The publication fate of abstracts awarded prizes at European Society of Paediatric Radiology annual scientific meetings.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Michael Paddock, Parasdeep S Bains, Ola Kvist, Savvas Andronikou, Stephanie Franchi-Abella, Rick R van Rijn, Owen J Arthurs, Amaka C Offiah
{"title":"The publication fate of abstracts awarded prizes at European Society of Paediatric Radiology annual scientific meetings.","authors":"Michael Paddock, Parasdeep S Bains, Ola Kvist, Savvas Andronikou, Stephanie Franchi-Abella, Rick R van Rijn, Owen J Arthurs, Amaka C Offiah","doi":"10.1007/s00247-024-06152-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) awards prizes for outstanding work presented at their annual scientific meetings. The proportion of ESPR prize-winning abstracts to journal publications is not known. Contextualising abstract-to-publication proportions by evaluating publication experience can yield valuable insights and actionable outcomes to support researchers in overcoming barriers to journal publication.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the abstract-to-publication proportion of prize-winning ESPR abstracts and prize-winning authors' experience of publishing in Pediatric Radiology, the affiliated journal of the ESPR and other specialist international paediatric radiology societies.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>PubMed was searched for titles of ESPR prize-winning abstracts from 1977 (the year of first award) up to and including 2021, where the presenter was either first or co-author, and the article was published 2 years before or after the presentation year. If not found, a general internet search was performed. Titles of all retrieved articles were evaluated for inclusion. A survey was distributed to all ESPR prize winners to better understand their experiences around journal submission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 44 years, 108 prizes were awarded. The prize-winning abstract-to-publication proportion was significantly higher (59.3%, OR=2.10, P=0.012) than the recently published pediatric radiology \"abstract to publication rate\" (41.9% from 2013-2016). Moreover, prize winners were more than twice as likely than to achieve journal publication (OR=2.10), and as first author (OR=1.33). The majority of awardees published their work as first author (52/64, 81.3%): the first-author abstract-to-publication proportion was not significantly higher than the paediatric radiology \"abstract-to-publication rate\" (48.1%, OR=0.33, P=0.330). Sixty-four survey responses were received (59.3%, out of a total 108 awarded prizes). Just over 20% of prize-winning work was published in Pediatric Radiology, with 41.5% of respondents reporting a good to excellent submission experience.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prize-winning and first-author abstract-to-publication proportions are higher for ESPR-awarded abstracts than the most recently reported paediatric radiology \"abstract-to-publication rate\", suggesting that prizes are either awarded to work most likely to be published or that being awarded a prize encourages publication. Given that just over 40% of prize-winning abstracts remain unpublished, the ESPR should do more to support and encourage all authors to publish their work.</p>","PeriodicalId":19755,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06152-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The European Society of Paediatric Radiology (ESPR) awards prizes for outstanding work presented at their annual scientific meetings. The proportion of ESPR prize-winning abstracts to journal publications is not known. Contextualising abstract-to-publication proportions by evaluating publication experience can yield valuable insights and actionable outcomes to support researchers in overcoming barriers to journal publication.

Objective: To assess the abstract-to-publication proportion of prize-winning ESPR abstracts and prize-winning authors' experience of publishing in Pediatric Radiology, the affiliated journal of the ESPR and other specialist international paediatric radiology societies.

Materials and methods: PubMed was searched for titles of ESPR prize-winning abstracts from 1977 (the year of first award) up to and including 2021, where the presenter was either first or co-author, and the article was published 2 years before or after the presentation year. If not found, a general internet search was performed. Titles of all retrieved articles were evaluated for inclusion. A survey was distributed to all ESPR prize winners to better understand their experiences around journal submission.

Results: Over 44 years, 108 prizes were awarded. The prize-winning abstract-to-publication proportion was significantly higher (59.3%, OR=2.10, P=0.012) than the recently published pediatric radiology "abstract to publication rate" (41.9% from 2013-2016). Moreover, prize winners were more than twice as likely than to achieve journal publication (OR=2.10), and as first author (OR=1.33). The majority of awardees published their work as first author (52/64, 81.3%): the first-author abstract-to-publication proportion was not significantly higher than the paediatric radiology "abstract-to-publication rate" (48.1%, OR=0.33, P=0.330). Sixty-four survey responses were received (59.3%, out of a total 108 awarded prizes). Just over 20% of prize-winning work was published in Pediatric Radiology, with 41.5% of respondents reporting a good to excellent submission experience.

Conclusion: Prize-winning and first-author abstract-to-publication proportions are higher for ESPR-awarded abstracts than the most recently reported paediatric radiology "abstract-to-publication rate", suggesting that prizes are either awarded to work most likely to be published or that being awarded a prize encourages publication. Given that just over 40% of prize-winning abstracts remain unpublished, the ESPR should do more to support and encourage all authors to publish their work.

在欧洲儿科放射学会年度科学会议上获奖摘要的出版命运。
背景:欧洲儿科放射学会(ESPR)在其年度科学会议上颁发杰出工作奖。获得ESPR奖的摘要在期刊上发表的比例尚不清楚。通过评估发表经验,将摘要与发表的比例联系起来,可以产生有价值的见解和可操作的结果,以支持研究人员克服期刊发表的障碍。目的:评价ESPR获奖摘要的摘要发表比例及获奖作者在ESPR附属期刊《儿科放射学》及其他国际儿科放射学专业学会的发表经历。材料和方法:在PubMed检索1977年(首次获奖年份)至2021年(含2021年)ESPR奖获奖摘要的标题,其中主讲人要么是第一作者,要么是共同作者,并且该文章发表于颁奖年份的前后2年。如果没有找到,则执行一般的互联网搜索。评估所有检索文章的标题是否纳入。一份调查被分发给所有ESPR奖的获奖者,以更好地了解他们在期刊投稿方面的经历。结果:44年来共获奖108次。获奖摘要发表率(59.3%,OR=2.10, P=0.012)显著高于近期发表的儿科放射学“摘要发表率”(2013-2016年为41.9%)。此外,获奖者发表期刊(OR=2.10)和成为第一作者(OR=1.33)的可能性是前者的两倍多。大多数获奖者以第一作者发表(52/64,81.3%),第一作者摘要发表率不显著高于儿科放射学“摘要发表率”(48.1%,OR=0.33, P=0.330)。共收到64份调查回复(占108份获奖总数的59.3%)。超过20%的获奖作品发表在《儿科放射学》上,41.5%的受访者报告了良好到优秀的投稿体验。结论:espr获奖摘要的获奖和第一作者摘要发表比例高于最近报道的儿科放射学“摘要发表率”,这表明奖项要么授予最有可能发表的工作,要么授予奖励鼓励发表。考虑到超过40%的获奖摘要尚未发表,ESPR应该做更多的工作来支持和鼓励所有作者发表他们的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Radiology
Pediatric Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
300
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Official Journal of the European Society of Pediatric Radiology, the Society for Pediatric Radiology and the Asian and Oceanic Society for Pediatric Radiology Pediatric Radiology informs its readers of new findings and progress in all areas of pediatric imaging and in related fields. This is achieved by a blend of original papers, complemented by reviews that set out the present state of knowledge in a particular area of the specialty or summarize specific topics in which discussion has led to clear conclusions. Advances in technology, methodology, apparatus and auxiliary equipment are presented, and modifications of standard techniques are described. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信