Association between phase angle, body mass index and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.3 3区 生物学 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PeerJ Pub Date : 2025-01-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.7717/peerj.18815
Yezi Hu, Hui Jin
{"title":"Association between phase angle, body mass index and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Yezi Hu, Hui Jin","doi":"10.7717/peerj.18815","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the associations between phase angle (PhA), body mass index (BMI) and insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). <b>Methods:</b> The retrospective cross-sectional study included 200 T2DM patients treated during 2018 to 2019 in Zhongda Hospital Southeast University. PhA and other body composition indicators were measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Subjects were classified into four groups based on body composition: low phase angle and low body mass index (LPLB), low phase angle and high body mass index (LPHB), high phase angle and low body mass index (HPLB) and high phase angle and high body mass index (HPHB). <b>Results:</b> Overall, in the unadjusted model and minor, all adjusted models (unadjusted model, models 1-4), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was higher in the LPHB group than in the LPLB group (<i>P</i> = 0.034). In the unadjusted model, Model 1 (adjustment for age), Model 2 (adjust for age+duration), Model 3 (adjust for age+duration+sex+UA+TG+TC) and Model 4 (adjust for age+duration+sex+UA+TG+TC+HDL+HbA1c), the adjusted ORs for participants were 4.4 (95% CI [1.72-11.24]), 4.41 (95% CI [1.73-11.27]), 4.75 (95% CI [1.83-12.32]), 2.93 (95% CI [1.04-8.23]) and 3.1 (95% CI [1.09-8.86]) respectively, compared to LPHB group. <b>Conclusions:</b> T2DM patients with the body composition of low phase angle and high body mass index exhibited the most severe degree and the highest risk of insulin resistance.</p>","PeriodicalId":19799,"journal":{"name":"PeerJ","volume":"13 ","pages":"e18815"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11742247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PeerJ","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.18815","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this analysis was to investigate the associations between phase angle (PhA), body mass index (BMI) and insulin resistance (IR) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Methods: The retrospective cross-sectional study included 200 T2DM patients treated during 2018 to 2019 in Zhongda Hospital Southeast University. PhA and other body composition indicators were measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA). Subjects were classified into four groups based on body composition: low phase angle and low body mass index (LPLB), low phase angle and high body mass index (LPHB), high phase angle and low body mass index (HPLB) and high phase angle and high body mass index (HPHB). Results: Overall, in the unadjusted model and minor, all adjusted models (unadjusted model, models 1-4), homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was higher in the LPHB group than in the LPLB group (P = 0.034). In the unadjusted model, Model 1 (adjustment for age), Model 2 (adjust for age+duration), Model 3 (adjust for age+duration+sex+UA+TG+TC) and Model 4 (adjust for age+duration+sex+UA+TG+TC+HDL+HbA1c), the adjusted ORs for participants were 4.4 (95% CI [1.72-11.24]), 4.41 (95% CI [1.73-11.27]), 4.75 (95% CI [1.83-12.32]), 2.93 (95% CI [1.04-8.23]) and 3.1 (95% CI [1.09-8.86]) respectively, compared to LPHB group. Conclusions: T2DM patients with the body composition of low phase angle and high body mass index exhibited the most severe degree and the highest risk of insulin resistance.

2型糖尿病患者相位角、体重指数与胰岛素抵抗的相关性:一项横断面研究
背景:本分析的目的是探讨2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者相位角(PhA)、体重指数(BMI)和胰岛素抵抗(IR)之间的关系。方法:对东南大学中大医院2018 - 2019年收治的200例T2DM患者进行回顾性横断面研究。采用生物电阻抗分析法(BIA)测定PhA等体成分指标。受试者根据身体组成分为低相角低体质指数(LPLB)组、低相角高体质指数(LPHB)组、高相角低体质指数(HPLB)组和高相角高体质指数(HPHB)组。结果:总体而言,在未调整模型和轻微调整模型中,所有调整模型(未调整模型,模型1-4),稳态模型评估胰岛素抵抗(HOMA-IR)在LPHB组高于LPLB组(P = 0.034)。在未调整的模型中,模型1(调整年龄)、模型2(调整年龄+病程)、模型3(调整年龄+病程+性别+UA+TG+TC)和模型4(调整年龄+病程+性别+UA+TG+TC+HDL+HbA1c),与LPHB组相比,调整后的or分别为4.4 (95% CI[1.72-11.24])、4.41 (95% CI[1.73-11.27])、4.75 (95% CI[1.83-12.32])、2.93 (95% CI[1.04-8.23])和3.1 (95% CI[1.09-8.86])。结论:低相角体成分、高体质指数的T2DM患者胰岛素抵抗程度最严重,风险最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PeerJ
PeerJ MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
1665
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: PeerJ is an open access peer-reviewed scientific journal covering research in the biological and medical sciences. At PeerJ, authors take out a lifetime publication plan (for as little as $99) which allows them to publish articles in the journal for free, forever. PeerJ has 5 Nobel Prize Winners on the Board; they have won several industry and media awards; and they are widely recognized as being one of the most interesting recent developments in academic publishing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信