Jason C Llaneras, Robert Craig Clark, Lauren Antognoli, Emily Finkelstein, Luci Hulsman, Luther Holton, Devinder Singh, R Jason VonderHaar, Risal Djohan, Aladdin H Hassanein, Chris M Reid
{"title":"The Efficacy of Single-Application NPWTi-d for the Salvage of Infected Breast Prostheses: A Multi-Center Study.","authors":"Jason C Llaneras, Robert Craig Clark, Lauren Antognoli, Emily Finkelstein, Luci Hulsman, Luther Holton, Devinder Singh, R Jason VonderHaar, Risal Djohan, Aladdin H Hassanein, Chris M Reid","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Breast prosthesis infections are challenging and traditionally managed with prosthesis removal and delayed reconstruction. Single-application negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) has shown promise for salvaging infected implants, though prior studies have been small and heterogeneous. This study analyzes outcomes and compares protocols from four institutions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were collected on 56 patients (59 breasts) who underwent NPWTi-d salvage for peri-prosthetic infections. Patients with fewer than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Salvage protocols included explantation, NPWTi-d application, antibiotics, and replantation. Successful salvage was defined as prosthesis retention without further explantation for at least 90 days posttreatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intervention occurred on average 66 days after the index procedure. Methicillin-resistant organisms were cultured in 15% of cases. NPWTi-d was applied for an average of 61 hours with dwell times of 18 minutes every 3 hours, using institution-specific instillates. All patients were discharged with new prostheses (65% expanders, 35% implants) after an average hospital stay of 4 days. At 90-day follow-up, 71% of patients had no further complications, and 85% were successfully salvaged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the largest study to evaluate NPWTi-d for salvaging infected breast prostheses. The high success rate highlights the method's efficacy, safety, and potential for preserving reconstruction. These straightforward protocols can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs, offering a valuable option for managing prosthesis infections.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 1","pages":"e6467"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11741211/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Breast prosthesis infections are challenging and traditionally managed with prosthesis removal and delayed reconstruction. Single-application negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwell (NPWTi-d) has shown promise for salvaging infected implants, though prior studies have been small and heterogeneous. This study analyzes outcomes and compares protocols from four institutions.
Methods: Data were collected on 56 patients (59 breasts) who underwent NPWTi-d salvage for peri-prosthetic infections. Patients with fewer than 3 months of follow-up were excluded. Salvage protocols included explantation, NPWTi-d application, antibiotics, and replantation. Successful salvage was defined as prosthesis retention without further explantation for at least 90 days posttreatment.
Results: Intervention occurred on average 66 days after the index procedure. Methicillin-resistant organisms were cultured in 15% of cases. NPWTi-d was applied for an average of 61 hours with dwell times of 18 minutes every 3 hours, using institution-specific instillates. All patients were discharged with new prostheses (65% expanders, 35% implants) after an average hospital stay of 4 days. At 90-day follow-up, 71% of patients had no further complications, and 85% were successfully salvaged.
Conclusions: This is the largest study to evaluate NPWTi-d for salvaging infected breast prostheses. The high success rate highlights the method's efficacy, safety, and potential for preserving reconstruction. These straightforward protocols can significantly improve patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs, offering a valuable option for managing prosthesis infections.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.