioned place preference procedure: assessment of therapeutic index in male Sprague Dawley rats.
{"title":"D<sub>1</sub> dopamine / mu opioid receptor interactions in operant conditioning assays of pain-depressed responding and drug-induced rate suppression, and a conditioned place preference procedure: assessment of therapeutic index in male Sprague Dawley rats.","authors":"Hannah LaCourse, Lily Bennett, April Falstad, Francesca Asmus, Meghan Smith, Ravin Davis, Kylee Harrington, Denise Giuvelis, Tamara King, Glenn W Stevenson","doi":"10.1007/s00213-025-06743-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>In vivo receptor interactions vary as a function of behavioral endpoint, with key differences between reflexive and non-reflexive measures that assess the motivational aspects of pain and pain relief. There have been no assessments of D<sub>1</sub> dopamine agonist / mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist interactions in non-reflexive behavioral measures of pain. We examined the hypothesis that D<sub>1</sub>/MOR mixtures show enhanced effectiveness in blocking pain depressed behaviors while showing decreased side effects such as sedation and drug reward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SKF82958 and methadone were used as selective/high efficacy D<sub>1</sub> and mu agonists, respectively. An FR10 operant schedule was utilized in the presence and absence of a lactic acid inflammatory pain-like manipulation, to measure antinociceptive and operant-rate-suppressing effects, respectively. Rewarding properties of the drug combinations were determined using a conditioned place preference procedure.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Methadone alone, but not SKF82958 alone, produced dose-dependent restoration of pain-depressed responding. Both SKF82958 and methadone produced dose-dependent response rate suppression. Three fixed proportion mixtures, based on the relative potencies of the drugs in the rate suppression assay, produced dose-dependent antinociception and sedation. Isobolographic analysis indicated that the 0.17:1 mixture produced supra-additive antinociception and additive sedation. The 0.055:1 mixture produced additive antinociception with sub-additive sedation, and the 0.018:1 mixture had the highest therapeutic index (TI) relative to other mixtures and drugs alone. The antinociceptive doses and component doses for the 0.018:1 mixture did not produce conditioned place preference.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results suggest that D<sub>1</sub>-selective dopamine agonists may have utility as candidate opioid-sparing analgesics.</p>","PeriodicalId":20783,"journal":{"name":"Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-025-06743-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Rationale and objectives: In vivo receptor interactions vary as a function of behavioral endpoint, with key differences between reflexive and non-reflexive measures that assess the motivational aspects of pain and pain relief. There have been no assessments of D1 dopamine agonist / mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonist interactions in non-reflexive behavioral measures of pain. We examined the hypothesis that D1/MOR mixtures show enhanced effectiveness in blocking pain depressed behaviors while showing decreased side effects such as sedation and drug reward.
Methods: SKF82958 and methadone were used as selective/high efficacy D1 and mu agonists, respectively. An FR10 operant schedule was utilized in the presence and absence of a lactic acid inflammatory pain-like manipulation, to measure antinociceptive and operant-rate-suppressing effects, respectively. Rewarding properties of the drug combinations were determined using a conditioned place preference procedure.
Results: Methadone alone, but not SKF82958 alone, produced dose-dependent restoration of pain-depressed responding. Both SKF82958 and methadone produced dose-dependent response rate suppression. Three fixed proportion mixtures, based on the relative potencies of the drugs in the rate suppression assay, produced dose-dependent antinociception and sedation. Isobolographic analysis indicated that the 0.17:1 mixture produced supra-additive antinociception and additive sedation. The 0.055:1 mixture produced additive antinociception with sub-additive sedation, and the 0.018:1 mixture had the highest therapeutic index (TI) relative to other mixtures and drugs alone. The antinociceptive doses and component doses for the 0.018:1 mixture did not produce conditioned place preference.
Conclusions: These results suggest that D1-selective dopamine agonists may have utility as candidate opioid-sparing analgesics.
期刊介绍：
Official Journal of the European Behavioural Pharmacology Society (EBPS)
Psychopharmacology is an international journal that covers the broad topic of elucidating mechanisms by which drugs affect behavior. The scope of the journal encompasses the following fields:
Human Psychopharmacology: Experimental
This section includes manuscripts describing the effects of drugs on mood, behavior, cognition and physiology in humans. The journal encourages submissions that involve brain imaging, genetics, neuroendocrinology, and developmental topics. Usually manuscripts in this section describe studies conducted under controlled conditions, but occasionally descriptive or observational studies are also considered.
Human Psychopharmacology: Clinical and Translational
This section comprises studies addressing the broad intersection of drugs and psychiatric illness. This includes not only clinical trials and studies of drug usage and metabolism, drug surveillance, and pharmacoepidemiology, but also work utilizing the entire range of clinically relevant methodologies, including neuroimaging, pharmacogenetics, cognitive science, biomarkers, and others. Work directed toward the translation of preclinical to clinical knowledge is especially encouraged. The key feature of submissions to this section is that they involve a focus on clinical aspects.
Preclinical psychopharmacology: Behavioral and Neural
This section considers reports on the effects of compounds with defined chemical structures on any aspect of behavior, in particular when correlated with neurochemical effects, in species other than humans. Manuscripts containing neuroscientific techniques in combination with behavior are welcome. We encourage reports of studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action, at the behavioral and molecular levels.
Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Translational
This section considers manuscripts that enhance the confidence in a central mechanism that could be of therapeutic value for psychiatric or neurological patients, using disease-relevant preclinical models and tests, or that report on preclinical manipulations and challenges that have the potential to be translated to the clinic. Studies aiming at the refinement of preclinical models based upon clinical findings (back-translation) will also be considered. The journal particularly encourages submissions that integrate measures of target tissue exposure, activity on the molecular target and/or modulation of the targeted biochemical pathways.
Preclinical Psychopharmacology: Molecular, Genetic and Epigenetic
This section focuses on the molecular and cellular actions of neuropharmacological agents / drugs, and the identification / validation of drug targets affecting the CNS in health and disease. We particularly encourage studies that provide insight into the mechanisms of drug action at the molecular level. Manuscripts containing evidence for genetic or epigenetic effects on neurochemistry or behavior are welcome.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
