Evaluation of the Content Validity of the COVID-19 Symptoms Daily Diary.

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Patient Related Outcome Measures Pub Date : 2025-01-17 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/PROM.S488914
Jennifer Dine, Yanfen Guan, Mirline Milien, Claire Ervin, Dana D Byrne, Michelle L Brown, Carisa De Anda, Josephine M Norquist
{"title":"Evaluation of the Content Validity of the COVID-19 Symptoms Daily Diary.","authors":"Jennifer Dine, Yanfen Guan, Mirline Milien, Claire Ervin, Dana D Byrne, Michelle L Brown, Carisa De Anda, Josephine M Norquist","doi":"10.2147/PROM.S488914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 Symptoms Daily Diary (CSDD) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the severity of core COVID-19 symptoms in clinical trials. The preliminary version of the CSDD was developed based on regulatory guidance and the hallmark COVID-19 symptoms identified by the CDC. This study aimed to evaluate CSDD content validity, to determine whether it is fit for the purpose of supporting efficacy endpoints in clinical trials of treatments for COVID-19. This research also sought to evaluate the appropriateness of a newly developed Pre-COVID-19 Symptoms Questionnaire.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A targeted literature review was completed to evaluate the relevance of concepts included in the diary and to identify any important symptoms that may have been missing. Hybrid (concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing) semistructured qualitative interviews were then conducted across 3 iterative rounds with 30 adults in the United States recently diagnosed with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CSDD included concepts that were most frequently reported by interview participants, including those identified as most bothersome and most important to treat. During cognitive debriefing, participants described the diary concepts as salient and reported the instructions, recall period, and response options as clear and appropriate. Only 2 of 15 CSDD items were modified across 3 interview rounds; specifically, definitions for the vomiting and diarrhea frequency items were clarified for consistent interpretation and response. Interview participants also reported general ease in understanding and responding to the Pre-COVID-19 questionnaire, with feedback resulting in only minor changes to the reference period and instructions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of the current study provide strong evidence for the content validity of the CSDD and the appropriateness of each of the items assessed. This rigorous evaluation (aligned with regulatory guidance) indicates that the CSDD is fit for the purpose of supporting efficacy endpoints in planned clinical trials evaluating medications for COVID-19 treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19747,"journal":{"name":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","volume":"16 ","pages":"37-53"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11748756/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Patient Related Outcome Measures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S488914","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The COVID-19 Symptoms Daily Diary (CSDD) is a patient-reported outcome measure designed to assess the severity of core COVID-19 symptoms in clinical trials. The preliminary version of the CSDD was developed based on regulatory guidance and the hallmark COVID-19 symptoms identified by the CDC. This study aimed to evaluate CSDD content validity, to determine whether it is fit for the purpose of supporting efficacy endpoints in clinical trials of treatments for COVID-19. This research also sought to evaluate the appropriateness of a newly developed Pre-COVID-19 Symptoms Questionnaire.

Methods: A targeted literature review was completed to evaluate the relevance of concepts included in the diary and to identify any important symptoms that may have been missing. Hybrid (concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing) semistructured qualitative interviews were then conducted across 3 iterative rounds with 30 adults in the United States recently diagnosed with COVID-19.

Results: The CSDD included concepts that were most frequently reported by interview participants, including those identified as most bothersome and most important to treat. During cognitive debriefing, participants described the diary concepts as salient and reported the instructions, recall period, and response options as clear and appropriate. Only 2 of 15 CSDD items were modified across 3 interview rounds; specifically, definitions for the vomiting and diarrhea frequency items were clarified for consistent interpretation and response. Interview participants also reported general ease in understanding and responding to the Pre-COVID-19 questionnaire, with feedback resulting in only minor changes to the reference period and instructions.

Conclusion: The findings of the current study provide strong evidence for the content validity of the CSDD and the appropriateness of each of the items assessed. This rigorous evaluation (aligned with regulatory guidance) indicates that the CSDD is fit for the purpose of supporting efficacy endpoints in planned clinical trials evaluating medications for COVID-19 treatment.

《新冠肺炎症状日记》内容效度评价
简介:COVID-19症状日记(CSDD)是一项患者报告的结局指标,旨在评估临床试验中COVID-19核心症状的严重程度。CSDD的初步版本是根据监管指导和疾病预防控制中心确定的COVID-19标志性症状制定的。本研究旨在评估CSDD内容效度,以确定其是否适合用于支持COVID-19治疗临床试验的疗效终点。本研究还试图评估新开发的covid -19前症状问卷的适用性。方法:完成有针对性的文献综述,以评估日记中包含的概念的相关性,并确定可能遗漏的任何重要症状。然后对最近被诊断为COVID-19的30名美国成年人进行了混合(概念引出和认知汇报)半结构化定性访谈,共进行了3轮迭代。结果:CSDD包括了访谈参与者最常报告的概念,包括那些被确定为最麻烦和最重要的治疗。在认知汇报中,参与者将日记的概念描述为突出的,并将指示、回忆期和反应选项报告为清晰和适当的。在3轮访谈中,15个CSDD项目中只有2个被修改;具体来说,对呕吐和腹泻频率项目的定义进行了澄清,以使解释和反应一致。受访者还报告说,总体而言,理解和回答covid -19前问卷比较容易,反馈只导致参考期和说明发生微小变化。结论:本研究的结果为CSDD的内容效度和每个评估项目的适当性提供了强有力的证据。这一严格的评估(符合监管指南)表明,CSDD适合用于支持计划临床试验中评估COVID-19治疗药物的疗效终点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Patient Related Outcome Measures
Patient Related Outcome Measures HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
4.80%
发文量
27
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信