Social Media-Based Pain Neuroscience Education for Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
You Kyoung Cho, You Lee Jung, Ain Im, Se Jin Hong, Kyounghae Kim
{"title":"Social Media-Based Pain Neuroscience Education for Temporomandibular Joint Disorder: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"You Kyoung Cho, You Lee Jung, Ain Im, Se Jin Hong, Kyounghae Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To examine the feasibility of a social networking site-based self-management intervention involving pain neuroscience education (PNE) for temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) among young adults and its initial efficacy in exploratory outcomes, including pain and somatization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pilot randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Korean-speaking adults aged 20-29 with temporomandibular joint pain having smartphone Internet access. The one-week intervention included two animated videos on pain neuroscience and self-management instructions addressing poor habits limiting jaw movement and exercises to alleviate TMD symptoms. The control group received self-management guidance only. Besides pain, the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II assessed oral health and psychological aspects. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) Part A measured anxiety and central sensitization, respectively. Besides feasibility benchmarks, a t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to examine the initial efficacy of PNE plus self-management on self-management alone.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-six participants were included in the study, with 33 participants in each group. Most participants expressed satisfaction with both interventions, with retention rates exceeding 87%. Differences in pain somatization were reported (t = 2.03, p = .046) in the intervention group compared to the control group. Differences in pain (t = 1.80, p = .077) and depression (t = 1.88, p = .061) did not reach statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The feasibility of the PNE and self-management education was favorable. PNE, when combined with self-management, significantly reduced pain somatization compared with self-management alone.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>A social networking site-assisted self-management intervention for TMD can help nurses provide education in primary care settings and communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2024.12.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the feasibility of a social networking site-based self-management intervention involving pain neuroscience education (PNE) for temporomandibular joint disorders (TMD) among young adults and its initial efficacy in exploratory outcomes, including pain and somatization.

Design: Pilot randomized controlled trial.

Methods: Korean-speaking adults aged 20-29 with temporomandibular joint pain having smartphone Internet access. The one-week intervention included two animated videos on pain neuroscience and self-management instructions addressing poor habits limiting jaw movement and exercises to alleviate TMD symptoms. The control group received self-management guidance only. Besides pain, the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders Axis II assessed oral health and psychological aspects. The Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7 Scale and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) Part A measured anxiety and central sensitization, respectively. Besides feasibility benchmarks, a t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to examine the initial efficacy of PNE plus self-management on self-management alone.

Results: Sixty-six participants were included in the study, with 33 participants in each group. Most participants expressed satisfaction with both interventions, with retention rates exceeding 87%. Differences in pain somatization were reported (t = 2.03, p = .046) in the intervention group compared to the control group. Differences in pain (t = 1.80, p = .077) and depression (t = 1.88, p = .061) did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions: The feasibility of the PNE and self-management education was favorable. PNE, when combined with self-management, significantly reduced pain somatization compared with self-management alone.

Clinical implications: A social networking site-assisted self-management intervention for TMD can help nurses provide education in primary care settings and communities.

基于社交媒体的颞下颌关节紊乱疼痛神经科学教育:一项随机对照试验。
目的:探讨基于社交网站的自我管理干预(包括疼痛神经科学教育(PNE))对年轻人颞下颌关节疾病(TMD)的可行性及其在探索性结果(包括疼痛和躯体化)方面的初步疗效。设计:先导随机对照试验。方法:年龄在20-29岁、患有颞下颌关节疼痛的韩语成年人,使用智能手机上网。为期一周的干预包括两个关于疼痛神经科学的动画视频和自我管理指导,解决限制下颌运动的不良习惯和减轻TMD症状的锻炼。对照组仅接受自我管理指导。除了疼痛,颞下颌疾病的研究诊断标准轴II评估了口腔健康和心理方面。广泛性焦虑障碍7量表和中枢致敏性量表(CSI) A部分分别测量焦虑和中枢致敏性。除了可行性基准外,我们还采用t检验和Mann-Whitney U检验来检验PNE +自我管理对单独自我管理的初始效果。结果:共纳入66例受试者,每组33例。大多数参与者对两种干预措施都表示满意,保留率超过87%。干预组疼痛躯体化与对照组比较差异有统计学意义(t = 2.03, p = 0.046)。疼痛(t = 1.80, p = 0.077)和抑郁(t = 1.88, p = 0.061)差异无统计学意义。结论:PNE与自我管理教育的可行性较好。与单独的自我管理相比,PNE与自我管理相结合,显著降低了疼痛躯体化。临床意义:社交网站辅助TMD自我管理干预可以帮助护士在初级保健机构和社区提供教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信