The impact of side and top arm techniques during the backstroke breakout phase on 15-meter swimming performance.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-01-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18838
Zhenyu Jin, Yuhang Zhou, Dapeng Wang, Yuhong Wen
{"title":"The impact of side and top arm techniques during the backstroke breakout phase on 15-meter swimming performance.","authors":"Zhenyu Jin, Yuhang Zhou, Dapeng Wang, Yuhong Wen","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18838","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research on the swimming starts and turns in professional swimming has become increasingly refined. The breakout phase is a crucial transition from point between underwater and above-water movements. The side arm technique is commonly used during the backstroke breakout phase. However, some swimmers have also achieved good performance using the top arm technique. The impact of the two techniques during the backstroke breakout phase is yet to be explored.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare the velocity and key angles differences between the side arm and top arm techniques and analyze their effect on the first 15-m performance after push-off.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The subjects were 16 high-level swimmers: eight males (20.4 ± 1.6 yr) and eight females (20.9 ± 1.7 yr). Of these, 14 were backstrokers or had individual medley as their primary event. The best performances in the history of the sport's level World Aquatics Points are 682.1 ± 59.0 and 729.3 ± 41.5 for males and females, respectively. A within-subject design was used to test both the side arm and top arm techniques. Four underwater cameras were used to capture two-dimensional data from two perspectives, focusing on the breakout phase. A two-way ANOVA used to compare segment velocity, angles, and 15-m performance between the two genders and breakout techniques. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between segment velocity and 15-m performance, and hierarchical regression was employed to investigate the impact of breakout velocity on the 15-m performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both male and female swimmers exhibited a significantly faster top arm velocities of (1.72 ± 0.20 and 1.47 ± 0.16 m/s, respectively) compared to the side arm velocities (1.51 ± 0.23 and 1.29 ± 0.19 m/s, respectively) during the breakout phase. Additionally, significant differences were found between the two genders (<i>F</i> = 11.189, <i>p</i> = 0.002, <i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.286) and breakout techniques (<i>F</i> = 8.014, <i>p</i> = 0.008, <i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.223), with no interaction effect (<i>F</i> = 0.037, <i>p</i> = 0.849, <i>η<sup>2</sup></i> = 0.001). Furthermore, both male (<i>R</i> = -0.447, <i>p</i> = 0.109) and female (<i>R</i> = -0.555, <i>p</i> = 0.017) swimmers showed a moderate positive correlation between breakout velocity and 15-m performance, and the regression model indicated a significant impact on the 15-m performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The top arm technique during backstroke may offer a velocity advantage over the traditional side arm technique during the breakout phase, influencing 15-m performance. However, considering the short duration of the breakout phase, this advantage and its impact may need to be considered in conjunction with the smoothness of the transition to the subsequent phases.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e18838"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748401/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18838","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Research on the swimming starts and turns in professional swimming has become increasingly refined. The breakout phase is a crucial transition from point between underwater and above-water movements. The side arm technique is commonly used during the backstroke breakout phase. However, some swimmers have also achieved good performance using the top arm technique. The impact of the two techniques during the backstroke breakout phase is yet to be explored.

Purpose: To compare the velocity and key angles differences between the side arm and top arm techniques and analyze their effect on the first 15-m performance after push-off.

Methods: The subjects were 16 high-level swimmers: eight males (20.4 ± 1.6 yr) and eight females (20.9 ± 1.7 yr). Of these, 14 were backstrokers or had individual medley as their primary event. The best performances in the history of the sport's level World Aquatics Points are 682.1 ± 59.0 and 729.3 ± 41.5 for males and females, respectively. A within-subject design was used to test both the side arm and top arm techniques. Four underwater cameras were used to capture two-dimensional data from two perspectives, focusing on the breakout phase. A two-way ANOVA used to compare segment velocity, angles, and 15-m performance between the two genders and breakout techniques. Pearson's correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between segment velocity and 15-m performance, and hierarchical regression was employed to investigate the impact of breakout velocity on the 15-m performance.

Results: Both male and female swimmers exhibited a significantly faster top arm velocities of (1.72 ± 0.20 and 1.47 ± 0.16 m/s, respectively) compared to the side arm velocities (1.51 ± 0.23 and 1.29 ± 0.19 m/s, respectively) during the breakout phase. Additionally, significant differences were found between the two genders (F = 11.189, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.286) and breakout techniques (F = 8.014, p = 0.008, η2 = 0.223), with no interaction effect (F = 0.037, p = 0.849, η2 = 0.001). Furthermore, both male (R = -0.447, p = 0.109) and female (R = -0.555, p = 0.017) swimmers showed a moderate positive correlation between breakout velocity and 15-m performance, and the regression model indicated a significant impact on the 15-m performance.

Conclusion: The top arm technique during backstroke may offer a velocity advantage over the traditional side arm technique during the breakout phase, influencing 15-m performance. However, considering the short duration of the breakout phase, this advantage and its impact may need to be considered in conjunction with the smoothness of the transition to the subsequent phases.

仰泳突破阶段侧臂和上臂技术对15米游泳成绩的影响。
背景:对专业游泳中起跳转身动作的研究日趋完善。突破阶段是水下和水上运动之间的关键过渡阶段。侧臂技术通常用于仰泳突破阶段。然而,一些游泳运动员也取得了良好的成绩使用上臂技术。这两种技术在仰泳突破阶段的影响还有待探讨。目的:比较侧臂技术和上臂技术在速度和关键角度上的差异,并分析它们对蹬水后前15米成绩的影响。方法:选取高水平游泳运动员16例,男8例(20.4±1.6岁),女8例(20.9±1.7岁)。其中14人是仰泳运动员或以个人混合泳为主要项目。世界水平游泳历史上的最好成绩,男女分别为682.1±59.0分和729.3±41.5分。采用受试者内设计来测试侧臂和上臂技术。四台水下摄像机从两个角度捕捉二维数据,重点关注爆发阶段。双向方差分析用于比较两种性别和突破技术之间的分段速度、角度和15米表现。采用Pearson相关分析探讨分段速度与15-m性能之间的关系,采用分层回归分析研究突破速度对15-m性能的影响。结果:在突破阶段,男性和女性游泳运动员的上臂速度分别为(1.72±0.20和1.47±0.16)m/s,而侧臂速度分别为(1.51±0.23和1.29±0.19)m/s。此外,性别间和突破方式间存在显著性差异(F = 11.189, p = 0.002, η2 = 0.286),但无交互作用(F = 0.037, p = 0.849, η2 = 0.001)。此外,男性(R = -0.447, p = 0.109)和女性(R = -0.555, p = 0.017)游泳运动员的突破速度与15米成绩呈中等正相关,回归模型表明15米成绩对突破速度有显著影响。结论:仰泳中的上臂技术在突破阶段可能比传统的侧臂技术提供速度优势,影响15米的表现。然而,考虑到突破阶段的持续时间较短,这一优势及其影响可能需要与过渡到后续阶段的平滑性一起考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信