Jennifer Dens Higano, Kathryn Burns, Geoffrey Smith, Ryan Solinsky
{"title":"Correlating autonomic physiology with symptoms of autonomic dysreflexia after spinal cord injury.","authors":"Jennifer Dens Higano, Kathryn Burns, Geoffrey Smith, Ryan Solinsky","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly have autonomic dysreflexia (AD) with increased sympathetic activity. After SCI, individuals have decreased baroreflex sensitivity and increased vascular responsiveness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the relationship between baroreflex and blood vessel sensitivity with AD symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Case control.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Tertiary academic center.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>14 individuals with SCI, 17 matched uninjured controls.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>All participants quantified AD symptoms using the Autonomic Dysfunction Following SCI (ADFSCI)-AD survey. Participants received three intravenous phenylephrine boluses, reproducibly increasing systolic blood pressure (SBP) 15-40 mmHg. Continuous heart rate (R-R interval, ECG), beat-to-beat blood pressures (Finapres), and popliteal artery flow velocity were recorded. Vascular responsiveness (α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity) and heart rate responsiveness to increased SBP (baroreflex sensitivity) were calculated.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Baroreflex sensitivity after increased SBP; Vascular responsiveness through quantified mean arterial pressure (MAP) 2-minute area under the curve and change in vascular resistance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SCI and control cohorts were well matched with mean age 31.9 and 29.6 years (p = .41); 21.4% and 17.6% female, respectively. Baseline MAP (p = .83) and R-R interval (p = .39) were similar. ADFSCI-AD scores were higher following SCI (27.9 ± 22.9 vs. 4.2 ± 2.9 in controls, p = .002). To quantify SBP response, MAP area under the curve was normalized to dose/body weight. Individuals with SCI had significantly larger responses (0.26 ± 0.19 mmHg*s/kg*μg) than controls (0.06 ± 0.06 mmHg*s/kg*μg, p = .002). Similarly, leg vascular resistance increased after SCI (24% vs. 6% to a normalized dose, p = .007). Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly lower after SCI (15.0 ± 8.3 vs. 23.7 ± 9.3 ms/mmHg, p = .01). ADFSCI-AD subscore had no meaningful correlation with vascular responsiveness (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.008) or baroreflex sensitivity (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.092) after SCI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although this confirms smaller previous studies suggesting increased α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity and lower baroreflex sensitivity in individuals with SCI, contrary to our hypothesis these differences lacked correlation to increased symptoms of AD. Further research into physiologic mechanisms is needed to explain why some individuals with SCI develop symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13295","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Individuals with spinal cord injury (SCI) commonly have autonomic dysreflexia (AD) with increased sympathetic activity. After SCI, individuals have decreased baroreflex sensitivity and increased vascular responsiveness.
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between baroreflex and blood vessel sensitivity with AD symptoms.
Design: Case control.
Setting: Tertiary academic center.
Patients: 14 individuals with SCI, 17 matched uninjured controls.
Interventions: All participants quantified AD symptoms using the Autonomic Dysfunction Following SCI (ADFSCI)-AD survey. Participants received three intravenous phenylephrine boluses, reproducibly increasing systolic blood pressure (SBP) 15-40 mmHg. Continuous heart rate (R-R interval, ECG), beat-to-beat blood pressures (Finapres), and popliteal artery flow velocity were recorded. Vascular responsiveness (α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity) and heart rate responsiveness to increased SBP (baroreflex sensitivity) were calculated.
Main outcome measures: Baroreflex sensitivity after increased SBP; Vascular responsiveness through quantified mean arterial pressure (MAP) 2-minute area under the curve and change in vascular resistance.
Results: SCI and control cohorts were well matched with mean age 31.9 and 29.6 years (p = .41); 21.4% and 17.6% female, respectively. Baseline MAP (p = .83) and R-R interval (p = .39) were similar. ADFSCI-AD scores were higher following SCI (27.9 ± 22.9 vs. 4.2 ± 2.9 in controls, p = .002). To quantify SBP response, MAP area under the curve was normalized to dose/body weight. Individuals with SCI had significantly larger responses (0.26 ± 0.19 mmHg*s/kg*μg) than controls (0.06 ± 0.06 mmHg*s/kg*μg, p = .002). Similarly, leg vascular resistance increased after SCI (24% vs. 6% to a normalized dose, p = .007). Baroreflex sensitivity was significantly lower after SCI (15.0 ± 8.3 vs. 23.7 ± 9.3 ms/mmHg, p = .01). ADFSCI-AD subscore had no meaningful correlation with vascular responsiveness (R2 = 0.008) or baroreflex sensitivity (R2 = 0.092) after SCI.
Conclusions: Although this confirms smaller previous studies suggesting increased α1 adrenoreceptor sensitivity and lower baroreflex sensitivity in individuals with SCI, contrary to our hypothesis these differences lacked correlation to increased symptoms of AD. Further research into physiologic mechanisms is needed to explain why some individuals with SCI develop symptoms.
期刊介绍:
Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.