Matching Into Integrated Plastic Surgery: The Impact of USMLE Step 1 Transition to Pass/Fail: Did the 2019 Predictions Come True in 2024?

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006417
Lyndsay R Boyd, Lawrence O Lin, Jeffrey E Janis
{"title":"Matching Into Integrated Plastic Surgery: The Impact of USMLE Step 1 Transition to Pass/Fail: Did the 2019 Predictions Come True in 2024?","authors":"Lyndsay R Boyd, Lawrence O Lin, Jeffrey E Janis","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The first class of integrated plastic surgery residency applicants with pass/fail (P/F) step 1 assessments occurred during the 2023-2024 Match cycle. This study analyzes the results of a 2024 postmatch survey to program directors (PDs) regarding the impact of the conversion to P/F step 1 scoring and compares the results to the 2019 survey that attempted to predict how this conversion would influence decision-making when it was initially announced.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 26-item survey evaluating PDs' perspectives on applicant characteristics and the application process following P/F step 1 scoring was distributed March 2024. Data were analyzed using summary tables, marginal homogeneity tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-seven plastic surgery PDs completed the survey (response rate = 46.3%). The top 3 most important metrics for determining applicant interview invitations after step 1 P/F conversion were participation in an away rotation, letters of recommendation, and involvement in research, while ultimately match rank list order emphasized quality of the applicant's interview. A total of 68.1% of PDs agree that it was more difficult to differentiate applicants without a numerical step 1 score. A total of 51.5% of PDs reported using step 2 clinical knowledge scores to screen applicants. PDs' opinions on factors influencing the 2023-2024 Match cycle did not significantly change from predictions studied in 2019.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Program directors felt that in the 2023-2024 cycle, it was more difficult to differentiate between applicants, leading to increased emphasis on other characteristics such as away rotations, letters of recommendation, step 2 clinical knowledge scores, and research. There was no difference from what was predicted.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6417"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11737487/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The first class of integrated plastic surgery residency applicants with pass/fail (P/F) step 1 assessments occurred during the 2023-2024 Match cycle. This study analyzes the results of a 2024 postmatch survey to program directors (PDs) regarding the impact of the conversion to P/F step 1 scoring and compares the results to the 2019 survey that attempted to predict how this conversion would influence decision-making when it was initially announced.

Methods: A 26-item survey evaluating PDs' perspectives on applicant characteristics and the application process following P/F step 1 scoring was distributed March 2024. Data were analyzed using summary tables, marginal homogeneity tests, and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results: Thirty-seven plastic surgery PDs completed the survey (response rate = 46.3%). The top 3 most important metrics for determining applicant interview invitations after step 1 P/F conversion were participation in an away rotation, letters of recommendation, and involvement in research, while ultimately match rank list order emphasized quality of the applicant's interview. A total of 68.1% of PDs agree that it was more difficult to differentiate applicants without a numerical step 1 score. A total of 51.5% of PDs reported using step 2 clinical knowledge scores to screen applicants. PDs' opinions on factors influencing the 2023-2024 Match cycle did not significantly change from predictions studied in 2019.

Conclusions: Program directors felt that in the 2023-2024 cycle, it was more difficult to differentiate between applicants, leading to increased emphasis on other characteristics such as away rotations, letters of recommendation, step 2 clinical knowledge scores, and research. There was no difference from what was predicted.

与综合整形手术相匹配:USMLE第一步过渡到合格/不合格的影响:2019年的预测在2024年实现了吗?
背景:第一批通过/不通过(P/F)第一步评估的综合整形外科住院医师申请人发生在2023-2024匹配周期。本研究分析了2024年对项目主管(pd)进行的关于P/F第一步得分转换影响的赛后调查结果,并将结果与2019年的调查结果进行了比较,该调查试图预测这种转换在最初宣布时将如何影响决策。方法:采用P/F第1步评分法,于2024年3月进行问卷调查,问卷共26个项目,评估医生对申请人特征和申请过程的看法。采用汇总表、边际齐性检验和Mann-Whitney U检验对数据进行分析。结果:37名整形外科医师完成调查,回复率为46.3%。在第一步P/F转换之后,决定申请人面试邀请的前三个最重要的指标是参加客场轮换,推荐信和参与研究,而最终匹配排名顺序强调申请人面试的质量。68.1%的pd认为,如果没有数字1分,很难区分申请人。共有51.5%的pd报告使用第二步临床知识评分来筛选申请人。pd对2023-2024年比赛周期影响因素的看法与2019年研究的预测没有明显变化。结论:项目主管认为,在2023-2024周期,区分申请人变得更加困难,导致对其他特征的重视增加,如轮转、推荐信、第二步临床知识评分和研究。这与预测没有什么不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信