Outcome prediction for late-onset sepsis after premature birth.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Francesca Miselli, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Melissa Maugeri, Elisa Deonette, Sofia Mazzotti, Luca Bedetti, Licia Lugli, Katia Rossi, MariaFederica Roversi, Alberto Berardi
{"title":"Outcome prediction for late-onset sepsis after premature birth.","authors":"Francesca Miselli, Riccardo Cuoghi Costantini, Melissa Maugeri, Elisa Deonette, Sofia Mazzotti, Luca Bedetti, Licia Lugli, Katia Rossi, MariaFederica Roversi, Alberto Berardi","doi":"10.1038/s41390-025-03814-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our aim was to develop a quantitative model for immediately estimating the risk of death and/or brain injury in late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, based on objective and measurable data available at the time sepsis is first suspected (i.e., time of blood culture collection).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study on neonates ≤36 weeks' gestation with a positive blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture after 72 hours from birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 3217 preterm live births, 94 cases were included (median gestational age 26.5 weeks' IQR 25.0;28.0), of whom 26 (27.7%) had poor outcomes (17 death; 9 brain injuries). Infants with poor outcomes showed lower postnatal age (11.5 vs 12.5 days, p < 0.001), lower mean blood pressure (30.5 vs 43 mmHg, p < 0.001) and higher lactate levels (4.4 vs 1.5 mmol/l, p < 0.001). Our multivariable model showed good discrimination and calibration (c statistic=0.8618, Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.8532), stratifying the population into 3 groups: low-risk (sensitivity 97%, specificity 52%), middle-risk, and high-risk (sensitivity 77%, specificity 80%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This predictive model performs well as a practical and easy-to-use tool to help clinicians early identify the sickest neonates who may benefit from timely and aggressive support (e.g., central line, haemodynamic assessment) and close monitoring (e.g., 1:1 nursing assignment, frequent reassessments).</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>We lack data to early identify the severity of neonatal late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Delay in treatment contributes to poor prognosis. We developed a model for early prediction of poor outcomes (mortality and brain injuries). The model utilizes immediately available and measurable data at the time sepsis is first suspected. This can help clinicians in tailoring management based on individual risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":19829,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-025-03814-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our aim was to develop a quantitative model for immediately estimating the risk of death and/or brain injury in late-onset sepsis (LOS) in preterm infants, based on objective and measurable data available at the time sepsis is first suspected (i.e., time of blood culture collection).

Methods: Retrospective study on neonates ≤36 weeks' gestation with a positive blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid culture after 72 hours from birth.

Results: Among 3217 preterm live births, 94 cases were included (median gestational age 26.5 weeks' IQR 25.0;28.0), of whom 26 (27.7%) had poor outcomes (17 death; 9 brain injuries). Infants with poor outcomes showed lower postnatal age (11.5 vs 12.5 days, p < 0.001), lower mean blood pressure (30.5 vs 43 mmHg, p < 0.001) and higher lactate levels (4.4 vs 1.5 mmol/l, p < 0.001). Our multivariable model showed good discrimination and calibration (c statistic=0.8618, Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.8532), stratifying the population into 3 groups: low-risk (sensitivity 97%, specificity 52%), middle-risk, and high-risk (sensitivity 77%, specificity 80%).

Conclusion: This predictive model performs well as a practical and easy-to-use tool to help clinicians early identify the sickest neonates who may benefit from timely and aggressive support (e.g., central line, haemodynamic assessment) and close monitoring (e.g., 1:1 nursing assignment, frequent reassessments).

Impact: We lack data to early identify the severity of neonatal late-onset sepsis in preterm infants. Delay in treatment contributes to poor prognosis. We developed a model for early prediction of poor outcomes (mortality and brain injuries). The model utilizes immediately available and measurable data at the time sepsis is first suspected. This can help clinicians in tailoring management based on individual risks.

早产后迟发性脓毒症的预后预测。
背景:我们的目的是建立一个定量模型,根据首次怀疑脓毒症时(即血液培养收集时间)可获得的客观和可测量数据,立即估计早产儿迟发性脓毒症(LOS)死亡和/或脑损伤的风险。方法:回顾性研究出生72小时后血液和/或脑脊液培养阳性的≤36周妊娠新生儿。结果:在3217例早产活产中,纳入94例(中位胎龄26.5周IQR 25.0;28.0),其中26例(27.7%)预后不良(17例死亡;9脑损伤)。结论:该预测模型作为一种实用且易于使用的工具,可以很好地帮助临床医生早期识别病情最严重的新生儿,这些新生儿可能受益于及时和积极的支持(例如,中央静脉导管,血流动力学评估)和密切监测(例如,1:1护理分配,频繁重新评估)。影响:我们缺乏早期识别早产儿迟发性脓毒症严重程度的数据。治疗延误导致预后不良。我们开发了一个早期预测不良结果(死亡率和脑损伤)的模型。该模型利用第一次怀疑败血症时立即可用和可测量的数据。这可以帮助临床医生根据个人风险量身定制管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Research
Pediatric Research 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.60%
发文量
473
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Research publishes original papers, invited reviews, and commentaries on the etiologies of children''s diseases and disorders of development, extending from molecular biology to epidemiology. Use of model organisms and in vitro techniques relevant to developmental biology and medicine are acceptable, as are translational human studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信